RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      고등학교 생물 교과서와 대학수학능력시험 생물 문항의 과학적 소양 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12343149

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The main purposes of the study were to investigate the nature and extent of scientific literacy categories coverage in high school biology textbooks and scholastic achievement test items of biology subject matter, and to find out whether or not these two high school biology curriculum materials have the potential to prepare scientifically literate citizens.
      In this study 5 kinds of high school biology textbooks and 240 scholastic achievement test items between 2005 and 2010 academic years were analyzed into 4 categories of scientific literacy. The 4 categories are : (a) science as a body of knowledge, (b) science as a way of investigation, (c) science as a way of thinking, (d) the interaction of science, technology, and society.
      Overall, textbooks most emphasized science as a body of knowledge, followed by science as a way of investigation. Whereas science as a way of thinking, and the interaction of science, technology, and society were neglected in the textbooks. BiologyⅠ or Ⅱ textbooks showed a similar result to that of whole textbooks, while the proportion of the interaction of science, technology, and society in biologyⅠ textbooks was more than that of science as a way of thinking category, the result from biologyⅡ textbooks was reversed.
      The characteristics in the aspect of scientific literacy of each unit of biologyⅠ or Ⅱ textbooks was well represented. In biologyⅠ textbooks, the proportion of science as a body of knowledge was comparatively higher in ‘circulation’, ‘respiration’, ‘excretion’, ‘stimulus and response’, ‘reproduction and development’, and ‘heredity’ units than in other units. The category of science as a way of investigation was more emphasized in ‘nutrients and digestion’ unit, and science as a way of thinking category was more emphasized in ‘characteristics of life’, and ‘life science and human life’ units than in other units. And the proportion of the interaction of science, technology, and society category was much more in ‘life science and human life’ unit than in other units. On the other hand, science as a body of knowledge category was most emphasized in ‘diversity of living matters and environment’ unit in biologyⅡ textbooks and the proportion of science as a way of investigation category was comparatively higher in ‘characteristics of cell’, and ‘metabolism’ units than in other units. And science as a way of thinking category was more emphasized in ‘continuity of life’, and ‘biology and human future’ units than in other units. The proportion of the interaction of science, technology, and society was much higher in ‘biology and human future’ unit than in other units.
      As a whole, text section of biology textbooks most emphasized science as a body of knowledge category, followed by science as a way of investigation category. Two categories of science as a way of thinking, and the interaction of science, technology, and society was also neglected like in whole textbooks. The text section of biologyⅠ or Ⅱ textbooks showed similar result to that of whole text section.
      In the figure section, the proportion of science as a body of knowledge was absolutely much more than other categories, and that of science as a way of investigation was the least. The result of figure section in biologyⅠ, or Ⅱ textbooks showed same pattern like in whole figure section.
      Almost of assessment section of biology textbooks was composed of two categories of science as a body of knowledge, and science as a way of investigation. Each proportion of these two categories was nearly same. Whereas two categories of science as a way of thinking, and the interaction of science, technology, and society were most neglected.
      Overall, the scholastic achievement test items emphasized science as a way of investigation, and science as a body of knowledge, followed by science as a way of thinking category. The interaction of science, technology, and society category was completely neglected. The significant difference between biologyⅠ and biologyⅡ in coverage of each category of scientific literacy was not found. On the whole, there was not significant difference in coverage of each category of scientific literacy through academic years except the coverage of science as way of investigation category in 2009 academic year was more than in other academic years. In the case of biologyⅠ, the coverage of science as a body of knowledge category in 2006 academic year and that of science as a way of investigation category in 2009 was more respectively than in other academic years. Whereas, the coverage of science as a body of knowledge category in 2005 academic year was more than in other academic years.
      번역하기

      The main purposes of the study were to investigate the nature and extent of scientific literacy categories coverage in high school biology textbooks and scholastic achievement test items of biology subject matter, and to find out whether or not these ...

      The main purposes of the study were to investigate the nature and extent of scientific literacy categories coverage in high school biology textbooks and scholastic achievement test items of biology subject matter, and to find out whether or not these two high school biology curriculum materials have the potential to prepare scientifically literate citizens.
      In this study 5 kinds of high school biology textbooks and 240 scholastic achievement test items between 2005 and 2010 academic years were analyzed into 4 categories of scientific literacy. The 4 categories are : (a) science as a body of knowledge, (b) science as a way of investigation, (c) science as a way of thinking, (d) the interaction of science, technology, and society.
      Overall, textbooks most emphasized science as a body of knowledge, followed by science as a way of investigation. Whereas science as a way of thinking, and the interaction of science, technology, and society were neglected in the textbooks. BiologyⅠ or Ⅱ textbooks showed a similar result to that of whole textbooks, while the proportion of the interaction of science, technology, and society in biologyⅠ textbooks was more than that of science as a way of thinking category, the result from biologyⅡ textbooks was reversed.
      The characteristics in the aspect of scientific literacy of each unit of biologyⅠ or Ⅱ textbooks was well represented. In biologyⅠ textbooks, the proportion of science as a body of knowledge was comparatively higher in ‘circulation’, ‘respiration’, ‘excretion’, ‘stimulus and response’, ‘reproduction and development’, and ‘heredity’ units than in other units. The category of science as a way of investigation was more emphasized in ‘nutrients and digestion’ unit, and science as a way of thinking category was more emphasized in ‘characteristics of life’, and ‘life science and human life’ units than in other units. And the proportion of the interaction of science, technology, and society category was much more in ‘life science and human life’ unit than in other units. On the other hand, science as a body of knowledge category was most emphasized in ‘diversity of living matters and environment’ unit in biologyⅡ textbooks and the proportion of science as a way of investigation category was comparatively higher in ‘characteristics of cell’, and ‘metabolism’ units than in other units. And science as a way of thinking category was more emphasized in ‘continuity of life’, and ‘biology and human future’ units than in other units. The proportion of the interaction of science, technology, and society was much higher in ‘biology and human future’ unit than in other units.
      As a whole, text section of biology textbooks most emphasized science as a body of knowledge category, followed by science as a way of investigation category. Two categories of science as a way of thinking, and the interaction of science, technology, and society was also neglected like in whole textbooks. The text section of biologyⅠ or Ⅱ textbooks showed similar result to that of whole text section.
      In the figure section, the proportion of science as a body of knowledge was absolutely much more than other categories, and that of science as a way of investigation was the least. The result of figure section in biologyⅠ, or Ⅱ textbooks showed same pattern like in whole figure section.
      Almost of assessment section of biology textbooks was composed of two categories of science as a body of knowledge, and science as a way of investigation. Each proportion of these two categories was nearly same. Whereas two categories of science as a way of thinking, and the interaction of science, technology, and society were most neglected.
      Overall, the scholastic achievement test items emphasized science as a way of investigation, and science as a body of knowledge, followed by science as a way of thinking category. The interaction of science, technology, and society category was completely neglected. The significant difference between biologyⅠ and biologyⅡ in coverage of each category of scientific literacy was not found. On the whole, there was not significant difference in coverage of each category of scientific literacy through academic years except the coverage of science as way of investigation category in 2009 academic year was more than in other academic years. In the case of biologyⅠ, the coverage of science as a body of knowledge category in 2006 academic year and that of science as a way of investigation category in 2009 was more respectively than in other academic years. Whereas, the coverage of science as a body of knowledge category in 2005 academic year was more than in other academic years.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 9
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 9
      • 2. 연구 문제 13
      • Ⅱ. 선행 연구 14
      • 1. 과학적 소양의 역사적 배경 14
      • Ⅰ. 서론 9
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 9
      • 2. 연구 문제 13
      • Ⅱ. 선행 연구 14
      • 1. 과학적 소양의 역사적 배경 14
      • 2. 과학적 소양의 개념 15
      • 3. 과학 교육 과정 자료의 과학적 소양 분석 19
      • Ⅲ. 연구 자료 27
      • Ⅳ. 연구 방법 28
      • 1. 고등학교 생물 교과서의 과학적 소양 분석 28
      • 1) 분석 도구 28
      • 2) 분석 방법 30
      • 2. 대학수학능력시험 생물 문항의 과학적 소양 분석 37
      • 1) 분석 도구 37
      • 2) 분석 과정 37
      • 3. 신뢰도 검증 40
      • 1) 고등학교 생물 교과서의 과학적 소양 분석의 신뢰도 검증 40
      • 2) 대학수학능력시험 생물 문항의 과학적 소양 분석의 신뢰도 검증 40
      • Ⅴ. 연구 결과 및 논의 43
      • 1. 고등학교 생물 교과서의 과학적 소양 43
      • 1) 고등학교 생물 교과서 전체의 과학적 소양 43
      • 2) 고등학교 생물 Ⅰ과 Ⅱ 교과서의 과학적 소양 46
      • 3) 고등학교 생물 교과서 단원들의 과학적 소양 48
      • 2. 고등학교 생물 교과서 영역별 과학적 소양 52
      • 1) 고등학교 생물 교과서 전체 본문 영역의 과학적 소양 52
      • 2) 고등학교 생물 I과 생물 Ⅱ 교과서 본문 영역의 과학적 소양 53
      • 3) 고등학교 생물 교과서 전체 도해 영역의 과학적 소양 56
      • 4) 고등학교 생물 Ⅰ과 생물 Ⅱ 교과서 도해 영역의 과학적 소양 57
      • 5) 고등학교 생물 교과서 전체 평가 영역의 과학적 소양 59
      • 6) 고등학교 생물 Ⅰ과 생물 Ⅱ 교과서 평가 영역의 과학적 소양 60
      • 3. 대학수학능력시험 생물 문항의 과학적 소양 62
      • 1) 대학수학능력시험 생물 전체 문항의 과학적 소양 62
      • 2) 대학수학능력시험 생물 Ⅰ과 생물 Ⅱ 문항의 과학적 소양 67
      • 3) 학년도에 따른 대학수학능력시험 생물 문항의 과학적 소양 69
      • 4) 학년도에 따른 대학수학능력시험 생물 Ⅰ과 생물 Ⅱ 문항의 과학적 소양 69
      • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 73
      • 참고 문헌 76
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. Validity, Messick, , 1989

      2. 과학과 교육과정, 교육부, , 1997

      3. Science textbook analysis, Good, , 1993

      4. Nothing to fear, much to do, Graubard, "Nothing to fear, , 1983

      5. Teaching science the STS way, Holbrook, , 1992

      6. The content of STS education, Aikenhead, , 1996

      7. Benchmarks for science literacy, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Benchmarks for science literacy, , 1993

      8. STS to enhance total curriculum, Yager, Lutz, , 1995

      9. The crisis in biology education, Yager, , 1982

      10. Referents to scientific literacy, O’Hearn, Pella, Gale, , 1966

      1. Validity, Messick, , 1989

      2. 과학과 교육과정, 교육부, , 1997

      3. Science textbook analysis, Good, , 1993

      4. Nothing to fear, much to do, Graubard, "Nothing to fear, , 1983

      5. Teaching science the STS way, Holbrook, , 1992

      6. The content of STS education, Aikenhead, , 1996

      7. Benchmarks for science literacy, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Benchmarks for science literacy, , 1993

      8. STS to enhance total curriculum, Yager, Lutz, , 1995

      9. The crisis in biology education, Yager, , 1982

      10. Referents to scientific literacy, O’Hearn, Pella, Gale, , 1966

      11. National Science Education Standards, National Research Council, , 2000

      12. College introductory biology textbooks, Blystone, , 1989

      13. Ideologies in school science textbooks, Knain, , 2001

      14. A History of ideas in science education, DeBoer, , 1991

      15. Science for all Americans. Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science, , 1989

      16. Process in lower school science textbooks, Newton, Gott, , 1989

      17. Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview, Laugksch, , 2000

      18. The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy, McEneaney, , 2003

      19. Science andmathematics education briefing book, Boyd, Nelson, Hudson, Weiss, , 1989

      20. A summary of research in science education-1989, Baker, , 1991

      21. School achievement: Thinking about what to test, Haertel, Calfree, , 1983

      22. 대학 수학 능력 시험과 사고력 개발, 김영채(Yung Che Kim), 대한사고개발학회, "사고개발연구, , 1993

      23. Scientific literacy and school science education, Jenkins, , 1990

      24. 과학교육의 변화 과학적 소양의 추구, 신동희, 과학교육의 변화 : 과학적 소양의 추구, , 2004

      25. 미국 과학교육의 목표와 과학적 소양, 서혜애, 한국교육개발원, "한국교육, , 1999

      26. Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools, Hurd, , 1958

      27. Textbook use and the biology education desired state, Kyle, Gottfried, , 1992

      28. 중학생과 고등학생의 과학적 소양 평가, 정영란 ( Young Lan Chung ), 최진미 ( Jin Mi Choi ), 한국과학교육학회, , 2007

      29. 우리 나라 학생들의 과학적 소양 성취도, 신동희, 노국향, 한국과학교육학회, "한국과학교육학회지, , 2002

      30. How well do middle school science programs measure up?, Kesidou, Roseman, , 2002

      31. STS interactions and teaching of physics and chemistry, Solbes, Vilches, , 1997

      32. The importance of terminology in teaching K-12 science, Yager, , 1983

      33. Social issues in high school biology textbook : 1963-1983, Rosenthal, , 1984

      34. Textbook misconceptions: The climax concept of succession, Gibson, , 1996

      35. Achieving scientific literacy : from purposes to practices, Bybee, Rodger W, Heinemann, , 1997

      36. Scientific literacy and the public understanding of science, Shen, , 1975

      37. NSTA positionstatementon schoolscience education for the 70's, NationalScienceTeachers AssociationNSTA, NSTA position statement on school science education for the 70's, , 1971

      38. An exploratory study of the knowledge base for science teaching, BouJaoude, Abe-El-Khalick, , 1997

      39. Science instruction in the middle and secondary school(5th ed.), T.R, Koballa, Chiappetta, , 2002

      40. Science textbooks and science teaching : From logic to evidence, Stinner, , 1992

      41. Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy, Muth, Glynn, Reading and writing to learn science : Achieving scientific literacy, , 1994

      42. Using concept maps to analyze textbook presentations of respiration, Soyibo, , 1995

      43. What high school chemistry textbooks do well and what they do poorly, Gabea, , 1983

      44. Assessing student ability to apply science concepts in STS classrooms, Zehr, , 1992

      45. The national curriculum: A golden opportunity for scientific literacy, Holman, , 1997

      46. Summary of background study 52 : Science education in Canadian schools, Orpwood, Souque, , 1984

      47. An assessment of Caribbean integrated science textbooks practical tasks, Soyibo, An assessment of Caribbean integrated science textbooks' practical tasks, , 1998

      48. Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas?, Stern, Roseman, , 2004

      49. How do the high school biology textbooks introduce the nature of science?, Lee, Y. H., , 2007

      50. Manual for procedures for conduction content analysis of science textbooks, Fillman, Chiappetta, Sethna, , 1991

      51. Quantum mechanics and conceptual change in high school chemistry textbooks, Shiland, , 1997

      52. School textbooks and reading in science : Looking back and looking forward, Wellington, , 2001

      53. 과학적 소양에 근거한 제7차 중학교 과학 교과서의 분석, 이미경, 김성원, 김희정, 최성연, 이재은, 황윤진, 한국과학교육학회, "한국과학교육학회지, , 2006

      54. A quantitative analysis of physics textbooks for scientific literacy themes, Wilkinson, , 1999

      55. The inclusion of STS in the most frequently used secondary science textbooks, Chiang-Soong, Yager, , 1993

      56. A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks, Sethna, Chiappetta, Chiappetaa,E.L, Fillman, , 1991

      57. The inquiry level of junior highactivities : Implications to science teaching, Pizzini, Abell, The inquiry level of junior high activities : Implications to science teaching, , 1991

      58. 대학수학능력시험 화학Ⅱ 문항에 대한 학생들의 응답 분석, 이양락, 정경문, 이범홍, 홍미영, 한국과학교육학회, "한국과학교육학회지, , 2002

      59. Analysis of science textbook picture about energy and pupils’ reading of them, Ogborn, Ormerod, Stylianidou, , 2002

      60. Relationship between STS approach, scientific literacy, and achievement biology, Mbajiorgu, "Relationship between STS approach, , 2003

      61. 우리나라 고등학생들의 과학적 소양 성취에 대한 추이 분석, 김지영, 김경희, 이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소, "교과교육학연구, , 2009

      62. Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula : The case of Lebanon, BouJaoude, , 2002

      63. The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths of science, McComas, , 1998

      64. 청소년의 과학적 소양 향상을 위한 문제해결 모형 개발 연구, 곽승진(Seung-Jin Kwak), 한국도서관·정보학회, "한국도서관?정보학회지, , 2005

      65. 대학수학능력시험의 지구과학영역 문항 및 응시자 반응 분석, 이양락, 한국지구과학회, "한국지구과학교육학회지, , 2001

      66. A profile of high school biology textbooks usingscientific literacy recommendations, Lumpe, Beck, , 1996

      67. 우리나라, 미국, 영국, 일본, 싱가포르의 과학과 교육과정 비교, 김주훈, 이미경, "우리나라, , 2004

      68. The representation of science-technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks, Gardner, , 1999

      69. Scientific literacy : Towards a balance for setting goals for school science programs, Roberts, , 1983

      70. The elaboration of concepts in three biology textbooks : Facilitating student learning, Lloyd, , 1990

      71. Do middle school life science textbooks provide a balance of scientific literacy themes, Chiappetta, Fillman, Sethna, , 1993

      72. Toward a scientific understanding of the public understanding of science and technology, Miller, , 1992

      73. Characteristics of laboratory exercises included in sciencetextbooks in Catalonia(Spain), Tamir, Pilar-Garcia, , 1992

      74. An analysis of earch science textbooks for presentation of aspects of scientific literacy, Garcia, , 1985

      75. Students’ and teachers’ conception of the nature of science : A review of the research, Lederman, , 1992

      76. Misconceptions & alternative conceptions in science textbooks: The role of teachers as filters, Baba, Abimbola, , 1996

      77. Improving science teachers' conception of nature of science: A critical review of the literature, Abd-El-Khalick, Lederman, Improving science teachers' conception of nature of science : A critical review of the literature, , 2000

      78. Sectional drawings from science textbooks: An experimental investigation into pupils understanding, Brown, Constable, Campbell, , 1988

      79. Secondary science teachers ' attitudes toward and beliefs aboutscience reading and science textbooks, Yore, , 1991

      80. Challenges in assessing student school, district, state,and national performance at high school level, Reidy, Wise, "Challenges in assessing student, , 2005

      81. The nature and extent of scientific literacy themes coverage in Zambia high school biology curriculum, Chabalengula, , 2006

      82. The spectrum of scientific literacy : An in-depth look at what it means to be scientifically literate, Koballa, Kemp, Evans, , 1997

      83. Elaborate analogies in science text : Tools for enhancing preservice teachers’ knowledge and attitudes, Paris, Glynn, , 2004

      84. An attainable version of high literacy : Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing, Bereiter, Scardamalia, , 1987

      85. Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals, McGinn,M.K., Roth,W.M., Bowen,G.M., , 1999

      86. Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the united states for inclusion of the nature of science, Fillman, Chiappetta, , 2007

      87. Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press article about science and technology, Sklaveniti, Koulaids, Dimopoulos, , 2003

      88. Questioning levels of junior high school science textbooks and their implications for learning textual information, Shephardson, Pizzini, , 1991

      89. A Quantitative analysis of high school chemistry textbooks for scientific literacy themes and expository learning aids, Fillman, Chiappetta, Sethna, , 1991

      90. A content analysis of sixth-grade, seventh-grade, and eighth-grade science textbooks with regard to the nature of science, Phillips, "A content analysis of sixth-grade, , 2006

      91. Scientific literacy for citizenship : Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues, Kolsto, , 2001

      92. Dev elopment of an in strument to as ses ssecondary school student s ' under standing of the nature of scientific knowledge, Ander son, Rubb a, , 1978

      93. The differential role of physical science and biology in achieving scientific literacy in South Africa-A possible explanation, Laugksch, , 2000

      94. Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform, DeBoer, Scientific literacy : Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform, , 2000

      95. Instructional validity, opportunity to learn and equity : New standards examinations for the California mathematics renaissance, Resnick, Yoon, "Instructional validity, , 1998

      96. An exploratory study of the relationships among sciencetechnology, and society (STS) issues as conceived by fifth grade students, Thirunarayanan, "An exploratory study of the relationships among science, , 1998

      97. An analysis of lab work tasks used in science teaching at upper secondary school and university levels in several European countries, Buty, Veillard, Tiberghien, , 2001

      98. An analysis of junior high school level physical science textbooks for scientific literacy as defined by Project Synthesis Goal Clusters, Baarah, , 1991

      99. Biology textbook coverage of selected aspects of scientific literacywith implications for student interest and recall of text information, Fillman, , 1989

      100. 대학 수학능력 시험의 수리· 탐구 영역중 지구과학 교과에 관련된 탐구능력 측정을 위한 행동 요소의 추출과 평가 목표의 상세화 연구Ⅰ, 이경훈, 우종옥, 이항로, 한국과학교육학회, "한국과학교육학회지, , 1991

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼