RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      한국의 수출드라이버정책과 종합상사제도 도입에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Introduction of GTC System and The Export Drive Policy in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104832036

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this study, we find that, with the successful process of the three series of “5-year economic development plans,” Korean economy made a fast economic growth following rapid export increase in 60s and the early 70s. In particular, Korean economy of the time was definitely meeting with extensive heavy and chemical industrialization based on the economic growth strategy which is called “Export Drive Policy.” However, in the face of the collapse of the Bretton Woods System in the early 1970s and the international monetary crisis, Nixon Shock, World Oil crisis and so on, global economic order fell into disorder. Especially, some developed countries used the new protectionism in defense of domestic industry and it reduced global export market. This trend became the cause of crisis to export-oriented strategy of Korea which has a high foreign resource dependent, high population density. Facing the situation as above, the Korean government started to actively seek a way to cope with domestic and foreign environment changes of economy in the early 70s and to seek continuous extension of export. This study clearly showed that the correlation of these factors with the introduction of GTC appointment system in April, 1975. Above all, this research analyzed the contents and supporting policy of GTC appointment system along with the influence on the appointed GTC by examining the case of Samsung Corporation. In particular, through the study of the GTC specified system in Korea, it can be seen that a variety of conditions and requirements. That is, for the conventional trading company is specified by the state was to GTC have the following requirements. 1) annual export earnings $ 50 million or more, and 2) more than the number seven exports over 50 million US dollars, 3) export may state more than one million dollars over 10 countries, and 4) the number of foreign subsidiaries more than 10 points, 5) Capital requirements had to be met in the light 10 billion or more. Samsung Corporation noted in this study that were already equipped with the specified requirements of the already. That is, GTC 1975 Samsung Corporation at the time of application are: 1) this was a $ 52 million annual export earnings, and 2) exports were more than $ 500,000 has 9 items. As well as 3) was the number of countries exporting more than $ 1 million in 13 countries, 4) 11 Number of foreign branch, 5) capital of 1 billion won was the scale. Through this process, Samsung Corporation has been designated as Korea’s first GTC.
      번역하기

      In this study, we find that, with the successful process of the three series of “5-year economic development plans,” Korean economy made a fast economic growth following rapid export increase in 60s and the early 70s. In particular, Korean economy...

      In this study, we find that, with the successful process of the three series of “5-year economic development plans,” Korean economy made a fast economic growth following rapid export increase in 60s and the early 70s. In particular, Korean economy of the time was definitely meeting with extensive heavy and chemical industrialization based on the economic growth strategy which is called “Export Drive Policy.” However, in the face of the collapse of the Bretton Woods System in the early 1970s and the international monetary crisis, Nixon Shock, World Oil crisis and so on, global economic order fell into disorder. Especially, some developed countries used the new protectionism in defense of domestic industry and it reduced global export market. This trend became the cause of crisis to export-oriented strategy of Korea which has a high foreign resource dependent, high population density. Facing the situation as above, the Korean government started to actively seek a way to cope with domestic and foreign environment changes of economy in the early 70s and to seek continuous extension of export. This study clearly showed that the correlation of these factors with the introduction of GTC appointment system in April, 1975. Above all, this research analyzed the contents and supporting policy of GTC appointment system along with the influence on the appointed GTC by examining the case of Samsung Corporation. In particular, through the study of the GTC specified system in Korea, it can be seen that a variety of conditions and requirements. That is, for the conventional trading company is specified by the state was to GTC have the following requirements. 1) annual export earnings $ 50 million or more, and 2) more than the number seven exports over 50 million US dollars, 3) export may state more than one million dollars over 10 countries, and 4) the number of foreign subsidiaries more than 10 points, 5) Capital requirements had to be met in the light 10 billion or more. Samsung Corporation noted in this study that were already equipped with the specified requirements of the already. That is, GTC 1975 Samsung Corporation at the time of application are: 1) this was a $ 52 million annual export earnings, and 2) exports were more than $ 500,000 has 9 items. As well as 3) was the number of countries exporting more than $ 1 million in 13 countries, 4) 11 Number of foreign branch, 5) capital of 1 billion won was the scale. Through this process, Samsung Corporation has been designated as Korea’s first GTC.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 조동성, "한국의 종합무역상사(하)" 법문사 1984

      2 조동성, "한국의 종합무역상사(상)" 법문사 21-33, 1984

      3 조동성, "한국의 종합무역상사" 법문사 1984

      4 한국산업은행조사부, "한국산업경제 10년사"

      5 한국무역협회, "한국무역사"

      6 박필수, "한국무역론" 법문사 1992

      7 대한상공회의소, "한국기업의 성장전략과 경영구조" 1987

      8 이헌창, "한국경제통사" 해남 2012

      9 전국경제인연합회, "한국경제정책40년사"

      10 전국경제인연합회, "한국경제정책30년사"

      1 조동성, "한국의 종합무역상사(하)" 법문사 1984

      2 조동성, "한국의 종합무역상사(상)" 법문사 21-33, 1984

      3 조동성, "한국의 종합무역상사" 법문사 1984

      4 한국산업은행조사부, "한국산업경제 10년사"

      5 한국무역협회, "한국무역사"

      6 박필수, "한국무역론" 법문사 1992

      7 대한상공회의소, "한국기업의 성장전략과 경영구조" 1987

      8 이헌창, "한국경제통사" 해남 2012

      9 전국경제인연합회, "한국경제정책40년사"

      10 전국경제인연합회, "한국경제정책30년사"

      11 김안호, "한국경제의 이해" 두남 2002

      12 구본호, "한국경제의 역사적 조명" 한국개발연구원 1991

      13 문병집, "한국경제론-이론과 실제" 법문사 2001

      14 윤석범, "한국경제론 강의" 세경사 2001

      15 이만기, "한국경제론" 일신사 1984

      16 한국개발연구원, "한국경제 반세기: 역사적 평가와 21세기 비전, 광복50주년 국제세미나 자료집" 1995

      17 대한상공회의소, "한국경제 20년의 회고와 반성" 1982

      18 이종윤, "종합상사론" 법문사 1987

      19 삼성물산주식회사, "종합상사 20년사"

      20 종합무역상사협의회, "종합무역상사의 장기발전방향"

      21 한국경제연구센터, "종합무역상사의 기능다양화방안" 1977

      22 한승수, "수출주도형경제에 관한 제이론과 모형" 서울대학교경제연소 16 (16): 124-155, 1982

      23 삼성그룹, "삼성50년사"

      24 상공부 무역정책연구회, "대외무역법" 법문사 1989

      25 한국은행, "경제통계연보"

      26 경제기획원, "경제백서"

      27 瀬島龍三, "韓国に於ける総合商社創設計画について(私の愚見)"

      28 御園生等, "總合商社は斜陽化であるか" 54-62, 1961

      29 서울신문, "“종합상사 시리즈” 관련기사"

      30 경향신문, "“종합무역상사 지정” 관련기사, 국가기록원 및 인터넷 관련자료 등 참조"

      31 김영래, "Discussion of the GTC, Seoul : Beopmunsa" 법문사 101-, 1997

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.55 0.55 0.47
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.47 0.46 0.727 0.13
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼