1 "Softcopy versus hard copy findings in digital mammography" 42 : 265-269, 2002
2 "Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography:comparison in the patients with microcalcifications" 6 : 214-220, 2005
3 "Screen film vs full-field digital mammography:image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions" 12 : 1697-1702, 2002
4 "Magnificationmammography:a comparison of full-field digital mammographyand screen-film mammography for the detection of simulatedsmall masses and microcalcifications" 12 : 2188-2191, 2002
5 "Hard- versus soft-copy interpretation" 227 : 629-630, 2003
6 "Digital mammography:observer perfor-mance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterizationof malignant and benign microcalcifications" 8 : 454-466, 2001
7 "Diagnostic performance of digital versus filmmammography for breast-cancer screening" 353 : 1773-1783, 2005
8 "Comparison of full-field digital mammographyto screen-film mammography for cancer detection:results of4945 paired examinations" 218 : 873-880, 2001
9 "Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimens" 9 : 1378-1382, 2002
10 "Comparative study in patients withmicrocalcifications:full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography" 12 : 2679-2683, 2002