모형 구성 과정에서 나타나는 초등학생의 인지, 감정적 반박 -인식적 감정을 중심으로- = Elementary Students` Cognitive-Emotional Rebuttals in Their Modeling Activity: Focusing on Epistemic Affect

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 초등학생들이 모형 구성 과정에서 어떻게 인지, 감정적 반박을 사용했는지, 특히 그들의 감정과 인지적 과정이 어떻게 상호작용하여 반박이 나타나게 되었는지 탐색한 것이다. 초등학교 5학년, 25명이 과학 수업의 일환으로 연구에 참여하였다. 6차시 동안 학생들은 지속적인 논의를 통해 인간 호흡 운동 시스템 모형을 구성하였다. 연구 결과에 따르면 초등학생들은 모형 구성 과정에서 정교화형 반박, 방어형 반박, 비난형 반박을 사용하였다. 인지적 비형형 상태와 연관 된 부정적 인식적 감정과 인지적 과정의 상호작용을 통해 나타난 정교화형 반박은 소집단 모형을 정교화하는데 도움을 주었다. 반면 관계 악화와 관련된 부정적 인식적 감정과 인지적 과정의 상호작용을 통해 나타난 방어형 반박과 비난형 반박은 모형의 정교화를 이끌기 보다는 다른 학생들의 제안, 설명을 배제하거나 공격하기 위해 사용되었고, 이 때의 부정적 인식적 감정은 다른 학생들의 바람직하지 않은 행동에 의해 생성되었다. 연구 결과는 학생들의 반박이 인식적 감정과 관련된 인식론적 역동에 의해 나타나게 됨을 보여준다. 본 연구는 학생들의 초보적, 수정될 필요가 있는 설명으로부터 부정적 인식적 감정이 생성되는 것은 모형 구성 과정에서 모형 발달을 돕는 정교화형 반박이 나타나게 되는 측면에서는 자연스러운 것이며, 정교화형 반박을 수용하도록 돕는 학생들의 감정 조절은 모형을 발달시키는데 도움이 될 수 있음을 논의한다. 또한 관계의 악화로 인해 나타날 수 있는 부정적 인식적 감정은 초등학생이 조절하기 어려우며, 이것이 협력적 모형 구성을 어렵게 할 수 있음을 제언한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigates how elementary students used cognitive-emotional rebuttals in the context of modeling activities, especially on how their emotional and cognitive processes lead them to use rebuttals in terms of epistemic affect. Twenty-five fifth grade elementary students participated in the study as part of their science class. During the course of their sixth periods, students constructed a human respiratory system model through continuous discussion. The research results showed that elementary students used an elaboration-oriented rebuttal, a defence-oriented rebuttal, and a blame-oriented rebuttal in their modeling activity. The elaboration-oriented rebuttal interspersed with negative epistemic affect was used to elaborate on a student`s explanation, and a negative epistemic affect was elicited from their cognitive discrepancy. On the other hand, defence-oriented rebuttal and blame-oriented rebuttal entangled with negative epistemic affect were used to defeat the students rather than help rigor evaluation of students` explanation, and the negative epistemic affect was elicited from the other students` undesirable behavior. These results suggest that students` rebuttals can be elicited by epistemic dynamics related to the epistemic affect. The study shows that if negative epistemic affect were elicited from the other students` naive or false explanations, such an emotion is natural in terms of model construction, and the model can be further developed through the acceptance of the elaboration-oriented rebuttals by students` emotion regulation. In addition, we suggest that negative emotions aroused from the worsening of relationships during small group modeling activities are difficult to regulate and can have negative effects on students` cooperative model construction.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한문현, "초등학생의 먹이 그물 모형 구성에서 교사 질문 단서의 역할" 한국생물교육학회 41 (41): 296-309, 2013

2 유연준, "초등학생들의 계절의 변화 단원의 학습에서 모델링 중심 과학 탐구 수업의 효과" 한국초등과학교육학회 35 (35): 265-276, 2016

3 이재신, "이성과 감정: 인간의 판단과정에 대한 뇌과학과 생물학적 접근" 한국언론학회 10 (10): 161-194, 2014

4 강은희, "심장 혈액 흐름의 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 소집단 상호작용과 소집단 규범" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 372-387, 2012

5 권지숙, "실험 설계에서 나타난 소집단 논변활동 탐색: 활동에 대한 인식적 목표와 인식적 이해를 중심으로" 한국과학교육학회 36 (36): 45-61, 2016

6 이신영, "소집단 상호작용에 따른 심장 내 혈액 흐름에 대한 소집단 모델 발달 유형과 추론 과정 탐색" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 805-822, 2012

7 김희경, "교육실습과정에서 나타난 예비과학교사의 감정 경험과 감정 표현 규칙, 조절 전략의 탐색" 한국과학교육학회 36 (36): 231-251, 2016

8 이차은, "과학적 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 사고 질문의 개념적 자원 활성화의 이해 -인식론적 프레이밍과 위치 짓기 프레이밍을 중심으로-" 한국과학교육학회 36 (36): 471-483, 2016

9 Immordino‐Yang, M. H., "We feel, therefore we learn:The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education" 1 (1): 3-10, 2007

10 Collins, R., "Violence: A micro-sociological theory" Princeton University Press 2008

11 Hmelo-Silver, C. E., "Using representational tools to learn about complex systems : A tale of two classrooms" 52 (52): 6-35, 2015

12 Thamm, R., "Towards a universal power and status theory of emotion" 21 : 189-222, 2004

13 Kawasaki, K., "Theory building and modeling in a sinking and floating unit : A case study of third and fourth grade students’ developing epistemologies of science" 26 (26): 1299-1324, 2004

14 Toulmin, S. E., "The uses of argument" Cambridge University Press 2003

15 Gordon, S. L., "The sociology of sentiments and emotion" Basic Books 562-592, 1981

16 Turner, J. H., "The sociology of emotions : Basic theoretical arguments" 1 (1): 340-354, 2009

17 Kuhn, D., "The skill of argument" The camebridge university press 1991

18 Feynman, R. P., "The pleasure of finding things out" Perseus 1999

19 Gross, J. J., "The emerging field of emotion regulation : An integrative review" 2 (2): 271-299, 1998

20 Lin, Y. -R., "The analysis and reconciliation of students’rebuttals in argumentation activities" 38 (38): 130-155, 2016

21 Stryker, S., "Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version" Benjamin Cummings 1980

22 Tomas, L., "Students’ regulation of their emotions in a science classroom" 53 (53): 234-260, 2016

23 Alsop, S., "Science education and affect" 25 (25): 1043-1047, 2003

24 Johnson, S. K., "Revising and assessing explanatory models in a high school genetics class: A comparison of unsuccessful and successful performance" 86 (86): 463-480, 2002

25 Jaber, L. Z., "Responsive Teaching in Science and Mathematics" 162-, 2015

26 Tobin, K., "Relationships between emotional climate and the fluency of classroom interactions" 16 (16): 71-89, 2013

27 Liu, L., "Promoting complex systems learning through the use of conceptual representations in hypermedia" 46 (46): 1023-1040, 2009

28 Kershner, R., "Primary children’’s management of themselves and others in collaborative group work: ‘’Sometimes it takes patience...”" 42 (42): 201-216, 2012

29 Hatano, G., "Perspectives on socially shared cognition" American Psychological Association 331-348, 1991

30 Liu, L., "New Science of Learning" Springer 341-356, 2010

31 Sidnell, J., "Multimodal interaction" 156 (156): 1-20, 2005

32 Pekrun, R., "Motivational psychology of human development: Developing motivation and motivating development" Elsevier Science 143-163, 2000

33 Justi, R. S., "Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers" 24 (24): 369-387, 2002

34 Mead, G. H., "Mind, self and society" University of Chicago Press 1934

35 Berland, L. K., "Making sense of argumentation and explanation" 93 (93): 26-55, 2009

36 Mercer, N., "Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction" Routledge 79-99, 1999

37 Jaber, L. Z., "Learning to feel like a scientist" 100 (100): 189-220, 2016

38 Sinatra, G. M., "International handbook of emotions in education" Routledge 415-436, 2014

39 Collins, R., "Interaction ritual chains" Princeton University Press 2004

40 Vygotsky, L., "Interaction between learning and development" 23 (23): 34-41, 1978

41 Jordan, B., "Interaction analysis : Foundations and practice" 4 (4): 39-103, 1995

42 Stryker, S., "Integrating emotion into identity theory" 21 : 1-23, 2004

43 Louca, L. T., "In Quest of productive modeling‐based learning discourse in elementary school science" 48 (48): 919-951, 2011

44 Cooley, C. H., "Human nature and the social order" Shocken 1902

45 Shen, J., "From conceptual change to transformative modeling : A case study of an elementary teacher in learning astronomy" 91 (91): 948-966, 2007

46 Vo, T., "Fostering Third-Grade Students’ Use of Scientific Models with the Water Cycle : Elementary teachers’conceptions and practices" 37 (37): 2411-2432, 2015

47 Passmore, C. M., "Exploring opportunities for argumentation in modelling classrooms" 34 (34): 1535-1554, 2012

48 Forbes, C. T., "Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena : 3rdgrade students’ model‐driven explanation‐construction" 52 (52): 895-921, 2015

49 King, D., "Emotionally intense science activities" 37 (37): 1886-1914, 2015

50 Matthews, G., "Emotional intelligence:Science and myth" MIT Press 2002

51 Bellocchi, A., "Emotional climate and high quality learning experiences in science teacher education" 51 (51): 1301-1325, 2014

52 Boekaerts, M., "Emotion in education" Academic Press 37-56, 2007

53 Shott, S., "Emotion and social life : A symbolic interactionist analysis" 84 (84): 1317-1334, 1979

54 Schwarz, C. V., "Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling : Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners" 46 (46): 632-654, 2009

55 Pollock, J. L., "Defeasible reasoning" 11 (11): 481-518, 1987

56 Clement, J., "Creative model construction in scientists and students:The role of imagery, analogy, and mental simulation" Springer Science & Business Media 2008

57 Lorimer, J., "Counting corncrakes the affective science of the UK Corncrake Census" 38 (38): 377-405, 2008

58 Windschitl, M., "Beyond the scientific method : Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations" 92 (92): 941-967, 2008

59 Alsop, S., "Beyond Cartesian Dualism: Encountering Affect in the Teaching and Learning of Science" Springer Science &Business Media 2005

60 Corbin, J., "Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" Sage publications 2014

61 Plantin, C., "Amsterdam Studies in the theory and history of linguistic science series 4" 247-276, 2004

62 DeBellis, V. A., "Affect and meta-affect in mathematical problem solving: A representational perspective" 63 (63): 131-147, 2006