중국어 `都`와 한국어 `다`의 비교 분석 = A comparative analysis of the Chinese `dou` and the Korean `ta`

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present study represents an attempt to compare and contrast the Korean ‘ta’ and Chinese ‘dou’. This study finds out that while they have their own properties, both the words share some features in common. The findings are as follows: (1) Chinese ‘dou’ can occur between a plural subject and its predicate, resulting in universal quantification. Similarly, Korean ‘ta’ also functions as a universal quantifier; (2) Chinese ‘dou’ can quantify wh-words as well, but it seems that Korean ‘ta’ cannot; (3) Chinese ‘dou’ can function as a temporal adverb, referring to ‘already’ or ‘shortly’. Korean ‘ta’ has a similar function, but unlike Chinese ‘dou’, it can be used in an ironic sense, pretending that a given event has already occurred when the event in question cannot happen; (4) Finally, Chinese ‘dou’ with ‘lian’ can refer to ‘even’ and show speakers’ counterexpectation reading and it can have the same interpretation when used alone. Likewise, Korean ‘ta’ with ‘byeol’ has the similar interpretation and it also can be used alone for that interpretation. From these observations, it can be concluded that both the words have many things in common in terms of their syntactic environments, semantic properties, and pragmatic features.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 전칭 양화사로서의 용법
• 3. 정도 부사로서의 용법
• 4. 반어적 용법
• 5. 양태(어기) 부사로서의 용법
• 6. 결론 및 제언
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤나리, "현대중국어 부사 '도' 연구" 연세대학교 대학원 2008

2 왕예평, "한국어 '까지, 조차, 마저'와 중국어 '連…也/都'의 대비 연구" 충남대학교 대학원 2013

3 남기심, "표준국어문법론" 탑출판사 1995

4 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" 두산동아 1999

5 고영근, "특수조사의 의미 분석 –까지, 마저, 조차를 중심으로" 3 : 7-22, 1976

6 徐昌火, "중국어어법사전" 넥서스 2014

7 한글학회, "우리말 사전" 어문각 2008

8 김현주, "양화사 ‘다’의 형성과 의미 확장" 한국어문학국제학술포럼 16 : 1-29, 2011

9 서정수, "시상형태의 의미분석" 3 : 83-158, 1976

10 손남익, "부사사전" 역락 2014

11 성기철, "보조조사 ‘-까지, -조차, -마저’의 의미 특성" 8 : 49-77, 1997

12 구종남, "담화표지 ‘다’에 대하여" 한국언어문학회 (67) : 37-59, 2008

13 이익섭, "국어문법론강의" 학연사 2004

14 홍사만, "국어 특수조사 신연구" 역락 2002

15 임규흥, "국어 정도 부사의 화용화" 언어과학회 24 : 283-302, 2003

16 周利芳, "谈对外汉语副词教学中的语境利用" (3) : 2002

17 崔洪烈, "程度副詞 類義語의 統辭·意味論的 연구" 中央大學校 大學院 1997

18 呂叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" 商务印书馆 2003

19 吕叔湘, "現代漢語八百詞" 商务印书馆 2003

20 모해연, "漢韓語中全稱量化詞的對比 ―以“都”和“모두/다”的對比爲中心" 중국어문학연구회 (41) : 129-143, 2006

21 曹逢甫, "功能主义和汉语语法" 语言学院出版社 1994

22 张亚军, "副词与限定描状功能" 安徽教育出版社 2002

23 곽상, "副詞“都”的來源及語法化過程" 중국어문학연구회 (79) : 105-116, 2013

24 蔣靜, "“都”總括全量手段的演變及其分類" 4 : 72-76, 2003

25 Hopper, Paul J., "Grammaticalization" Cambridge University Press 1993