This paper explores strategic R&D policy when countries’ regimes on protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are exogenously given under the multilaterally agreed disciplines. Under the weak enforcement regime, domestic and foreign R&D ac...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper explores strategic R&D policy when countries’ regimes on protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are exogenously given under the multilaterally agreed disciplines. Under the weak enforcement regime, domestic and foreign R&D ac...
This paper explores strategic R&D policy when countries’ regimes on
protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are exogenously given under
the multilaterally agreed disciplines. Under the weak enforcement regime,
domestic and foreign R&D activities are strategic complements rather than
strategic substitutes and hence R&D reaction curves are upward sloping.
Government wishes to subsidize its domestic firm’s R&D in the presence of
sufficiently weak IPR protection, because it is able to encourage R&D by the
foreign rival firm, and greater R&D investment of foreign rivals increases
the profits of the domestic firm.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper explores strategic R&D policy when countries’ regimes on protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are exogenously given under the multilaterally agreed disciplines. Under the weak enforcement regime, domestic and foreign R&D activ...
This paper explores strategic R&D policy when countries’ regimes on
protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) are exogenously given under
the multilaterally agreed disciplines. Under the weak enforcement regime,
domestic and foreign R&D activities are strategic complements rather than
strategic substitutes and hence R&D reaction curves are upward sloping.
Government wishes to subsidize its domestic firm’s R&D in the presence of
sufficiently weak IPR protection, because it is able to encourage R&D by the
foreign rival firm, and greater R&D investment of foreign rivals increases
the profits of the domestic firm.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Kang, M., "Understanding Agreements on TRIPS and Subsidies in Tandem"
2 Kang, M., "Trade Policy Mix: IPR Protection and R&D Subsidies" 39 : 744-757, 2006
3 Bagwell, K., "The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Oligopolistic Industries" 36 : 133-150, 1994
4 Bagwell, K., "The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Battles for Monopoly" 33 : 795-816, 1992
5 Maggi, G., "Strategic Trade Policy under Incomplete Information" 40 : 571-594, 1999
6 Maggi, G., "Strategic Trade Policies with Endogenous Mode of Competition" 86 : 237-258, 1996
7 United States Trade Representative, "Special 301 Report 2008" USTR 2008
8 Spencer, B. J., "International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy" 50 : 707-722, 1983
9 Muniagurria, M. E., "Foreign Technology, Spillovers, and R&D Policy" 38 : 405-430, 1997
10 D’Aspremont, C., "Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Erratum" 80 : 641-642, 1990
1 Kang, M., "Understanding Agreements on TRIPS and Subsidies in Tandem"
2 Kang, M., "Trade Policy Mix: IPR Protection and R&D Subsidies" 39 : 744-757, 2006
3 Bagwell, K., "The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Oligopolistic Industries" 36 : 133-150, 1994
4 Bagwell, K., "The Sensitivity of Strategic and Corrective R&D Policy in Battles for Monopoly" 33 : 795-816, 1992
5 Maggi, G., "Strategic Trade Policy under Incomplete Information" 40 : 571-594, 1999
6 Maggi, G., "Strategic Trade Policies with Endogenous Mode of Competition" 86 : 237-258, 1996
7 United States Trade Representative, "Special 301 Report 2008" USTR 2008
8 Spencer, B. J., "International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy" 50 : 707-722, 1983
9 Muniagurria, M. E., "Foreign Technology, Spillovers, and R&D Policy" 38 : 405-430, 1997
10 D’Aspremont, C., "Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers: Erratum" 80 : 641-642, 1990
11 D’Aspremont, C., "Cooperative and Non-cooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers" 78 : 1133-1137, 1988
Economic Growth and Technology Diffusion in Developing Countries
Asymmetry and Long Memory Features in Volatility: Evidence From Korean Stock Market
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.45 | 0.39 | 0.37 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.32 | 0.28 | 0.868 | 0 |