RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      支配 槪念과 X' 構造的 關係 : 格理論을 中心으로 = Government vs. X´-Relations: With Special Reference to Case Theory

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75195636

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to show that Chomskys (1993) attempt at replacing the notion head government with fundamental local X´-theoretic relations has not necessarily been successful, particularly when the Case checking theory of Chomsky (1993) ...

      The purpose of this paper is to show that Chomskys (1993) attempt at replacing the notion head government with fundamental local X´-theoretic relations has not necessarily been successful, particularly when the Case checking theory of Chomsky (1993) is considered, although his project within the minimalist framework has achieved many desirable results.
      The notion government, which has been playing a central role in the overall architecture of GB syntax, reveals its own shortcomings, in that the definition of the general concept of government has lost its catch-all character in the grammar, as pointed out by Park(1989). Furthermore, it raises a conceptual problem since it is formulated on the basis of more or less arbitrary geometric relations rather than of such indispensable relations as X´-relations defined on X´-structure. Granted that structural concepts like government carry out a crucial function in syntactic processes and principles, that does not necessarily justify the existence of the notion of government itself as a fundamental grammatical primitive. In other words, if syntactic processes and principles which allegedly make a crucial use of government are accounted for by some core fundamental relations other than government, we have every right to case doubt on the assumption that the notion government is a conceptual necessity in the grammar.
      In his innovative theory of grammar, commonly called minimalist approach, Chomsky(1993) proposes that head government, one central variation of the more general notion of government, be replaced by the more fundamental notions of X´-theory, namely local X´-theoretic relations to the head of a projection, which seem closer to conceptual necessity. If this move is in the right direction - we believe it is - the concept of head government is now dispensable. The following are the fundamental local X´-theoretic relations that are claimed to substitute for head government :

      (1) a. core relation : head-complement relation
      b. elsewhere relation : Spec-head relation

      Of these two fundamental X´-theoretic relations, Spec-head relation is the one that has a direct bearing on the Case checking theory of Chomsky (1993) (also of Chomsky and Lasnik (1993)). In the Case checking theory, the Case feature of an NP must be checked off by the functional head that also has the relevant Case feature to discharge. The operation of Case checking takes place when an NP bearing a Case feature to be checked off moves - overtly or covertly - into the checking domain of its Case checker. Chomskys (1993) definition of checking domain is based on Spec-head relation, one of the two fundamental X´-relations. It can be pointed out, however, that the checking domain of a head is not always congruent with the Specifier position of that head.
      In configurations such as the one in (2), where no movement of a Case checking head X has taken place, the checking domain of X is congruent with the Specifier position of X.

      (2) XP
      / \
      NP X´
      / \
      X

      a. checking domain of X (MIN (RD(X))) : {NP}
      b. NP-X relation : Spec-head relation

      On the other hand, configurations like (3), where a head Y that has a Case feature to discharge has been adjoined to another head X, which plays a mediating role in the process of Case checking, do not allow congruity between the checking domain of the chain (Yi ,t i ) and the Specifier position.

      (3) XP
      / \
      NP X´
      / \
      X YP
      / \ △
      Yi X ·· ti ···

      a. checking domain of (Yi, ti) (MIN(RD(Yi, ti)) : {NP}
      b. NP-(Yi, ti) relation : ?

      Although the definition of checking domain seems to work precisely as needed, therefore, it does not appear to overcome entirely the same conceptual problem raised by government. That is, it still defines somewhat arbitrary geometric relations when a checking head has moved to adjoin another head with the result that it must be defined with respect to the chain created by the head movement.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 序論
      • II. 支配의 槪念
      • III. X' 理論的 關係
      • 1. X' 理論
      • 2. X' 理論的 關係
      • I. 序論
      • II. 支配의 槪念
      • III. X' 理論的 關係
      • 1. X' 理論
      • 2. X' 理論的 關係
      • IV. 支配, X' 關係 및 格理論
      • V. 結論
      • 參考文獻
      • 英文抄錄
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼