RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일제강점기에 발생한 불법행위책임에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Responsibility for Illegal Acts During the Japanese Occupation - focusing on extinctive prescription -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99569892

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      So far we have seen that when a Korean files the suit against Japan to the Japanese court in its responsibility for illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation, it is deemed to be the extinctive prescription in the limit of the length of a claim for the article 724 in accordance with Japanese civil law. in the legal characteristic. And we have observed that the plea that the responsibility for indemnification become extinct applies to the principle of food faith. if we see the period as the extinction prescription.
      Moreover, we presented the following grounds for the Japanese court to acknowledge its responsibility for illegal acts during the Japanese occupation: ⅰ) that we should deny the reason of the extinctive system’s existence and the Japanese application of extinctive prescription on the responsibility in the light of good faith in terms of the responsibility for illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation, which is the claims for the indemnification, ⅱ) that it is proper that Japan should acknowledge its responsibility from the perspective of the principle of international treaties and international laws in the illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation in the principle of international treaties and laws, ⅲ) that Japan should exclude the illegal acts of human rights crimes that occurred during the Japanese occupation from the domain of applying extinctive prescription, and ⅳ) that all issues will be clearly resolved if Japanese government and Japanese lawmakers apologize to victims nd their family by enacting the laws of the responsibility for the indemnification made during the Japanese occupation to execute the responsibility for indemnification for the illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation,
      In addition, for the indemnification for damages to Korean comfort women in the illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation, starting with Takarazuka city council’s approval of a written opinion request for solving the comfort women’s problems in March 2008, 20 city councils approved the written opinion till March 2010 and a campaign for the establishment of a legislative bill to promote solving the problems forced sexual harassment victims during war is being built up.
      But the parties of the victims have been advanced in age and died already evenwhile Japanese lawmakers are not taking any measure.
      Thus, it should be urgently urged to legislate the laws for quick indemnification and to let Japan apologize. The most resonable for Japanese government to solve the illegal acts that occurred during Japanese occupation is to pass a bill of acknowledging its responsibility of illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation and thus to take relief steps to put it into practice substantially.
      Lastly, the responsibility for illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation features the seriousness in that most of infringements on human rights were done by imperialism and to the individuals who could not be resistant. Given that these damages are not forgotten over time and the pain increases day by day if the relief steps are not taken, and that most of the victims have attained an advanced age, they will have few opportunity for a claim for the indemnification and thus the problems must be solved immediately.
      Therefore, the extinctive prescription system, presented as a ground to avoid the legal responsibility, will not see the reason for its justification and existence in the claim rights for indemnification for a violation of human rights and be required to make an direct apology as well as a plan for solving the problems in a legislative way.
      번역하기

      So far we have seen that when a Korean files the suit against Japan to the Japanese court in its responsibility for illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation, it is deemed to be the extinctive prescription in the limit of the length of...

      So far we have seen that when a Korean files the suit against Japan to the Japanese court in its responsibility for illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation, it is deemed to be the extinctive prescription in the limit of the length of a claim for the article 724 in accordance with Japanese civil law. in the legal characteristic. And we have observed that the plea that the responsibility for indemnification become extinct applies to the principle of food faith. if we see the period as the extinction prescription.
      Moreover, we presented the following grounds for the Japanese court to acknowledge its responsibility for illegal acts during the Japanese occupation: ⅰ) that we should deny the reason of the extinctive system’s existence and the Japanese application of extinctive prescription on the responsibility in the light of good faith in terms of the responsibility for illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation, which is the claims for the indemnification, ⅱ) that it is proper that Japan should acknowledge its responsibility from the perspective of the principle of international treaties and international laws in the illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation in the principle of international treaties and laws, ⅲ) that Japan should exclude the illegal acts of human rights crimes that occurred during the Japanese occupation from the domain of applying extinctive prescription, and ⅳ) that all issues will be clearly resolved if Japanese government and Japanese lawmakers apologize to victims nd their family by enacting the laws of the responsibility for the indemnification made during the Japanese occupation to execute the responsibility for indemnification for the illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation,
      In addition, for the indemnification for damages to Korean comfort women in the illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation, starting with Takarazuka city council’s approval of a written opinion request for solving the comfort women’s problems in March 2008, 20 city councils approved the written opinion till March 2010 and a campaign for the establishment of a legislative bill to promote solving the problems forced sexual harassment victims during war is being built up.
      But the parties of the victims have been advanced in age and died already evenwhile Japanese lawmakers are not taking any measure.
      Thus, it should be urgently urged to legislate the laws for quick indemnification and to let Japan apologize. The most resonable for Japanese government to solve the illegal acts that occurred during Japanese occupation is to pass a bill of acknowledging its responsibility of illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation and thus to take relief steps to put it into practice substantially.
      Lastly, the responsibility for illegal acts that occurred during the Japanese occupation features the seriousness in that most of infringements on human rights were done by imperialism and to the individuals who could not be resistant. Given that these damages are not forgotten over time and the pain increases day by day if the relief steps are not taken, and that most of the victims have attained an advanced age, they will have few opportunity for a claim for the indemnification and thus the problems must be solved immediately.
      Therefore, the extinctive prescription system, presented as a ground to avoid the legal responsibility, will not see the reason for its justification and existence in the claim rights for indemnification for a violation of human rights and be required to make an direct apology as well as a plan for solving the problems in a legislative way.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 國家 및 公企業의 不法行爲責任의 特殊性
      • Ⅲ. 不法行爲責任의 認定根據
      • Ⅳ. 不法行爲責任認定判例-대법원 2012.5.24.선고 2009다22549 판결과 대법원 2012.5.24. 선고 2009다68620 판결-
      • Ⅴ. 結論
      • Ⅰ. 序論
      • Ⅱ. 國家 및 公企業의 不法行爲責任의 特殊性
      • Ⅲ. 不法行爲責任의 認定根據
      • Ⅳ. 不法行爲責任認定判例-대법원 2012.5.24.선고 2009다22549 판결과 대법원 2012.5.24. 선고 2009다68620 판결-
      • Ⅴ. 結論
      • 〈참고문헌〉
      • 〈Abstract〉
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼