RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      현대적 친권 개념에 대한 검토 -이혼 시의 친권을 중심으로- = A Review of the Modern Concept of Parental Authority -Focusing on Parental Authority in Divorce-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109434054

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Article 909 (4) of the Korean Civil Code stipulates, “If parents divorce, parents must determine a person with parental authority by consultation. If agreement cannot be reached or no agreement is reached, the family court shall designate a person with parental authority ex officio or at the request of the parties.” In the case of a divorce by agreement, it is stipulated that parents can decide parental authority. This ultimately applies to divorce by trial.
      In modern society, the other name for parenting responsibilities and parenting obligations for parents’ children is parental authority. From the ancient Roman era, when this parental authority was called father’s rights, to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1989, not only the name but also its meaning has changed completely. Parental authority now has greater weight on the parents’ duty to protect the welfare of their children rather than on the parents’ right to their children.
      Despite this modern concept of parental authority, the Korean Civil Code, since its revision in 1990, still stipulates that divorcing parents can determine the person with parental authority through agreement. Articles 909 (4) and (5) of the Korean Civil Code do not fit with the modern concept of parental authority, do not faithfully fulfill obligations as a ratifying country of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and have the problem that parents who only have custody actually exercise parental rights.
      France and Germany are already discussing the issue of joint custody beyond discussing joint parental authority. We must also revise the Civil Code to apply the principle of joint parental authority to divorced parents as well as to married parents.
      번역하기

      Article 909 (4) of the Korean Civil Code stipulates, “If parents divorce, parents must determine a person with parental authority by consultation. If agreement cannot be reached or no agreement is reached, the family court shall designate a person w...

      Article 909 (4) of the Korean Civil Code stipulates, “If parents divorce, parents must determine a person with parental authority by consultation. If agreement cannot be reached or no agreement is reached, the family court shall designate a person with parental authority ex officio or at the request of the parties.” In the case of a divorce by agreement, it is stipulated that parents can decide parental authority. This ultimately applies to divorce by trial.
      In modern society, the other name for parenting responsibilities and parenting obligations for parents’ children is parental authority. From the ancient Roman era, when this parental authority was called father’s rights, to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in 1989, not only the name but also its meaning has changed completely. Parental authority now has greater weight on the parents’ duty to protect the welfare of their children rather than on the parents’ right to their children.
      Despite this modern concept of parental authority, the Korean Civil Code, since its revision in 1990, still stipulates that divorcing parents can determine the person with parental authority through agreement. Articles 909 (4) and (5) of the Korean Civil Code do not fit with the modern concept of parental authority, do not faithfully fulfill obligations as a ratifying country of the Convention on the Rights of the Child, and have the problem that parents who only have custody actually exercise parental rights.
      France and Germany are already discussing the issue of joint custody beyond discussing joint parental authority. We must also revise the Civil Code to apply the principle of joint parental authority to divorced parents as well as to married parents.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼