The goal of this study is to examine characteristics of coaching behaviors of judo coaches, to compare and analyze the types of coaching behaviors, to figure out the cohesion of a group and the degree of satisfaction which judo players feel with their...
The goal of this study is to examine characteristics of coaching behaviors of judo coaches, to compare and analyze the types of coaching behaviors, to figure out the cohesion of a group and the degree of satisfaction which judo players feel with their coaches and to use it as the basic materials to improve the leadership of judo coaches.
To achieve the goals, 710 players as the study population were selected from judo players registered for Korea Judo Association from February, 2002. Among them each 20 player was selected from 30 high school teams, 15 college teams and 12 industrial teams. They were sampled with systematic stratified duster random sampling method.
Questionnaires were distributed to them. The effective questionnaires were used to be analyzed as data. They were analyzed with SPSS PC+ Ver 10.0, Frequency Analysis, t-test, One way ANOVA, Correlation and Duncan 's post-hoc test. Regression analysis also was used and the level of significance of all hypothesis tests was a=.05. The following results were obtained.
Firstly, there was not a significant difference in their team, exercise career and exercise hour, authoritative behaviors among sub-variables of types of instructors (P〈.05) while there was a significant difference in their age, personal records and training, self-governing, authority, social support and redemptive behavior, which were sub-variables of types of instructors according to group records.(P〈.01)
Secondly, there was not a significant difference in a cohesion of group according to exercise career(P〈.05) while there was statistically a significant difference in their team, personal records, group records, group cohesion according to exercise hour and the group cohesion and satisfaction of players, which were sub-variables of players' satisfaction. (P〈.01)
Thirdly, the correlation between group cohesion according to type of coaching and player's satisfaction was analyzed. According to the result of the analysis, 5 factors, which were behaviors of training, self-governing, authority, social support and redemption, showed very high static correlation at the level of 5%. There was not a significant difference in social support which had an effect on group cohesion according to the type of coaching behaviors. 4 factors, which were behavior of training, self-governing, authority and redemption, had a static effect at the level of 5%.
Fourthly, player's satisfaction showed non-static correlation with authoritative behaviors while it showed high static correlation with four factors, which were behavior of training, self-governing, social support and redemption at the level of 5%. There was not a significant difference in the social support which had an effect on satisfaction of players according to their types of behaviors and redemptive behavior while the behavior of training, self-governing, authority and redemption had a static effect at the level of 5%.