RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      Clinical significance of revised microscopic positive resection margin status in ductal adenocarcinoma of pancreatic head

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105960807

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Recent studies have suggested microscopic positive resection margin should be revised according to the presence of tumor cells within 1mm of the margin surface in resected specimens of pancreatic cancer. However, the clinical meaning of this revised margin status for R1 resection margin was not fully clarified.
      Methods: From July 2012 to December 2014, the medical records of 194 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into 3 groups on margin status; revised microscopic negative margin (rR0) – tumor exists more than 1 mm from surgical margin, revised microscopic positive margin (rR1) – tumor present within less than 1 mm from surgical margin, classic microscopic positive margin (cR1) – tumor is exposed to surgical margin.
      Results: There were 76 rR0 (39.2%), 100 rR1 (51.5%), and 18 cR1 (9.3%). There was significant difference in disease-free survival rates between cR1 vs. rR1 (8.4 months vs. 24.0 months, P = 0.013). Margin status correlated with local recurrence rate (17.1% in rR0, 26.0% in rR1, and 44.4% in cR1, P = 0.048). There is significant difference in recurrence at tumor bed (11.8% in rR0 vs. 23.0 in rR1, P = 0.050). Of rR1, adjuvant treatment was found to be an independent risk factor for local recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.297; 95% confidence interval, 0.127–0.693, P = 0.005).
      Conclusion: Revised R1 resection margin (rR1) affects recurrence at the tumor bed. Adjuvant treatment significantly reduced local recurrence of rR1. Accordingly, adjuvant chemoradiation for rR1 group should be taken into account.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Recent studies have suggested microscopic positive resection margin should be revised according to the presence of tumor cells within 1mm of the margin surface in resected specimens of pancreatic cancer. However, the clinical meaning of this ...

      Purpose: Recent studies have suggested microscopic positive resection margin should be revised according to the presence of tumor cells within 1mm of the margin surface in resected specimens of pancreatic cancer. However, the clinical meaning of this revised margin status for R1 resection margin was not fully clarified.
      Methods: From July 2012 to December 2014, the medical records of 194 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided into 3 groups on margin status; revised microscopic negative margin (rR0) – tumor exists more than 1 mm from surgical margin, revised microscopic positive margin (rR1) – tumor present within less than 1 mm from surgical margin, classic microscopic positive margin (cR1) – tumor is exposed to surgical margin.
      Results: There were 76 rR0 (39.2%), 100 rR1 (51.5%), and 18 cR1 (9.3%). There was significant difference in disease-free survival rates between cR1 vs. rR1 (8.4 months vs. 24.0 months, P = 0.013). Margin status correlated with local recurrence rate (17.1% in rR0, 26.0% in rR1, and 44.4% in cR1, P = 0.048). There is significant difference in recurrence at tumor bed (11.8% in rR0 vs. 23.0 in rR1, P = 0.050). Of rR1, adjuvant treatment was found to be an independent risk factor for local recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.297; 95% confidence interval, 0.127–0.693, P = 0.005).
      Conclusion: Revised R1 resection margin (rR1) affects recurrence at the tumor bed. Adjuvant treatment significantly reduced local recurrence of rR1. Accordingly, adjuvant chemoradiation for rR1 group should be taken into account.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Verbeke CS, "Tumour growth is more dispersed in pancreatic head cancers than in rectal cancer : implications for resection margin assessment" 59 : 1111-1121, 2011

      2 Jamieson NB, "The prognostic influence of resection margin clearance following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma" 17 : 511-521, 2013

      3 Sobin LH, "TNM classification of malignant tumours" Wiley & Sons 2009

      4 Sperti C, "Survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas" 83 : 625-631, 1996

      5 The Royal College of Pathologists, "Standards and datasets for reporting cancers. Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of vater and bile duct carcinoma" Royal College of Pathologists 2002

      6 Gebauer F, "Resection margin clearance in pancreatic cancer after implementation of the Leeds Pathology Protocol(LEEPP) : clinically relevant or just academic" 39 : 493-499, 2015

      7 Sohn TA, "Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients : results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators" 4 : 567-579, 2000

      8 Verbeke CS, "Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer" 93 : 1232-1237, 2006

      9 Jamieson NB, "Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma" 251 : 1003-1010, 2010

      10 Hishinuma S, "Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings" 10 : 511-518, 2006

      1 Verbeke CS, "Tumour growth is more dispersed in pancreatic head cancers than in rectal cancer : implications for resection margin assessment" 59 : 1111-1121, 2011

      2 Jamieson NB, "The prognostic influence of resection margin clearance following pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma" 17 : 511-521, 2013

      3 Sobin LH, "TNM classification of malignant tumours" Wiley & Sons 2009

      4 Sperti C, "Survival after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas" 83 : 625-631, 1996

      5 The Royal College of Pathologists, "Standards and datasets for reporting cancers. Minimum dataset for the histopathological reporting of pancreatic, ampulla of vater and bile duct carcinoma" Royal College of Pathologists 2002

      6 Gebauer F, "Resection margin clearance in pancreatic cancer after implementation of the Leeds Pathology Protocol(LEEPP) : clinically relevant or just academic" 39 : 493-499, 2015

      7 Sohn TA, "Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients : results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators" 4 : 567-579, 2000

      8 Verbeke CS, "Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer" 93 : 1232-1237, 2006

      9 Jamieson NB, "Positive mobilization margins alone do not influence survival following pancreatico-duodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma" 251 : 1003-1010, 2010

      10 Hishinuma S, "Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings" 10 : 511-518, 2006

      11 Delpero JR, "Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens" 16 : 20-33, 2014

      12 Yeo CJ, "Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients" 221 : 721-731, 1995

      13 Konstantinidis IT, "Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma : is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a"true"R0 resection" 257 : 731-736, 2013

      14 Hartwig W, "Pancreatic cancer surgery in the new millennium : better prediction of outcome" 254 : 311-319, 2011

      15 Strobel O, "Pancreatic cancer surgery : the new R-status counts" 265 : 565-573, 2017

      16 Merkow RP, "National assessment of margin status as a quality indicator after pancreatic cancer surgery" 21 : 1067-1074, 2014

      17 Esposito I, "Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections" 15 : 1651-1660, 2008

      18 Chandrasegaram MD, "Metaanalysis of radical resection rates and margin assessment in pancreatic cancer" 102 : 1459-1472, 2015

      19 Sugiura T, "Margin status, recurrence pattern, and prognosis after resection of pancreatic cancer" 154 : 1078-1086, 2013

      20 Chang DK, "Margin clearance and outcome in resected pancreatic cancer" 27 : 2855-2862, 2009

      21 Bassi C, "Influence of surgical resection and post-operative complications on survival following adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial" 22 : 353-363, 2005

      22 Butturini G, "Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer : meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials" 143 : 75-83, 2008

      23 Menon KV, "Impact of margin status on survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer: the Leeds Pathology Protocol (LEEPP)" 11 : 18-24, 2009

      24 Campbell F, "Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer : the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin" 55 : 277-283, 2009

      25 Bockhorn M, "Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer : a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery(ISGPS)" 155 : 977-988, 2014

      26 Neoptolemos JP, "Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection : a randomized controlled trial" 304 : 1073-1081, 2010

      27 Winter JM, "1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer : a single-institution experience" 10 : 1199-1210, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-11-12 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한외과학회지 -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-12-30 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of The Korean Surgical Society -> Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.39 0.21 0.97
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.73 0.56 0.328 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼