효과적인 내부통제 체제 구축을 위한 입법적 과제 = The Legislative Reform for the Institution of Effective Internal Control System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  Many corporations in U.S. and Japan have long been acquiring concern with Internal Control System, for promoting efficiency, reducing risk of asset loss and helping ensure compliance with laws and regulations. Internal Controls means different things to different people. This causes confusion among businesspeople legislators, lawyers and others. According to Internal Control-Integrated Framework that COSO(the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission) issued in 1992, Internal Control System is broadly defined as a process, effected by an entity"s board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in effectiveness and efficiency of operations, reliability of financing reporting, compliance with appliable laws and regulations. This framework consists of five interrelated components; control environmentㆍrisk assessmentㆍcontrol activities？information and communicationㆍmonitoring. The Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002 in the U.S. extends the long-standing requirement for public companies to maintain systems of Internal Control, requiring management to certify and the independent auditor to attest to the effectiveness of those system. Recent years have seen heightened concern and focus on risk management. The COSO"s Report of 2004(Internal Control- Enterprise Risk Management -Integrated Framework) say that Internal Control is an integral park of enterprise risk management. Japan Corporation Law of 2005, also, was enacted including the duty on board of directors in institution of an effective Internal Control System.<BR>  This article deals with the legislative reform of Korean Commercial Law and finance related law in Korea, to help enterprises enhance their Internal Control System and control their activities in moving toward achievement of their established objectives. I emphasize that the duty of institution of Internal Control System is accountable to the board of directors on large corporation and the need for Internal Control Policy (Rule) like the COSO"s Report, providing concepts and key principles and clear direction and guidance, become more compelling.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 (내부통제 체제 법제화의 논의 배경)
  Ⅱ. 내부통제제도에 관한 일반론
  Ⅲ. 내부통제 관련 법제에 대한 비교법적 고찰 - 미국과 일본을 중심으로 -
  Ⅳ. 내부통제제도에 관한 우리 현행 법제의 문제점과 입법적 개선방안
  Ⅴ. 결론
  참고 문헌
  〈Abstract〉
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 황성식, "효과적인 내부통제를 통한 주주가지의 제고" (4) : 2004.3

2 "회사법강의 제13판" 박영사 2006

3 "회계감사와 내부통제" 2005.6

4 "증권거래법제3판" 두성사 2004

5 "준법감시인제도 운영현황 파악-실태조사 및 분석" 한국증권업협회 조사국제부 2003.12

6 "전사리스크관리와 내부감사의 역할" 2005.10

7 "상법강의 상제9판" 박영사 2006

8 "상법(회사편)개정 공청회 자료집" 법무부 2006.7

9 "법적 시각에서 본 내부통제" (4) : 2004.3

10 "미국법상 이사의 감시의무와 위반책임" 20 (20): 2001

11 "내부회계관리제도 모범규준의 활용" 통 (통): 2005.12

12 "내부통제시스템의 구축방안 및 정책적 의의-주제2 내부통제시스템의 법률적 의의와 정책적 인센티브"

13 "내부통제시스템의 구축방안 및 정책적 의의-주제1 내부통제시스템의 운영과 경영자 책임"

14 "내부통제개념의 변천과 국제적 동향-미국과 일본의 경우를 중심으로" 21 : 2004.2

15 "경영환경변화에 적응한 내부감사의 미래상" 2003.5

16 "新會社法 內部統制とその開示" 中央經濟社 2005

17 "大和銀行代表訴訟事件1審判決と代表訴訟制度改正問題上" 2004

18 "取締役の監視義務" 200.10

19 "コポレトガバナンス及びリスク管理內部統制に關する開示評價の組について-構築及び開示のための指針"

20 "http;//fsahanbook.info/FSA/index.jsp"

21 "http://www.pcaobus.org/Standatds/index.aspx"

22 "http://www.coso.org/publications/executive_summary_integrated_framework.htm"

23 "http://www.coso.org/Publications/ERM/COSO_ERM_ExecutiveSummary.pdf"

24 "http://dtm.fss.or.kr/kor/dtm/gsa/guma_l.jsp?gubun=01&menu-dtm080100"

25 "Senior Management Arrangements, Systems and Controls" 2004