RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      성 보수주의와 남성 성 자유주의를 넘어: 페미니스트는 포르노 문제에 어떻게 대응할 것인가 = Beyond Male Sexual Liberalism: How Should Feminists Deal with Pornography?

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Pornography has been a heated issue for American feminists, dividing them into two opposite camps, whereas Korean feminists kept silent during the pornography debate in the 1990s when the event of Jang Jungil, a Korean male novelist who wrote a sexually explicit novel and got imprisoned for that, took place. In the Korean sexual debate male sexual liberals and radicals fought against legal authority whose ideological position was based on moral conservatism; they advocated the right of writing and enjoying pornography, and criticized feminists for colluding with sexual conservatives. During that period Korean feminists belatedly exposed the sexual violence in Korean progressive movements in the 80s and early 90s, arguing for women`s rights of sexual self-determination. This article attempts to map out the topography of sexual ideology in Korea since late 1990s, and examine how to tackle the issue of pornography. First, it critically examines several definitions of pornography, both Korean and American, and then attempts to explain the tempting power of pornography on men, borrowing Drucilla Cornell`s psychoanalytic interpretation, Pornography reflects men`s sexual fantasy where lie their desire for and dread of the phallic mother; once the fantasized mother/infant dyad is broken, the phallic mother remains, in its unconscious, powerful and threatening; she at once gives and takes back life. In order to compensate for her power, the infant attempts to penetrate and destroy her through the father`s imaginary penis. It is the biological penis, the simplistic conflation of the penis with the phallus, that is portrayed in pornography, This ever-erect prick is just a fantasy, yet it exerts a powerful influence on men, Pornography as a representation of this masculine fantasy, I argue, harms women`s imaginary domain, a term coined by Cornell for indicating psychic and moral space in which one imagines who one is and who one seeks to become. I argue for feminist`s response to pornography shifting from legal regulation to political intervention. Legal regulation on pornography limits not only men`s but also women`s freedom of sexual expression, pivotal for women`s exploration of their selves. However, pornograph`s curtailment of women`s equal right for imaginary domain should be countered in political and cultural dimension. In conclusion, I argue for the responsibility for our desire as well as the demand for its right in order to live together.
      번역하기

      Pornography has been a heated issue for American feminists, dividing them into two opposite camps, whereas Korean feminists kept silent during the pornography debate in the 1990s when the event of Jang Jungil, a Korean male novelist who wrote a sexual...

      Pornography has been a heated issue for American feminists, dividing them into two opposite camps, whereas Korean feminists kept silent during the pornography debate in the 1990s when the event of Jang Jungil, a Korean male novelist who wrote a sexually explicit novel and got imprisoned for that, took place. In the Korean sexual debate male sexual liberals and radicals fought against legal authority whose ideological position was based on moral conservatism; they advocated the right of writing and enjoying pornography, and criticized feminists for colluding with sexual conservatives. During that period Korean feminists belatedly exposed the sexual violence in Korean progressive movements in the 80s and early 90s, arguing for women`s rights of sexual self-determination. This article attempts to map out the topography of sexual ideology in Korea since late 1990s, and examine how to tackle the issue of pornography. First, it critically examines several definitions of pornography, both Korean and American, and then attempts to explain the tempting power of pornography on men, borrowing Drucilla Cornell`s psychoanalytic interpretation, Pornography reflects men`s sexual fantasy where lie their desire for and dread of the phallic mother; once the fantasized mother/infant dyad is broken, the phallic mother remains, in its unconscious, powerful and threatening; she at once gives and takes back life. In order to compensate for her power, the infant attempts to penetrate and destroy her through the father`s imaginary penis. It is the biological penis, the simplistic conflation of the penis with the phallus, that is portrayed in pornography, This ever-erect prick is just a fantasy, yet it exerts a powerful influence on men, Pornography as a representation of this masculine fantasy, I argue, harms women`s imaginary domain, a term coined by Cornell for indicating psychic and moral space in which one imagines who one is and who one seeks to become. I argue for feminist`s response to pornography shifting from legal regulation to political intervention. Legal regulation on pornography limits not only men`s but also women`s freedom of sexual expression, pivotal for women`s exploration of their selves. However, pornograph`s curtailment of women`s equal right for imaginary domain should be countered in political and cultural dimension. In conclusion, I argue for the responsibility for our desire as well as the demand for its right in order to live together.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이재현, "포르노티즘과 에로그라피2-1" (11) : 113-122, 1997

      2 김수기, "포르노에 대한 다른 시각, In 섹스 포르노 에로티즘: 쾌락의 악몽을 넘어서" 현실문화연구 115-140, 1994

      3 서윤호, "포르노를 허하라? 포르노 규제 법리에 대한 고찰" 85-102, 2012

      4 박종성, "포르노는 없다: 권력에 대한 복합적 반감의 표현" 인간사랑 2003

      5 주유신, "포르노그래피와 여성의 성적 주체성-페미니스트 포르노 논쟁과 두 편의 텍스트를 중심으로-" 한국영화학회 (26) : 397-424, 2005

      6 이나영, "포르노그래피, 억압과 해방의 이분법을 넘어, In 섹슈얼리티 강의, 두 번째" 동녘 277-311, 2006

      7 오기 오가스, "포르노 보는 남자 로맨스 읽는 여자" 웅진지식하우스 2011

      8 운동사회성폭력뿌리뽑기100인위원회, "쥐는 언제나 고양이를 물어서는 안된다?" (49) : 150-176, 2001

      9 최성희, "자아로부터의 비상, 에로스, In 페미니즘: 차이와 사이" 문학동네 83-109, 2011

      10 최수태, "욕망해도 괜찮아? ‘강부자’, ‘고소영’, ‘김재철’도?!"

      1 이재현, "포르노티즘과 에로그라피2-1" (11) : 113-122, 1997

      2 김수기, "포르노에 대한 다른 시각, In 섹스 포르노 에로티즘: 쾌락의 악몽을 넘어서" 현실문화연구 115-140, 1994

      3 서윤호, "포르노를 허하라? 포르노 규제 법리에 대한 고찰" 85-102, 2012

      4 박종성, "포르노는 없다: 권력에 대한 복합적 반감의 표현" 인간사랑 2003

      5 주유신, "포르노그래피와 여성의 성적 주체성-페미니스트 포르노 논쟁과 두 편의 텍스트를 중심으로-" 한국영화학회 (26) : 397-424, 2005

      6 이나영, "포르노그래피, 억압과 해방의 이분법을 넘어, In 섹슈얼리티 강의, 두 번째" 동녘 277-311, 2006

      7 오기 오가스, "포르노 보는 남자 로맨스 읽는 여자" 웅진지식하우스 2011

      8 운동사회성폭력뿌리뽑기100인위원회, "쥐는 언제나 고양이를 물어서는 안된다?" (49) : 150-176, 2001

      9 최성희, "자아로부터의 비상, 에로스, In 페미니즘: 차이와 사이" 문학동네 83-109, 2011

      10 최수태, "욕망해도 괜찮아? ‘강부자’, ‘고소영’, ‘김재철’도?!"

      11 김두식, "욕망해도 괜찮아" 창비 2012

      12 김종갑, "실재를 향한 열정으로서 포르노" 57-73, 2012

      13 황정미, "성폭력의 정치에서 젠더정치로" (49) : 177-199, 2001

      14 신상숙, "성폭력의 의미구성과 ‘성적 자기결정권’의 딜렘마" (13) : 6-43, 2001

      15 린 헌트, "서문: 외설성과 현대성의 기원, 1500-1800, In 포르노그라피의 발명" 책세상 9-54, 1996

      16 유영소, "삐딱하게 보기" 시각과 언어 1995

      17 에티엔 발리바르, "대중들의 공포" 도서출판b 2008

      18 서동진, "누가 성정치학을 두려워하랴!, In 섹스 포르노 에로티즘: 쾌락의 악몽을 넘어서" 현실문화연구 9-53, 1994

      19 Marcus, Steven, "The Other Victorians: A Study of Sexuality and Pornography in Mid-Nineteenth-Century England" Basic Books 1967

      20 Butler, Judith, "The Force of Fantasy: Feminism, Mapplethorpe, and Discursive Excess, In Feminism and Pornography" Oxford UP 487-508, 2000

      21 Coward, Roth, "Sexual Violence and Sexuality, In Sexuality: A Reader" Virage 307-326, 1987

      22 Russell, Diana E. H., "Pornography and Rape: A Causal Model, In Feminism and Pornography" Oxford UP 48-93, 2000

      23 Dworkin Andrea, "Pornography and Civil Rights: A New Day" Organizing Against Pornography 1988

      24 Carter, Angela, "Polemical Preface: Pornography on the Service of Women, In Feminism and Pornography" Oxford UP 527-539, 2000

      25 MacKinnon, Catharine, "Only Words" Harvard UP 1993

      26 MacKinnon, Catharine, "Not a Moral Issue, In Feminism and Pornography" Oxford UP 169-197, 2000

      27 MacKinnon, Catharine A, "Feminism Unmodified: Discourse on Life and Law" Harvard UP 1987

      28 이재현, "Do the Right thing: 욕설의 진술을 통한 역설의 진술" (봄) : 82-96, 1997

      29 Cornell, Drucilla, "Abortion, Pornography and Sexual Harassment" Routledge 1995

      30 이노우에 세쓰코, "15조원의 육체산업: AV시장을 해부하다" 시네 21북스 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-06-15 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Feminist Studies In English Literature -> The Korean Association For Feminist Studies in English Literature KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.18 0.18 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.11 0.1 0.406 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼