User-oriented service and policy innovation in shared research equipment infrastructure: an application of the QFD and Kano's model to the Gyeonggi Bio-Center

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The asymmetry of knowledge with regard to user requirements for a shared research equipmentservice makes it difficult to develop user-oriented strategies and policies. To resolve this issue,we developed a framework using the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) process and Kano’smodel for application to a case study on innovation in the shared research equipment service atthe Gyeonggi Bio-Center. Kano’s model allows us to define which service quality requirementsare attractive, one-dimensional or must-be qualities in the shared research equipment service.
The QFD process has rarely been applied to the shared research equipment service (which isclosely related with technology infrastructure policy). The newly developed frameworkconsists of three actors: ‘user’, ‘service institution’ and ‘provincial government’. The QFDprocess in the framework is performed by a two-step deployment of service deployment andpolicy deployment that bridges the knowledge gap among the three actors in the regionalinnovation system. Alternatives and implications for shared research equipment service witha focus on user-friendliness have been systematically produced through application of thesuggested framework.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 설성수, "한국의 연구장비 현황과 구축패턴" 한국기술혁신학회 9 (9): 471-495, 2006

2 홍재근, "지역 연구 공용장비 운영체계 개선을 위한 특성 분류 연구: 경기도 지역에 대한 탐색적 사례연구를 중심으로" 한국기술혁신학회 14 (14): 833-859, 2011

3 권기헌, "과학기술 경쟁력 제고를 위한 대형연구시설 및 장비평가모형 분석" 한국기술혁신학회 10 (10): 121-142, 2007

4 임성민, "공공 R&D 시설 ․ 장비의 공동 활용 전략에 대한 연구: 사업별 서비스 품질 개선 및 운영주체의 역할 재조정" 한국기술혁신학회 12 (12): 388-412, 2009

5 Uyarra, E., "What is evolutionary about regional systems of innovation? Implications for regional policy" 20 : 115-137, 2010

6 Oakland, J.S., "Total Quality Management" Butterworth Heinemann 1989

7 Lee, S., "Theory and Case of QFD" Eretec Inc 2008

8 Kruytbosch, C.E., "The role of instrumentation in advancing the frontiers of science, In Equipping Science for the 21st Century" Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd 29-42, 1997

9 Tassey, G., "The function of technology infrastructure in a competitive economy" 20 : 345-361, 1991

10 Zultner, R.E., "The Kano model: recent developments" 2006

11 Sauerwein, E., "The Kano model: how to delight your customers" 313-327, 1996

12 Lee, C., "The Efficient Installation and Usage Facilitation Method of the Large-sized Research Instrument Installation" Technovalue 2003

13 Seok, Y.C., "Technology Infrastructure: its importance and policy implication" 1 (1): 9-22, 1998

14 Justman, M., "Technological infrastructure policy (tip): creating capabilities and building markets" 24 : 259-281, 1995

15 Lee, J., "Survey of Research and Development in Korea 2010" MEST 2010

16 Fitzsimmons, J.A., "Service Management for Competitive Advantage" McGraw-Hill, International Edition 1994

17 Presidental Commission on Small and Medium Enterprise, "Satisfaction survey result on the use of test and research instrument of SME" 2004

18 Parasuraman, A., "SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality" 64 (64): 5-6, 1988

19 Parasuraman, A., "Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale" 67 (67): 420-450, 1991

20 Chan, L., "Quality function deployment: a literature review" 143 : 463-497, 2002

21 Jang, P., "QFD-based policy demand driven science & technology policy" 2006

22 Park, G., "Problems of Public Sector R&D Instrument and Plan for the Usage Maximization" Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade 2004

23 To¨dtling, F., "One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach" 34 : 1203-1209, 2005

24 Berger, C., "Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality" 2 (2): 3-36, 1993

25 Chaudha, A., "Integration of Kano’s model into quality function deployment (QFD)" 53 (53): 689-698, 2011

26 Tontini, G., "Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products" 20 (20): 345-361, 2007

27 Tan, K.C., "Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment" 11 (11): 1141-1151, 2000

28 Cho, H., "Institution and implications from the shared instrumentation service of Japanese research facility and instrument" STEPI 2010

29 Curry, A., "Innovation in public service management" 9 (9): 180-190, 1999

30 Riggs, W., "Incentives to innovate and the source of innovation: the case of scientific instruments" 23 : 459-469, 1994

31 Abelson, P.H., "Experimental technology" 283 (283): 1263-, 1999

32 Hwang, B., "Development strategy of science and technology infrastructure in national innovation system: focusing on shared research instrument policy" 2005

33 Koo, J., "Current status and improvement direction of R&D research instrument and Facility of National R&D Project" 2008

34 Park, G., "Case study of nanotechnology infrastructure institute management" STEPI 2009

35 Kano, N., "Attractive quality and must-be quality" 14 (14): 39-48, 1984

36 Park, Y., "An extension of quality function development" 25 (25): 27-49, 1997

37 Timko, M., "An experiment in continuous analysis" 2 (2): 17-20, 1993

38 Kim, S., "A study on strategy for improving health care service through quality function deployment" 27 (27): 1-19, 1999