쌍대반응표면최적화의 방법론 및 응용 = A Literature Review

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Dual response surface optimization (DRSO), inspired by Taguchi’s philosophy, attempts to optimize the process mean and variability by using response surface methodology. Researches on DRSO were extensively done in 1990’s and have been matured recently. This paper reviews the existing DRSO methods from the decision making perspective. More specifically, this paper classifies the existing DRSO methods based on the optimization criterion and the timing of preference articulation. Also, some of case studies are reviewed. Extension to multiresponse optimization, triple response surface optimization, and application of data mining method are suggested as future research issues.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Yeniaya, O, "Using dual response surfaces to reduce variability in launch vehicle design : A case study" 91 : 407-412, 2006

2 Shin, S, "Studies on a biobjective robust design optimization problem" 41 : 957-968, 2009

3 Pignatiello, J, "Strategies for Robust Multiresponse Quality Engineering" 25 (25): 5-15, 1993

4 Yang, T, "Solving a multiresponse simulation problem using a dual-response system and scatter search method" 13 (13): 356-369, 2005

5 Derringer, G, "Simultaneous optimization of several response variables" 12 : 214-219, 1980

6 Costa, N, "Simultaneous Optimization of Mean and Standard Deviation" 22 : 140-149, 2010

7 Shin, S, "Robust design models for customerspecified bounds on process parameters" 15 : 2-18, 2006

8 Myers, R. H, "Response Surface Methods for Dual Response Systems" 15 (15): 301-307, 1973

9 Cho, B. R, "Quality improve ment by RSM Modeling for Robust Design" 650-655, 1996

10 Jeyapaul, R, "Quality Management Research by Considering Multi-response Problems in the Taguchi Method : a Review" 26 : 1331-1337, 2005

11 Tong, L, "Optimizing Dynamic Multiresponse Problems Using the Dual-Response-Surface Method" 14 (14): 115-125, 2002

12 Chen, W, "Optimization of plastic injection molding process by dual response surface method with nonlinear programming" 27 (27): 951-966, 2010

13 Kim, K, "Optimization of Multiple Responses Considering Both Location and Dispersion Effects" 169 : 133-145, 2006

14 Kim, D, "Optimization of GMA welding process using the dual response approach" 41 (41): 4505-4515, 2003

15 Jeong, I, "Optimal Weighting of Bias and Variance in Dual Response Surface Optimization" 37 (37): 236-247, 2005

16 Hwang, C. L, "Multiple Objective Decision Making-Methods and Applications : A State of the Art Survey" Springer-Verlag 1979

17 Borror, C. M, "Mean and variance modeling with qualitative responses : A case study" 11 (11): 141-148, 1998

18 Koksoy, O, "Joint Optimization of Mean and Standard Deviation Using Response Surface Methods" 35 (35): 239-252, 2003

19 Lee, D, "Interactive Weighting of Bias and Variance in Dual Response Surface Optimization" 39 (39): 5900-5906, 2012

20 Shin, S, "Integrating a biobjective paradigm to tolerance optimization" 45 (45): 5509-5525, 2007

21 Ding, R, "Dual-Response Surface Optimization : A Weighted MSE Approach" 16 (16): 377-385, 2004

22 Coetzer, R. L. J, "Dual response surface optimization with hard-to-control variables for sustainable gasifier performance" 57 (57): 567-587, 2008

23 Kim, K, "Dual Response Surface Optimization : A Fuzzy Modeling Approach" 30 (30): 1998

24 Lin, D. and Tu, W., "Dual Response Surface Optimization" 27 (27): 34-39, 1995

25 Wahdame, B., "Dual Response Surface Approach for the Analysis of a Fuel Cell Durability Test, IEEE Industrial Electronics, IECON 2006-32nd Annual Conference on" 4337-4342, 2006

26 Copeland, K. A, "Dual Response Optimization via Direct Function Minimization" 28 (28): 331-336, 1996

27 Kim, Y, "Development of Priority-Based Robust Design" 14 (14): 355-363, 2002

28 Lee, D, "Determining the target value of ACICD to optimize the electrical characteristics of semiconductors using dual response surface optimization" John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 29 (29): 377-386, 2013

29 Vining, G. G, "Combining Taguchi and Response Surface Philosophies : A Dual Response Approach" 22 (22): 38-45, 1990

30 Jeong, I, "Bayesian Analysis for Weighted Mean-Squared Error in Dual Response Surface Optimization" 26 (26): 417-430, 2010

31 Ardakani, M. K, "An Overview of Optimization Formulations for Multiresponse Surface Problems" 29 : 3-16, 2012

32 Lee, D, "An Interactive Method to Multiresponse Surface Optimization Based on Pairwise Comparisons" 44 (44): 13-26, 2012

33 Luner, J. J, "Achieving Continuous Improvement with the Dual Response Approach : A Demonstration of the Roman Catapult" 6 (6): 691-705, 1994

34 Tang, L. C, "A Unified Approach for Dual Response Surface Optimization" 34 (34): 437-447, 2002

35 Lee, D, "A Review on Posterior and Interactive Solution Selection Methods to Multiresponse Surface Optimization" 18 (18): 279-301, 2011

36 Murphy, T. E, "A Review of Robust Design Methods for Multiple Responses" 15 : 201-215, 2005

37 Lee, D, "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Multiresponse Surface Optimization" 210 (210): 301-309, 2011

38 Lee, D, "A Posterior Preference Articulation Approach to Dual-Response Surface Optimization" 42 (42): 161-171, 2010

39 Ko, Y, "A New Loss Function-Based Method for Multiresponse Optimization" 37 (37): 50-59, 2005