RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Off Into the Sunset: Designing for the Inevitable End of Projects [electronic resource]

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16931715

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2023

      • 학위수여대학

        University of Washington Information School

      • 수여연도

        2023

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • 학위

        Ph.D.

      • 페이지수

        1 online resource(115 p.)

      • 지도교수/심사위원

        Advisor: Davis, Katie;Yip, Jason C.

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Ending projects - in whatever form that takes - is a known area of difficulty for research that involves designing and implementing technologies with community partners. The ending process is particularly salient to underserved and marginalized communities and populations. This dissertation explores the project ecosystem and power dynamics in which researchers and participants exist when collaborating on technology design projects involving youth and their communities. From this exploration, I look to identify types of and strategies for ending, to build a framework for advancing design justice in the ending process.The first set of empirical studies in this dissertation address the power dynamics and roles within community-based technology design projects and multigenerational co-design teams. From this work we learn how we can encourage youth and their communities to take ownership of learning technologies through participatory design and involvement in the technology implementation process. Subsequent studies focus on the long-term impacts of such projects and how the community and researchers can begin to transition these technologies to community ownership, while understanding the resource constraints of both the researchers and communities, particularly the youth members. The final study - a cross case analysis of two long-term projects - extends this work on power dynamics and impacts, using the understanding of systems and infrastructure to frame our understanding of the equitable ending process and what different endings might look like. Together, these studies provide grounding for a framework to create a more just and equitable ending process, specifically creating guidelines for designing the end of the research cycle in an ethical and practical manner.This dissertation provides a number of empirical insights on the development and changes within relationships and power dynamics throughout the course of community-based educational technology design projects involving youth; the challenges, obstacles, and opportunities at the conclusion of the life cycle of the aforementioned projects; and the different ways ending a project occurs. The work also has theoretical implications, drawing on value sensitive design, research-practice partnerships, and other theories around community relationships to form an understanding of project ending as a space for design. Finally, this work contributes a theoretically-grounded methodological framework for designing projects involving long-term technology development with youth and their communities that plan for and incorporate the ending of the project, derived from the findings in the previous contributions. Through this work I explore the dimensions and considerations in ending a project that involves a long-term partnership with a community, developing ways to discuss, navigate, and plan for the closing process and facilitating less extractive and more mutually beneficial community research partnerships.
      번역하기

      Ending projects - in whatever form that takes - is a known area of difficulty for research that involves designing and implementing technologies with community partners. The ending process is particularly salient to underserved and marginalized commu...

      Ending projects - in whatever form that takes - is a known area of difficulty for research that involves designing and implementing technologies with community partners. The ending process is particularly salient to underserved and marginalized communities and populations. This dissertation explores the project ecosystem and power dynamics in which researchers and participants exist when collaborating on technology design projects involving youth and their communities. From this exploration, I look to identify types of and strategies for ending, to build a framework for advancing design justice in the ending process.The first set of empirical studies in this dissertation address the power dynamics and roles within community-based technology design projects and multigenerational co-design teams. From this work we learn how we can encourage youth and their communities to take ownership of learning technologies through participatory design and involvement in the technology implementation process. Subsequent studies focus on the long-term impacts of such projects and how the community and researchers can begin to transition these technologies to community ownership, while understanding the resource constraints of both the researchers and communities, particularly the youth members. The final study - a cross case analysis of two long-term projects - extends this work on power dynamics and impacts, using the understanding of systems and infrastructure to frame our understanding of the equitable ending process and what different endings might look like. Together, these studies provide grounding for a framework to create a more just and equitable ending process, specifically creating guidelines for designing the end of the research cycle in an ethical and practical manner.This dissertation provides a number of empirical insights on the development and changes within relationships and power dynamics throughout the course of community-based educational technology design projects involving youth; the challenges, obstacles, and opportunities at the conclusion of the life cycle of the aforementioned projects; and the different ways ending a project occurs. The work also has theoretical implications, drawing on value sensitive design, research-practice partnerships, and other theories around community relationships to form an understanding of project ending as a space for design. Finally, this work contributes a theoretically-grounded methodological framework for designing projects involving long-term technology development with youth and their communities that plan for and incorporate the ending of the project, derived from the findings in the previous contributions. Through this work I explore the dimensions and considerations in ending a project that involves a long-term partnership with a community, developing ways to discuss, navigate, and plan for the closing process and facilitating less extractive and more mutually beneficial community research partnerships.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼