RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고독과 신성의 변증 -김현승 론- = Demonstration of solitude and divinity

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99865168

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The poet world of Kim Hyun-Seung is based on Christian world view. So poetic creation of him has imitative characteristics on God`s creativity. The creativity in Christianity is only for God`s privilege. However, God exists not only as transcendental absoluteness but is internal nature to him. It is because that the transcendental absolute is also “your eyes are my mind(「Fall is snowy season」).” So his poet and religion have close continuity. Human immanence establishing poetic foundation and external transcendence of religion are conflated. It seems that backgrounds is here that the religious poet of Kim Hyun-Seung is not far from the material principal of the Bible and odic fanaticism literature category, and keeps emotional density and tensible force. Meanwhile, human immanence and continuity of transcendence of God are revealed in the research on existence of God without discrimination. Existence of God which presides all things in the universe, through empty silence such as “empty crucible(「To Farewell」)” has something in common with enlightenment of doing nothing composing creeds of oriental vision of the universe. Therefore his way toward God is also the process to seek the truth toward self realization. He faces “eternity(「Extreme loneliness」)” in the summit of loneliness searching for self nature. But he does not experience saint of Christian one God. “Eternity” which he faces is understood as ontological root in general. This point reveals that his poet is “not a decisively Christian thing even though his poetic starts from Christian reason.” At this time, he felt doubt on religion. What answers to his methodical doubt spreading out his intelligent logic is the experience of disease which is a fatal coincidence. He leans toward the way of “absolute faith” again. At this moment, his ultra-extreme methodology toward deficiency of limited existence concludes rescue through the absolute. External transcendence overwhelms human immanence. At his point, continuity of poet and religion are divided in his life. At his time, his religious poet mainly stands out the tendency of fanaticism.
      번역하기

      The poet world of Kim Hyun-Seung is based on Christian world view. So poetic creation of him has imitative characteristics on God`s creativity. The creativity in Christianity is only for God`s privilege. However, God exists not only as transcendental ...

      The poet world of Kim Hyun-Seung is based on Christian world view. So poetic creation of him has imitative characteristics on God`s creativity. The creativity in Christianity is only for God`s privilege. However, God exists not only as transcendental absoluteness but is internal nature to him. It is because that the transcendental absolute is also “your eyes are my mind(「Fall is snowy season」).” So his poet and religion have close continuity. Human immanence establishing poetic foundation and external transcendence of religion are conflated. It seems that backgrounds is here that the religious poet of Kim Hyun-Seung is not far from the material principal of the Bible and odic fanaticism literature category, and keeps emotional density and tensible force. Meanwhile, human immanence and continuity of transcendence of God are revealed in the research on existence of God without discrimination. Existence of God which presides all things in the universe, through empty silence such as “empty crucible(「To Farewell」)” has something in common with enlightenment of doing nothing composing creeds of oriental vision of the universe. Therefore his way toward God is also the process to seek the truth toward self realization. He faces “eternity(「Extreme loneliness」)” in the summit of loneliness searching for self nature. But he does not experience saint of Christian one God. “Eternity” which he faces is understood as ontological root in general. This point reveals that his poet is “not a decisively Christian thing even though his poetic starts from Christian reason.” At this time, he felt doubt on religion. What answers to his methodical doubt spreading out his intelligent logic is the experience of disease which is a fatal coincidence. He leans toward the way of “absolute faith” again. At this moment, his ultra-extreme methodology toward deficiency of limited existence concludes rescue through the absolute. External transcendence overwhelms human immanence. At his point, continuity of poet and religion are divided in his life. At his time, his religious poet mainly stands out the tendency of fanaticism.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 윤이흠, "한국인의 종교관" 서울대학교출판부 2007

      2 칼 뢰비트, "지식과 신앙, 그리고 회의" 다산글방 2007

      3 김윤식, "신앙과 고독의 분리문제, In 한국현대시론비판" 일지사 1976

      4 "무위당 장일순의 노자 읽기" 삼인 2003

      5 "마가복음, 9장 24절"

      6 박철호, "데카르트 방법서설" 김영사 2008

      7 김인섭, "김현승시전집" 민음사 2005

      8 권오만, "김현승과 성ㆍ속의 갈등,, In 한국현대시사연구" 일지사 1983

      9 문덕수, "김현승 시 연구" 1 (1): 1984

      10 C.S 루이스, "기독교적 숙고" 홍성사 2013

      1 윤이흠, "한국인의 종교관" 서울대학교출판부 2007

      2 칼 뢰비트, "지식과 신앙, 그리고 회의" 다산글방 2007

      3 김윤식, "신앙과 고독의 분리문제, In 한국현대시론비판" 일지사 1976

      4 "무위당 장일순의 노자 읽기" 삼인 2003

      5 "마가복음, 9장 24절"

      6 박철호, "데카르트 방법서설" 김영사 2008

      7 김인섭, "김현승시전집" 민음사 2005

      8 권오만, "김현승과 성ㆍ속의 갈등,, In 한국현대시사연구" 일지사 1983

      9 문덕수, "김현승 시 연구" 1 (1): 1984

      10 C.S 루이스, "기독교적 숙고" 홍성사 2013

      11 "고린도전서, 3:1617"

      12 "고린더후서, 3:18"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-02-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Learned Society of the Korean Culture -> The Association for Korean Cultural Studies KCI등재
      2010-02-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : THE Korean Culture Journal -> The Review of Korean Cultural Studies KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-07-02 학술지명변경 외국어명 : A study of Han Min Jok's culture -> THE Korean Culture Journal KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-06-16 학회명변경 영문명 : The Learned Society Of Han-Min-Jok'S Culture -> The Learned Society of the Korean Culture KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.57
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.59 0.59 1.042 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼