유전형과 재배환경의 상호작용에 따른 감자 수량성과 글리코알카로이드 함량 변화 = Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis for Potato Performance and Glycoalkaloid Content in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The potato tuber is known as a rich source of essential nutrients, used throughout the world. Although potatobreeding programs share some priorities, the major objective is to increase the genetic potential for yield through breeding or to eliminate hazards that reduce yield. Glycoalkaloids, which are considered a serious hazard to human health, accumulate naturally in potatoes during growth, harvesting, transportation, and storage. Here, we used the AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (Genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction) biplot model, to evaluate tuber yield stability and glycoalkaloid content in six potato cultivars across three locations during 2012/2013. The environment on tuber yield had the greatest effect and accounted for 33.0% of the total sum squares; genotypes accounted for 3.8% and G×E interaction accounted for 11.1% which is the nest highest contribution. Conversely, the genotype on glycoalkaloid had the greatest effect and accounted for 82.4% of the total sum squares), whereas environment and G×E effects on this trait accounted for only 0.4% and 3.7%, respectively. Furthermore, potato genotype ‘Superior’, which covers most of the cultivated area, exhibited high yield performance with stability. ‘Goun’, which showed lower glycoalkaloid content, was the most suitable and desirable genotype. Results showed that, while tuber yield was more affected by the environment, glycoalkaloid content was more dependent on genotype. Further, the use of the AMMI and GGE biplot model generated more interactive visuals, facilitated the identification of superior genotypes, and suggested decisions on a variety of recommendations for specific environments.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

감자 6품종인 수미(SP), 대서(AT), 하령(HR), 고운(GU), 홍영(HY), 자영(JY)을 대상으로, 해발고도별로 재배환경이다른 강릉(E1), 진부(E2), 대관령(E3) 지역에서 2012년과2013년 재배하여 괴경 수량성과 글리코알카로이드(PGA) 함량을 평가하였다. 품종이 가지고 있는 유전적 특성은 품종 고유의 유전형(G)과 재배환경(E)과의 상호작용(G×E)을거쳐 발현되므로 본 연구에서는 AMMI 모델과 GGE biplot 분석을 통해 지역별 수량성과 PGA 함량 변화 양상을 검토하였다.
1. 감자 수량은 재배환경과 상호작용이 차지하는 비율이높고, PGA 함량은 유전형(품종)의 효과가 차지하는비율이 높은 것으로 나타났다.
2. 지역별로 높은 수량을 나타내는데 적합한 품종으로 강릉에서 ‘수미’, 진부에서 ‘고운’, 대관령 에서 ‘하령’이었으며, 수량이 높으면서 생산 안정성을 보인 품종은수미였다.
3. 지역별로 높은 PGA 함량을 보이는 품종으로 강릉에서 ‘하령’, 진부에서 ‘대서’, 대관령에서 ‘수미’이었으며, PGA 함량이 낮으면서 재배환경에 영향을 덜 받는안정성이 뛰어난 품종은 ‘고운’이었다.
4. 감자 품종의 양적 농업 형질인 수량은 재배환경에 따라 차이를 보였으며, PGA 함량은 품종 고유의 형질차이에 의해 다르게 나타났다.
5. 감자의 수량성을 확보하기 위해서는 재배 적지의 선정이 중요하고, PGA 함량을 낮추기 위해서는 저함유 품종 개발이 선행되어야 한다고 판단되었다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김수정, "통합세척시스템 활용시 포장재 종류별 세척감자의 품질 특성" 한국식품과학회 48 (48): 247-255, 2016

2 박민우, "재배환경과 유전형의 상호작용에 따른 토마토 과실 품질 변화" 한국원예학회 35 (35): 361-372, 2017

3 최희돈, "국내산 신품종 감자의 영양성분 및 이화학적 특성" 한국식품과학회 40 (40): 382-388, 2008

4 김수정, "감자의 세척유무 및 저장온도에 따른 녹화 및 상품성 유지 기간 구명" 한국작물학회 62 (62): 66-72, 2017

5 김율호, "감자 주요 품종의 괴경 부위, 저장기간별 글리코알칼로이드(glycoalkaloid) 함량" 한국육종학회 46 (46): 209-217, 2014

6 Rural Development Administration, "The Potato:Guidance of agricultural technology-31"

7 FAO/WHO, "Summary of evaluations performed by the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives" ILSI Press 1999

8 Nam E. Y., "Study on statistical analysis techniques for genotype and environment interaction analysis" Rural Development Administration 262-276, 2004

9 Pourdad, S. S, "Study on seed yield stability of sunflower inbred lines through GGE biplot" 58 : 19-28, 2013

10 Park, M. W., "Study on effect of genotype and environment interaction on tomato fruit characteristics" Gyeongsang National Univ 2017

11 Gauch, H. G, "Statistical analysis of reginal yield trials:AMMI analysis of factorial designs" Elsevier 1992

12 Zobel, R. W., "Statistical analysis of a yield trial" 80 : 388-393, 1988

13 Rural Development Administration, "Standard farming text -The potato"

14 Sneller, C. H., "Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean" 37 : 383-390, 1997

15 Fehr, W. R., "Principal of cultivar development. Vol. 1Theory and technique" Macmillan Publishing Company 1987

16 Friedman, M, "Potato glycoalkaloids:Chemistry, analysis, safety and plant physiology" 16 : 55-132, 1997

17 Friedman, M., "Potato glycoalkaloids and metabolites:Role in the plant and in the diet" 54 : 8655-8681, 2006

18 Grunenfelder, L, "Physiological studies of light-induced greening in fresh market potatoes" Washington State University 2005

19 Purchase, J. L, "Parametric analysis to described G × E interaction and yield stability in winter yield" University of Orange Free State 1997

20 "National Climate Data Service System"

21 Gauch, H. G, "Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction" 44 : 705-715, 1988

22 Kroonenberg, P. M., "Introduction to biplots for GE tables" 51 : 1995

23 Vargas, M., "Interpreting treatment × environment interaction in agronomy trials" 93 : 949-960, 2001

24 심강보, "Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using GGE Biplot Analysis" 한국작물학회 60 (60): 349-354, 2015

25 Rincon, F., "Identifying subsets of maize accessions by three-mode principal component analysis" 37 : 1936-1943, 1997

26 Gauch, H. G, "Identifying megaenvironments and targeting genotypes" 37 : 311-326, 1997

27 Reza, M., "Identification of stability and adaptability in advanced durum genotypes using AMMI analysis" 6 : 1261-1268, 2007

28 Bejarano, L., "Glycoalkaloids in potato tubers: the effect of variety and drought stress on the α-solanine and α-chaconine contents of potatoes" 80 : 2096-2100, 2000

29 Grunenfelder, L. A., "Glycoalkaloid development during greening of fresh market potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.)" 54 : 5847-5854, 2006

30 Sanford, L. L., "Glycoalkaloid content in tubers of hybrid and backcross populations from a Solanum tuberosum (×) chacoense cross" 72 : 261-271, 1995

31 Yang, C. I, "Genotype × environment interaction of rice yield in multi-location trials" 46 : 453-458, 2001

32 Dia, M, "Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis for watermelon fruit yield in the United States" 56 : 1645-1661, 2016

33 Tolessa, T. T., "Genotype × environment interaction and performance stability for grain yield in field pea (Pisum sativum L.)genotypes" 117-123, 2013

34 Yan, W, "Genotype by environment interaction and crop yield" 16 : 135-178, 1998

35 Morris, S. C, "Genetic and environmental effects of levels of glycoalkaloids in cultivars of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)" 18 : 271-282, 1985

36 Yan, W., "GGE biplot : a window application for graphical analysis of multi-environmental data and other types of twoway data" 93 : 1111-1118, 2001

37 Yan, W., "GGE Biplot vs. AMMI analysis of genotype-byenvironment data" 47 : 641-653, 2007

38 Ezatolla, F., "GGE Biplot analysis of genotypes × envrionemnt interaction in chick pea genoypes" 3 : 417-423, 2013

39 "Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics"

40 Roselló, S., "Evaluation of the genotype, environment and their interaction on carotenoid and ascorbic acid accumulation in tomato germplasm" 91 : 1014-1021, 2010

41 Machado, R. M. D, "Effect of light and temperature on the formation of glycoalkaloids in potato tubers" 18 : 503-508, 2007

42 Yan, W, "Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on GGE biplot" 40 : 597-605, 2000

43 Navabi, A., "Can spring wheat growing mega-environments in the northern great plain be dissected for representative locations or niche-adapted genotypes?" 46 : 1107-1116, 2006

44 Yan, W, "Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario" 42 : 11-20, 2002

45 Yan, W., "Biplot analysis of multienvironment trial data: principles and application" 86 : 623-645, 2006

46 Piepho, H. P, "Analyzing genotype-environment data by mixed models with multiplicative effects" 53 : 761-766, 1997

47 Fufa, M, "AMMI analysis of tuber yield of potato genotypes grown in bale, southeastern Ethiopia" 1 : 120-, 2013

48 Kim, S. J, "A Gift from God: Cooking with potatoes" Rural Development Administration 69-, 2016