RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘2007年 改正 敎育 課程’에 따른 漢文 敎科書 『檢定 基準』과 『編纂上의 留意點』의 特徵과 問題點 = Characteristics And Problems of Authorizing Chinese Literature Textbooks, Based on a New Revised Curriculum in 2007.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104009862

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A new revised curriculum in 2007 has been applied to the educational situation by textbooks. However, in Korea, when the textbooks are published, they are based on 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', not on curriculum.
      This thesis is focused on revealing the problems of the current authorizing system by analyzing the 'common standards' and 'standards by subjects', which are presented in 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' which are used in both the 7th national curriculum and the new revised curriculum in 2007.
      First, standards which are applied to both curriculums are almost same. As a result, 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' don't play an effective role in publishing helpful textbooks. This shows that, rather than 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', 'the guide for curriculum' should be a standard for authorizing textbooks.
      Also, the current standards for authorizing textbooks force the publishing companies not to change the physical factors of textbooks, such as size, color, paper quality, which makes students lose interest in textbooks.
      Consequently, it is required that the current official approval system be abolished and the new system for publishing textbooks, that is free publishing system, be introduced.
      번역하기

      A new revised curriculum in 2007 has been applied to the educational situation by textbooks. However, in Korea, when the textbooks are published, they are based on 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', not on curricu...

      A new revised curriculum in 2007 has been applied to the educational situation by textbooks. However, in Korea, when the textbooks are published, they are based on 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', not on curriculum.
      This thesis is focused on revealing the problems of the current authorizing system by analyzing the 'common standards' and 'standards by subjects', which are presented in 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' which are used in both the 7th national curriculum and the new revised curriculum in 2007.
      First, standards which are applied to both curriculums are almost same. As a result, 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' don't play an effective role in publishing helpful textbooks. This shows that, rather than 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', 'the guide for curriculum' should be a standard for authorizing textbooks.
      Also, the current standards for authorizing textbooks force the publishing companies not to change the physical factors of textbooks, such as size, color, paper quality, which makes students lose interest in textbooks.
      Consequently, it is required that the current official approval system be abolished and the new system for publishing textbooks, that is free publishing system, be introduced.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A new revised curriculum in 2007 has been applied to the educational situation by textbooks. However, in Korea, when the textbooks are published, they are based on 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', not on curriculum.
      This thesis is focused on revealing the problems of the current authorizing system by analyzing the 'common standards' and 'standards by subjects', which are presented in 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' which are used in both the 7th national curriculum and the new revised curriculum in 2007.
      First, standards which are applied to both curriculums are almost same. As a result, 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' don't play an effective role in publishing helpful textbooks. This shows that, rather than 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', 'the guide for curriculum' should be a standard for authorizing textbooks.
      Also, the current standards for authorizing textbooks force the publishing companies not to change the physical factors of textbooks, such as size, color, paper quality, which makes students lose interest in textbooks.
      Consequently, it is required that the current official approval system be abolished and the new system for publishing textbooks, that is free publishing system, be introduced.
      번역하기

      A new revised curriculum in 2007 has been applied to the educational situation by textbooks. However, in Korea, when the textbooks are published, they are based on 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', not on curricu...

      A new revised curriculum in 2007 has been applied to the educational situation by textbooks. However, in Korea, when the textbooks are published, they are based on 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', not on curriculum.
      This thesis is focused on revealing the problems of the current authorizing system by analyzing the 'common standards' and 'standards by subjects', which are presented in 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' which are used in both the 7th national curriculum and the new revised curriculum in 2007.
      First, standards which are applied to both curriculums are almost same. As a result, 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks' don't play an effective role in publishing helpful textbooks. This shows that, rather than 'standards for authorizing' and 'instructions for publishing textbooks', 'the guide for curriculum' should be a standard for authorizing textbooks.
      Also, the current standards for authorizing textbooks force the publishing companies not to change the physical factors of textbooks, such as size, color, paper quality, which makes students lose interest in textbooks.
      Consequently, it is required that the current official approval system be abolished and the new system for publishing textbooks, that is free publishing system, be introduced.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한국 검정 교과서,

      2 법률지식정보시스템,

      3 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅴ) 외국어(영어), 재량활동, 한문, 컴퓨터, 환경, 생활 외국어" 2000

      4 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅴ) 외국어(영어), 재량 활동, 한문, 정보, 환경, 생활 외국어" 2007

      5 교육부, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 2종도서 검정기준" 1999

      6 한국교육과정평가원, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 교과용 도서 검정 체제 연구" 2002

      7 교육부, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 2종 교과용 도서 집필상의 유의점" 1999

      8 홍후조, "검정도서 발행에 관한 연구" 한국검정교과서 2007

      9 교육부, "2007년 개정 교육과정(교육인적자원부 고시 제2007-79호)에 따른 중학교 검정도서 편찬상의 유의점" 2007

      10 교육부, "2007년 개정 교육과정(교육인적자원부 고시 제2007-79호)에 따른 중학교 검정도서 검정기준" 2007

      1 한국 검정 교과서,

      2 법률지식정보시스템,

      3 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅴ) 외국어(영어), 재량활동, 한문, 컴퓨터, 환경, 생활 외국어" 2000

      4 교육부, "중학교 교육과정 해설(Ⅴ) 외국어(영어), 재량 활동, 한문, 정보, 환경, 생활 외국어" 2007

      5 교육부, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 2종도서 검정기준" 1999

      6 한국교육과정평가원, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 교과용 도서 검정 체제 연구" 2002

      7 교육부, "제7차 교육과정에 따른 2종 교과용 도서 집필상의 유의점" 1999

      8 홍후조, "검정도서 발행에 관한 연구" 한국검정교과서 2007

      9 교육부, "2007년 개정 교육과정(교육인적자원부 고시 제2007-79호)에 따른 중학교 검정도서 편찬상의 유의점" 2007

      10 교육부, "2007년 개정 교육과정(교육인적자원부 고시 제2007-79호)에 따른 중학교 검정도서 검정기준" 2007

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.36 0.36 0.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.36 0.746 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼