荀子性惡論的四重辨析 = A Four Dimensionsal Analysis of Xunzi’s Views on Human Nature

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the Pre-Qin period, the theory of human nature was a key subject addressed by Chinese philosophers, including Xunzi. Xunzi’s theory of human nature showed clear differences from the views held by Mengzi. Xunzi believed that human nature is evil, and draining good from human nature by accepting human instinct and correct standards. The essay will discuss Xunzi’s theory of xingelun in greater detail, analyzing it in four crucial dimensions, and will also place his views within the larger context of other Pre-Qin Chinese theories of human nature.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

早在先秦，人性問題就成為中國哲學家津津樂道的熱門話題，荀子便在其中。荀子主張人性惡，並從概念範疇、人之本能、立論標準等不同角度將善從人性中剔除。荀子的性惡論透射出荀子對人性的思考有別於孟子等人。本文擬從人性論證、荀學風采、儒家神韻和先秦特質等四個不同維度辨析荀子的性惡論，進而透視先秦性學說以及中國人性學說的特徵。

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 韓非, "韓非子校注" 江蘇人民出版社 1982

2 楊伯峻, "論語譯注" 中華書局 1980

3 莊子, "莊子淺注" 中華書局 1982

4 荀子, "荀子集解" 中華書局 1996

5 老子, "老子正詁" 中華書局 1959

6 楊天宇, "禮記譯注" 上海古籍出版社 1997

7 孟子, "孟子譯注" 中華書局 1960

8 墨子, "墨子" 上海古籍出版社 1995

9 烏恩溥, "四書譯注" 吉林文史出版社 1996

10 商鞅, "商君書注譯" 中華書局 1974