RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      유도 지도자의 코칭 행동유형이 집단응집력 및 선수만족에 미치는 영향 = An effect which Judo instructors' types of coaching behavior have on the cohesion of a group and the satisfaction of judo players

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45037222

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The goal of this study is to examine characteristics of coaching behaviors of judo coaches, to compare and analyze the types of coaching behaviors, to figure out the cohesion of a group and the degree of satisfaction which judo players feel with their...

      The goal of this study is to examine characteristics of coaching behaviors of judo coaches, to compare and analyze the types of coaching behaviors, to figure out the cohesion of a group and the degree of satisfaction which judo players feel with their coaches and to use it as the basic materials to improve the leadership of judo coaches.
      To achieve the goals, 710 players as the study population were selected from judo players registered for Korea Judo Association from February, 2002. Among them each 20 player was selected from 30 high school teams, 15 college teams and 12 industrial teams. They were sampled with systematic stratified duster random sampling method.
      Questionnaires were distributed to them. The effective questionnaires were used to be analyzed as data. They were analyzed with SPSS PC+ Ver 10.0, Frequency Analysis, t-test, One way ANOVA, Correlation and Duncan 's post-hoc test. Regression analysis also was used and the level of significance of all hypothesis tests was a=.05. The following results were obtained.
      Firstly, there was not a significant difference in their team, exercise career and exercise hour, authoritative behaviors among sub-variables of types of instructors (P〈.05) while there was a significant difference in their age, personal records and training, self-governing, authority, social support and redemptive behavior, which were sub-variables of types of instructors according to group records.(P〈.01)
      Secondly, there was not a significant difference in a cohesion of group according to exercise career(P〈.05) while there was statistically a significant difference in their team, personal records, group records, group cohesion according to exercise hour and the group cohesion and satisfaction of players, which were sub-variables of players' satisfaction. (P〈.01)
      Thirdly, the correlation between group cohesion according to type of coaching and player's satisfaction was analyzed. According to the result of the analysis, 5 factors, which were behaviors of training, self-governing, authority, social support and redemption, showed very high static correlation at the level of 5%. There was not a significant difference in social support which had an effect on group cohesion according to the type of coaching behaviors. 4 factors, which were behavior of training, self-governing, authority and redemption, had a static effect at the level of 5%.
      Fourthly, player's satisfaction showed non-static correlation with authoritative behaviors while it showed high static correlation with four factors, which were behavior of training, self-governing, social support and redemption at the level of 5%. There was not a significant difference in the social support which had an effect on satisfaction of players according to their types of behaviors and redemptive behavior while the behavior of training, self-governing, authority and redemption had a static effect at the level of 5%.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
      • 2. 연구의 문제
      • 3. 연구의 가설
      • 4. 연구의 정의
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
      • 2. 연구의 문제
      • 3. 연구의 가설
      • 4. 연구의 정의
      • 5. 연구의 변인과 모형
      • 6. 연구의 제한점
      • Ⅱ. 연구의 방법
      • 1. 연구대상
      • 2. 측정도구
      • 3. 통계처리방법
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 결과
      • Ⅳ. 연구의 논의
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
      • 참고문헌
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼