은유해석모델 = A Model of Metaphor Interpretation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims to suggest a unified model of metaphor interpretation that reconciles two competing models, conceptual metaphor model and attributive categorization model. There has been much debate about which model offers the most veridical account of how people interpret metaphors. But there is the possibility of reconciling two rival models. Proponents of conceptual metaphor and attributive categorization models of metaphor have differently sampled metaphors. Proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen relational and double metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen double and attributional metaphors. Also proponents of conceptual metaphor model have chosen novel and conventional metaphors, but proponents of attributive categorization model have chosen conventional and dead metaphors. I here offer a unified model of metaphor interpretation (31). In model (31) there are three types of metaphor. Type 1 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode, type 2 metaphors are interpreted in a comparison mode in some contexts and in a categorization mode in other contexts. and type 3 metaphors are interpreted in a categorization mode. Type 1 is novel, relational metaphors, type 2 is conventional, double metaphors, and type 3 is dead, attributional metaphors.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Lakoff,G, "Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind" University of Chicago Press 1987

2 Glucksberg, S., "Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity" 97 : 3-18, 1990

3 Gibbs, R. W, "The poetics of mind" Cambridge University Press 1994

4 Kovecses,Z, "The language of love" Bucknell University Press 1988

5 Lakoff,G, "The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and thought (2nd ed)" Cambridge University Press 202-251, 1993

6 Johnson,M, "The body in the mind: The bodily basis of reason and imagination" University of Chicago press 1987

7 Chomsky,N, "Some methodological remarks on generative grammar" 17 : 219-239, 1961

8 Murphy,G, "Reasons to doubt the present evidence for metaphoric representation" 62 : 99-108, 1996

9 Glucksberg, s., "Property attribution in metaphor comprehension" 36 : 50-67, 1997

10 Glucksberg, S., "On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors?" 21 : 85-98, 1982

11 Gildea, P., "On understanding metaphor: The role of context" 22 : 577-590, 1983

12 Lakoff, G., "More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor" University of Chicago Press 1989

13 Black,M, "More about Metaphor, in Metaphor and Thought" Cambridge University Press 19-43, 1979

14 Lakoff, G., "Metaphors we live by" University of Chicago 1980

15 Thomas, M., "Metaphor as categorization: A connectionist implementation" 16 : 5-27, 2001

16 Grice,H.P, "Logic and Conversation in Syntax and Semantics" 3 : 41-58, 1975

17 Ortony, A., "Interpreting metaphors and idioms: some effects of context on comprehension" 17 : 465-477, 1978

18 Glucksberg, S., "How metaphors work. In Metaphor and thought (2nd ed)" Cambridge University Press 401-424, 1993

19 Gentner, D., "Evidence for relational selectivity in interpreting analogy and metaphor. In The psychology of learning and motivation" Academic 307-358, 1988

20 Turner,M, "Death is the mother of beauty" University of Chicago Press 1987

21 Gentner, D, "Convention, Form, and Figurative Language Processing" 16 : 223-247, 2001

22 Inhoff, A., "Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in reading" 12 : 558-567, 1984

23 McGlone,M.S, "Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought" 35 : 544-565, 1996

24 Gibbs,R.W, "Categorization and metaphor understanding" 99 : 572-577, 1992

25 Ortony,A, "Beyond literal similarity" 86 : 161-180, 1979

26 Glucksberg,S, "Beyond literal meanings: The psychology of allusion" 2 : 146-152, 1991

27 Tourangeau, R., "Aptness in metaphor" 13 : 27-55, 1981

28 Bortfeld, H, "A cross-linguistic analysis of idiom comprehension by native and non-native speakers" 59 : 432-, 1998