본 연구는 민족주의가 ‘학문적 이해’의 단계에서 대중들의 자기 이해의 과정으로 전환되고 표출되는 양상을 논의하려는 목적을 지니고 있다. 즉, 학문적 이해의 단계에서 민족적 선...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82586423
2011
-
920
KCI등재
학술저널
379-407(29쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
본 연구는 민족주의가 ‘학문적 이해’의 단계에서 대중들의 자기 이해의 과정으로 전환되고 표출되는 양상을 논의하려는 목적을 지니고 있다. 즉, 학문적 이해의 단계에서 민족적 선...
본 연구는 민족주의가 ‘학문적 이해’의 단계에서 대중들의 자기 이해의 과정으로 전환되고 표출되는 양상을 논의하려는 목적을 지니고 있다. 즉, 학문적 이해의 단계에서 민족적 선동과 대중운동으로 전환된 원인과 과정을 파악함으로써 체코인과 슬로바키아인들의 자기 이해가 형성되고 표출되는 양상을 분석하려는 것이다.
또한 본 연구에서는 체코슬로바키즘(Czechoslovakism)이라고 하는 단일민족 사상이 생겨나게 된 배경과 그러한 단일민족 사상이 실패한 원인을 두 민족의 자기 이해의 측면에서 살펴본다. 이런 두 가지 측면은 결국 합스부르크라는 거대한 제국 내에서의 자기 이해와 국가독립 이후의 자기 이해의 과정을 분석함으로써 체코와 슬로바키아가 현재 두 개의 독립국가로 분리된 원인을 찾으려는 시도이기도 하다. 결론에서는 체코슬로바키즘이 1차대전 이후 국가 건국에 필요했던 이데올로기이자 전략적 선택이었다고 주장하며 두 민족 간 상이한 민족의식과 자기 이해로 인해 이러한 단일민족 사상이 실패했음을 밝힌다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The purpose of this study is to discuss the transitional processes and aspects of national self-understanding among czechs and slovaks from 19th to early 20th century. In other words, examining the causes of transition from the national agitations and...
The purpose of this study is to discuss the transitional processes and aspects of national self-understanding among czechs and slovaks from 19th to early 20th century. In other words, examining the causes of transition from the national agitations and national movements to popular movements, this paper is to discuss the process and aspects of establishment of the self-understanding of czechs and slovaks.
In addition in this paper the background of formation of Czechoslovakism and the causes of unsuccessful consequence are discussed by means of self-understandings of two nations. Czechoslovakism is a term for the political and cultural conception of a unified Czechoslovak nation. The then President of Czechoslovakia T. G. Masaryk made this term as for the state-forming ideology and took it for warrant of national majority over Germans in newly established state. But not all Czechoslovsks agreed with this conception. Especially slovak national leaders didn't accept it. They insisted Czech and Slovak are not same nation and Slovak is a independent nation as Czech. The ideology of a unified nation was renounced after 1960 Constitution and federalization in 1969 and finally break-up of Czechoslovakia in 1993. In this paper I suggest the different national identity and self-understanding of two nations are the causes of the failure of a unified national ideology. And the different identity and self-understanding of
czechs and slovaks were originated from the period of national awakening under the Habsburg empire. From that time two nations have been developing their national identity and self-understanding differently. Since the ideology of Czechoslovakism was just invented to rationalize the establishment of Czechoslovak state after the First World War, it was to be failed after two nations had realized it was not their real national aspiration.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김신규, "체코-독일: 갈등과 공존의 역사" 5 : 17-38, 2003
2 앤더슨, B, "민족주의의 기원과 전파" 나남 1993
3 "Československá vlastivěda, Díl II" 362-364, 1969
4 Národní archiv, "Z. 6962/22, Nejvišší správní soud"
5 Hroch,Miroslav, "Why did they win? Preconditions for successful national agitation" 34 : 645-655, 2004
6 Smith,A.D, "The ethnic origin of nations" Blackwell 1988
7 Drabek,Anna, "The concept of 'nation' in Bohemia and Moravia at the turn of the 19th century" 15 (15): 305-311, 1992
8 Brock,Peter, "The Slovak national awakening" Univ. of Toronto Press 1976
9 Masaryk.T.G, "The New Europe: The Slav Standpoint" Bucknell Univ. Press 1972
10 Zahra,Tara, "The Minority Problem and National Classification in the French and Czechoslovakia Borderlands" 17 (17): 137-165, 2008
1 김신규, "체코-독일: 갈등과 공존의 역사" 5 : 17-38, 2003
2 앤더슨, B, "민족주의의 기원과 전파" 나남 1993
3 "Československá vlastivěda, Díl II" 362-364, 1969
4 Národní archiv, "Z. 6962/22, Nejvišší správní soud"
5 Hroch,Miroslav, "Why did they win? Preconditions for successful national agitation" 34 : 645-655, 2004
6 Smith,A.D, "The ethnic origin of nations" Blackwell 1988
7 Drabek,Anna, "The concept of 'nation' in Bohemia and Moravia at the turn of the 19th century" 15 (15): 305-311, 1992
8 Brock,Peter, "The Slovak national awakening" Univ. of Toronto Press 1976
9 Masaryk.T.G, "The New Europe: The Slav Standpoint" Bucknell Univ. Press 1972
10 Zahra,Tara, "The Minority Problem and National Classification in the French and Czechoslovakia Borderlands" 17 (17): 137-165, 2008
11 Kimball,Stanley B, "The Matice česká, 1831-1861" Univ. of Toronto Press 53-73, 1970
12 Bakke,Elisabeth, "The Making of Czechoslovakism in the First Czechoslovak Republic" R. Oldenbourg Verlag 1-23, 2004
13 Vermes, Gabor, "The Liberal Vision and Conservative Statecraft of a Magyar Nationalist" Columbia Univ. Press 1985
14 Wank,Solomon, "The Growth of Nationalism in the Habsburg Monarchy 1848-1918" 10 : 165-179, 1983
15 Anderle,Josef, "The First Republic, 1918-1938" Columbia Univ Press 89-112, 1979
16 Seton-Watson,H, "The European Revolution" Praeger 1951
17 Sked,Alan, "The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire,1815-1918" Longman 1989
18 Leff,Carol Skalnik, "The Czech and Slovak Republics: Nation Versus State" Westview 1997
19 Mamatej,Victor S, "The Battle of the White Mountains as Myth in Czech History" 15 (15): 1981
20 Pešek,Thomas G, "The "Czechoslovak" question on the eve of the 1848 revolution in The Czech Renascence of the Nineteenth Century" Univ. of Toronto Press 130-145, 1970
21 Hroch,Miroslav, "Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe: a Comparative Analysis of the Social Composition of Patriotic Groups among the Smaller European Nations" Cambridge Univ. Press 1985
22 Mikus, Joseph A, "Slovakia: A Political History: 1918-1950" Marquette Univ. Press 1950
23 "Sbírka zákonů a nařízení statu československého"
24 Corrigan, Patricia Anne Richards, "Political disintegration of Czechoslovakia" Simon Fraser Univ 1997
25 Morava,Jiří, "Palacký" Vyšehrad 1998
26 Bartoš, J, "Osobnosti českých dějin" Fragment 1995
27 Štvrtecký,Štefan, "Náš Milan Rastislav Štefánik" snema 1990
28 Cohen,Gary B, "Nationalist Politics and the Dynamics of State and Civil Society in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1867–1914" 40 : 241-278, 2007
29 Seton-Watson,R.W, "Masaryk in England" Macmillian Company 1943
30 Kamusella,Tomasz D.I, "Language as an instrument of nationalism in Central Europe" 7 (7): 235-251, 2001
31 Rusinow,Dennison, "Ethnic Politics in the Habsburg Monarchy and Successor States: Three Answers to the National Question" St Martin's Press 243-267, 1992
32 Bakke, Elisabeth, "Doomed to failure? The Czechoslovak nation project and the Slovak autonomist reaction 1918-1938" University of Oslo 1938
33 Woodward, E. L, "Documents on British Foreign Policy" 1947
34 Seiler, Danielle, "Czechoslovakia: A State of Perceived Bias" Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 1998
35 Novotna,Teresa, "Czechoslovakia, Czechoslovakismus, and German National Minorities between the World Wars: Emanuel Radl’s Theory of a Nation and a State" 6 (6): 1-15, 2005
36 Thomson,S.Harrison, "Czechoslovakia in European History" Princeton Univ. Press 1953
37 Kubiš, Karel, "Czech Republic: National Formation" Representations of Europe and the Nation in Current and Prospective Member-States 1-30, 2002
38 Deák, István, "Beyond Nationalism: A Social and Political History of the Habsburg Officer Corps, 1848-1918" Oxford Univ. Press 1918
39 Pynsent,Robert B, "As Questions of Identity: Czech and Slovak Ideas of Nationality and Identity" CEU Press 2004
40 Skilling, H. Gordon, "Against the current 1882-1914" Pennsylvania State Univ. Press 1914
41 Kirschbaum,Stanislav J, "A History of Slovakia: The Struggle for Survival" St. Martin’s Griffin 1995
The Role of Anglicisms in Czech Specialised Discourse
1900년 전후 한국(인)과 폴란드·헝가리(인)의 상대 인식
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (기타) | |
2013-01-01 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 동유럽연구 -> 동유럽발칸연구 | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.17 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.16 | 0.15 | 0.459 | 0.05 |