축구감독의 권력기반에 대한 선수의 인식 = Soccer Coach Power and Authority as Recognized by Soccer Players

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to identify how soccer players recognize their head coach’s power and authority in relation to soccer players’ background and experiences and then to establish an effective base for head coaches’ authority. The conclusions of the research and data analyses are as follows.
First, an examination of the soccer player’s recognition of a head soccer coach’s authority by their team affiliation showed significant differences in the soccer player’s perception in all areas of a coach’s authorities: compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power, consultation power, and reward power. While both consultation power and reward power are least recognized amongst adult soccer players; compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power are realized most amongst middle school soccer players. Second, in relation to the soccer player’s position, there was no substantial distinction on the perception in all areas of a coach’s authorities; while, a significant difference was seen on professional power amongst the adult division soccer players.
Third, an examination of the soccer player’s differential view of a head soccer coach’s authority, with reference to whether the player is a key player or not, was performed and found that the consultation power was most significant amongst the middle school key players as compared to non-key players. And significant differences were seen on both compulsory power and professional power amongst high school non-key players as opposed to key players. Fourth, in relation to the grades of soccer players, middle school quarter-final players in lower division teams recognized a coach’s reward power more than the middle school quarter-final upper division teams.
Both professional power and legitimate power were perceived more amongst high school quarter-final teams or upper division teams as compared to quarter-final or lower division teams. Fifth, between Korean soccer players and foreign soccer players, significant differences were evident in the perception of a coach’s authority in all areas of compulsory power, professional power, legitimate power, consultation power, and reward power of the coach.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 연구방법
• Ⅲ. 결과
• Ⅳ. 논의
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Rahim, M. A., 15 : 545-556, 1989

2 성병창, "학교장의 권력기반과 교사의 호응성과의 관계에 관한 연구" 釜山大學校 大學院 1986

3 윤산일, "축구지도자의 역할지각과 직무만족의 관계" 수원대학교 교육대학원 2007

4 대한축구협회, "축구지도자 현황 및 한국축구사" 대한축구협회 2012

5 김영철, "축구 팀 지도자에 대한 신뢰가 팀 성적에 미치는 영향" 용인대학교 대학원 2008

6 김흥만, "축구 팀 감독에 대한 신뢰와 성적과의 관계" 연세대학교 대학원 2005

7 윤종남, "초등학교장의 권력기반에 관한 연구" 경남대학교 교육대학원 2000

8 金南杓, "초등학교 교사가 지각한 학교장의 권력기반과 권한위임과의 관계" 韓國敎員大學校 大學院 1997

9 박성희, "초기상담에서 내담자가 지각한 상담자의 권력기반 크기에 따른 상담효과의 차이" 경남대학교 교육대학원 2006

10 박양동, "중등 담임교사의 권력기반에 따른 학생의 규범준수, 학교만족도 및 성적" 경남대학교 교육대학원 2007

11 김수자, "대한민국 초기 이승만의 권력기반 강화과정 연구" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2004

12 최옥진, "내셔널리그 축구감독들의 권력기반 효과에 관한 연구" 한국스포츠학회 10 (10): 1-8, 2012

13 임영숙, "교사가 지각하는 중등학교장의 권력기반 크기에 따른 교사의 직무만족도" 경남대학교 교육대학원 2005

14 French, J. R. P., "The bases of social power, In Studies in social power" Institude for Social Research 150-167, 1959

15 Krausz, R. R., "Power and Leadership in organizations" 16 : 85-94, 1986

16 Yukl, G. A., "Leadership in organizations" Prentice Hall 1981

17 Bierstadt, R., "An Analysis of School Power" 15 : 730-736, 1950

18 Lymas, L. W., "A study of the use of power by middle school and high school principals and its relationship to teacher satisfaction with work and with principal" University of Maryland Press 1992