RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      스웨덴과 핀란드의 취학연령 하향화 대응사례 분석 = A case study on the response to lowering of the school age in Sweden and Finland

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108372321

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to find implications for Korea by analyzing the response cases to the lowering of the school age in Sweden and Finland, in respect to the recent announcement of a plan to lower the school entrance age to 5, which caused a ...

      The purpose of this study is to find implications for Korea by analyzing the response cases to the lowering of the school age in Sweden and Finland, in respect to the recent announcement of a plan to lower the school entrance age to 5, which caused a social confusion in Korea. For this purpose, data were analyzed using literature research methods based on data from government agencies in Sweden and Finland, OECD and EU, and related studies. As a result of the study, the Nordic countries of Sweden and Finland showed child-centeredness of democracy, equality, freedom and liberation, solidarity and happiness through cooperation and compromise, and a good life for all children as prominent characteristics. These were reflected in early childhood education policy. Second, Sweden and Finland established the preschool class system, a pre-primay and compulsory education system for 6-year-old children. The preschool class was characterized by the preschoolification, and not schoolification. Third, the introduction of preschool class reduced the annual cost of investment per child, and the investment in early childhood education rendered positive results of expanding public investment in early childhood education. However, in terms of 6-year-old children, there was a clear difference between the infant class and ECEC. Therefore, care must be taken about the introduction of preschool class. Based on these results, the implications for the lowering of elementary school education to the age of 5 in Korea were discussed.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼