RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고려전기와 조선초기 국상 시 황제국 측의 조문 외교 의례의 비교 탐색 = The Comparison of Diplomatic Rites for condolences by the Chinese Imperial State after the death of the King between the early Koryŏ and early Chosŏn period

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108552084

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper, in terms of diplomatic rituals performed by the Chinese Imperial State at the level of condolences after the death of the king, it was clarified that there was a large epochal gap between the early Koryŏ and early Chosŏn period. And the historical implications of this epochal difference were explored.
      Specifically, by means of the ceremonial procedure prepared by Koryŏ in the early Koryŏ Dynasty, the Chinese Imperial state performed the diplomatic rites for condolences. In the early Chosŏn Dynasty, the Ming emperor dispatched envoys to Chosŏn to condolence upon the death of the king, and the envoys executed Saje (賜祭), Sabu (賜賻) and Sasi (賜諡) ritual, which were conducted based on the ceremonial procedures unprecedentedly prepared by the Ming side and sent to Chosŏn. And I tried that this fact was highlighted and its meaning was clarified. In particular, it was noted that the action of the Ming side was confined to Chosŏn, and in fact, they were passively acted upon by the Chosŏn side’s Choengsi (請諡) and Kobu (告訃) ritual.
      Next, while Kibok (起復) ritual was held in the early Koryŏ period, it was not like that in early Chosŏn period. the difference between the two periods was highlighted and the meaning was explored. In particular, attention was paid to how the difference in the external status of the 'enthronement' held in Korea during each period was related to whether or not the Kibok (起復) ritual was performed. Another disparate point is the fact that Sasi (賜諡) ritual was held in Chosŏn but not in the early Koryŏ period, and this difference and its context were investigated.
      Lastly, various heterogeneous aspects between Jejŏn (祭奠) ritual in the early Koryŏ period and Saje (賜祭) ritual in Chosŏn were reviewed. In particular, Jejŏn (祭奠) ritual in the early Koryŏ period was ceremonies that reflected the differential relationship between superiors and subordinates and at the same time commemorated deceased foreign monarchs by the Chinese emperor on the premise of a relationship between monarch and monarch. In contrast, it was found out that Saje (賜祭) ritual in the early Chosŏn period was a ceremony in which the Ming emperor sent an envoy to give praise and instructions to the Chosŏn king. In addition, the historical implications of the difference in aspects were also explored.
      번역하기

      In this paper, in terms of diplomatic rituals performed by the Chinese Imperial State at the level of condolences after the death of the king, it was clarified that there was a large epochal gap between the early Koryŏ and early Chosŏn period. And t...

      In this paper, in terms of diplomatic rituals performed by the Chinese Imperial State at the level of condolences after the death of the king, it was clarified that there was a large epochal gap between the early Koryŏ and early Chosŏn period. And the historical implications of this epochal difference were explored.
      Specifically, by means of the ceremonial procedure prepared by Koryŏ in the early Koryŏ Dynasty, the Chinese Imperial state performed the diplomatic rites for condolences. In the early Chosŏn Dynasty, the Ming emperor dispatched envoys to Chosŏn to condolence upon the death of the king, and the envoys executed Saje (賜祭), Sabu (賜賻) and Sasi (賜諡) ritual, which were conducted based on the ceremonial procedures unprecedentedly prepared by the Ming side and sent to Chosŏn. And I tried that this fact was highlighted and its meaning was clarified. In particular, it was noted that the action of the Ming side was confined to Chosŏn, and in fact, they were passively acted upon by the Chosŏn side’s Choengsi (請諡) and Kobu (告訃) ritual.
      Next, while Kibok (起復) ritual was held in the early Koryŏ period, it was not like that in early Chosŏn period. the difference between the two periods was highlighted and the meaning was explored. In particular, attention was paid to how the difference in the external status of the 'enthronement' held in Korea during each period was related to whether or not the Kibok (起復) ritual was performed. Another disparate point is the fact that Sasi (賜諡) ritual was held in Chosŏn but not in the early Koryŏ period, and this difference and its context were investigated.
      Lastly, various heterogeneous aspects between Jejŏn (祭奠) ritual in the early Koryŏ period and Saje (賜祭) ritual in Chosŏn were reviewed. In particular, Jejŏn (祭奠) ritual in the early Koryŏ period was ceremonies that reflected the differential relationship between superiors and subordinates and at the same time commemorated deceased foreign monarchs by the Chinese emperor on the premise of a relationship between monarch and monarch. In contrast, it was found out that Saje (賜祭) ritual in the early Chosŏn period was a ceremony in which the Ming emperor sent an envoy to give praise and instructions to the Chosŏn king. In addition, the historical implications of the difference in aspects were also explored.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼