RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    소경으로 태어나 다시 보는 사람(요한복음 9)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100576904

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper explores the theme of congenital blindness and recovery of eyesight in John 9 from the perspectives of ancient Judaism and Platonism and their definitions of blindness and seers. The two primary methodologies are the history of ideas suggested by Arthur Lovejoy and some intertextuality theories developed by Stephen Hinds, Richard Hays, and Dennis R. MacDonald. In the Jewish tradition, blindness has several meanings; both physical and psychical. Sometimes, blind people signify sinners who do not obey the voice or word of God (Deut 28:15, 29; Zep 1:17). The servants of the Lord and captive people of Israel are also blind (Isa 42:19; 43:8; 59:10). God Him/Herself, however, will open the eyes of the blind in the messianic era (Psalm 146:8; Isa 29:18; 35:5; 42:7, 18; 61:1). The man born blind who looks up again also parallels Plato' s concept of human being who is congenitally blind, but is able to perceive up again the intelligible world through the recollections of prenatal memory, although the doctrine of the immortality of the human soul is absent from the Fourth Gospel. The works of Philo of Alexandria and of Flavius Josphus attest to the prevalence of Platonism in first century Judaism. Fabius Quintilian who was a Roman rhetorician and contemporary of Josephus equates Plato with Homer and also Homer with Jupiter. This paper is innovative because it discusses some of the similarities and differences between the Johannine concept of human being in John 9 and the visual definition of human being in Plato, which are insufficiently discussed in the previous studies on the Fourth Gospel.
    번역하기

    This paper explores the theme of congenital blindness and recovery of eyesight in John 9 from the perspectives of ancient Judaism and Platonism and their definitions of blindness and seers. The two primary methodologies are the history of ideas sugges...

    This paper explores the theme of congenital blindness and recovery of eyesight in John 9 from the perspectives of ancient Judaism and Platonism and their definitions of blindness and seers. The two primary methodologies are the history of ideas suggested by Arthur Lovejoy and some intertextuality theories developed by Stephen Hinds, Richard Hays, and Dennis R. MacDonald. In the Jewish tradition, blindness has several meanings; both physical and psychical. Sometimes, blind people signify sinners who do not obey the voice or word of God (Deut 28:15, 29; Zep 1:17). The servants of the Lord and captive people of Israel are also blind (Isa 42:19; 43:8; 59:10). God Him/Herself, however, will open the eyes of the blind in the messianic era (Psalm 146:8; Isa 29:18; 35:5; 42:7, 18; 61:1). The man born blind who looks up again also parallels Plato' s concept of human being who is congenitally blind, but is able to perceive up again the intelligible world through the recollections of prenatal memory, although the doctrine of the immortality of the human soul is absent from the Fourth Gospel. The works of Philo of Alexandria and of Flavius Josphus attest to the prevalence of Platonism in first century Judaism. Fabius Quintilian who was a Roman rhetorician and contemporary of Josephus equates Plato with Homer and also Homer with Jupiter. This paper is innovative because it discusses some of the similarities and differences between the Johannine concept of human being in John 9 and the visual definition of human being in Plato, which are insufficiently discussed in the previous studies on the Fourth Gospel.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김득중, "요한의 신학" 컨콜디아사 151-207, 1994

    2 루돌프 불트만, "요한복음서 연구" 성광문화사 1979

    3 문우일, "상호 텍스트성에서 미메시스 비평까지" 한국신약학회 19 (19): 313-351, 2012

    4 문우일, "내 어머니의 집으로 ― 가나 혼인 잔치와 아가서의 상호텍스트성" 기독교신학연구소 (40) : 211-250, 2012

    5 플라톤, "국가·정체" 서광사 1997

    6 Sandra M. Schneiders, "Word, Theology, and Community in John" Chalice Press 189-209, 2002

    7 Plato, "Timaeus"

    8 Ernst Käsemann, "The Testament of Jesus: A Study of the Gospel of John in the Light of Chapter 17" Fortress Press 1968

    9 Gian Biagio Conte, "The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets" Cornell University Press 1986

    10 Wayne A. Meeks, "The Man from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism" 91 : 44-72, 1972

    1 김득중, "요한의 신학" 컨콜디아사 151-207, 1994

    2 루돌프 불트만, "요한복음서 연구" 성광문화사 1979

    3 문우일, "상호 텍스트성에서 미메시스 비평까지" 한국신약학회 19 (19): 313-351, 2012

    4 문우일, "내 어머니의 집으로 ― 가나 혼인 잔치와 아가서의 상호텍스트성" 기독교신학연구소 (40) : 211-250, 2012

    5 플라톤, "국가·정체" 서광사 1997

    6 Sandra M. Schneiders, "Word, Theology, and Community in John" Chalice Press 189-209, 2002

    7 Plato, "Timaeus"

    8 Ernst Käsemann, "The Testament of Jesus: A Study of the Gospel of John in the Light of Chapter 17" Fortress Press 1968

    9 Gian Biagio Conte, "The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets" Cornell University Press 1986

    10 Wayne A. Meeks, "The Man from Heaven in Johannine Sectarianism" 91 : 44-72, 1972

    11 Marcus Tullus Cicero, "The Laws, 1,30"

    12 Severino Pancaro, "The Law in the Fourth Gospel" Brill 1975

    13 Charles H. Dodd, "The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel" University Press 21-22, 1965

    14 C.H. Dodd, "The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel" University Press 1965

    15 Robert Renehan, "The Greek Anthropocentric View of Man" 85 : 239-259, 1981

    16 Arthur O. Lovejoy, "The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea" Harvard University Press; Oxford University Press 1936

    17 Rudolf Bultmann, "The Gospel of John: A Commentary" The Westminster Press 1971

    18 Raymond E. Brown, "The Gospel according to John I-XII" Doubleday & Company 1966

    19 Charles K. Barrett, "The Gospel according to John" S.P.C.K 1967

    20 Raymond E. Brwon, "The Gospel according to John" Doubleday 138-139, 1970

    21 C. K. Barrett, "The Gospel According to ST. John: An Introduction with Commentary and Notes on the Greek Text" The Westminster Press 356-, 1978

    22 K.L. Carroll, "The Fourth Gospel and the Exclusion of Christians from the Synagogue" 40 : 19-32, 1957

    23 Robert T. Fortna, "The Fourth Gospel and its Predecessor: From Narrative Source to Present Gospel" T&T Clark 1988

    24 Raymond E. Brown, "The Community of the Beloved Disciple: The Life, Loves and Hates of an Individual Church in New Testament Times" Paulist Press 1979

    25 Plato, "Republic 7"

    26 David Sedley, "Plato’s Cratylus" University Press 37-, 2003

    27 "Phaedrus"

    28 John Bogart, "Orthodox and Heretical Perfectionism in the Johannine Community as Evident in the First Epistle of John" Scholars 1977

    29 "NHC II.2"

    30 Dennis R. MacDonald, "Mimesis and Intertextuality in Antiquity and Christianity" Trinity Press International 2001

    31 John Painter, "John 9 and the Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel" 28 : 1986

    32 Jo-Ann A. Brant, "John" Baker Academic 209-, 2011

    33 Kåre Sigvald Fuglseth, "Johannine Sectarianism in Perspective: A Sociological, Historical, and Comparative Analysis of Temple and Social Relationships in the Gospel of John, Philo, and Qumran" Brill 2005

    34 D. Moody Smith, "Johannine Christianity: Some Reflections on its Character and Delineation" 21 : 222-248, 1941

    35 Steven T. Katz, "Issues in the Separation of Judaism and Christianity after 70 C.E.: A Reconsideration" 103 : 43-76, 1984

    36 Quintilian, "Institutio Oratoria, 10.1.81"

    37 J. Louis Martyn, "History and Theology in the Fourth Gospel" Westminster John Knox Press 2003

    38 Richard Hays, "Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul" Yale University Press 29-32, 1989

    39 Rudolf Bultmann, "Die Geschichte der synoptischen Tradition" Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1921

    40 Oscar Cullman, "Der johanneische Kreis, Sein Platz im Spätjudentum, in der Jügnerschaft Jesu und im Urchristentum" Mohr Siebeck 1975

    41 Aristotle, "De Partibus Animalium 4.10.18"

    42 Rudolf Bultmann, "Das Evangelium des Johannes" Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1968

    43 Plato, "Cratylus, 399C"

    44 R. Alan Culpepper, "Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel: A Study in Literary Design" Fortress Press 1983

    45 Stephen Hinds, "Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry: Roman Literature and Its Contexts" Cambridge University Press 1998

    46 Philp L. Tite, "A Community in Conflict: A Literary and Historial Reading of John 9" 15 (15): 77-100, 1997

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-06-19 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Evangelical Society of New Testament Studies KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.48 0.48 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.33 0.27 0.729 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼