국립중앙도서관 "우편 복사 서비스"로 연결 됩니다.
ScienceON
KISS
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing quality of life after analyzing the relationship between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects of ...
다국어 입력
あ
ぁ
か
が
さ
ざ
た
だ
な
は
ば
ぱ
ま
や
ゃ
ら
わ
ゎ
ん
い
ぃ
き
ぎ
し
じ
ち
ぢ
に
ひ
び
ぴ
み
り
う
ぅ
く
ぐ
す
ず
つ
づ
っ
ぬ
ふ
ぶ
ぷ
む
ゆ
ゅ
る
え
ぇ
け
げ
せ
ぜ
て
で
ね
へ
べ
ぺ
め
れ
お
ぉ
こ
ご
そ
ぞ
と
ど
の
ほ
ぼ
ぽ
も
よ
ょ
ろ
を
ア
ァ
カ
サ
ザ
タ
ダ
ナ
ハ
バ
パ
マ
ヤ
ャ
ラ
ワ
ヮ
ン
イ
ィ
キ
ギ
シ
ジ
チ
ヂ
ニ
ヒ
ビ
ピ
ミ
リ
ウ
ゥ
ク
グ
ス
ズ
ツ
ヅ
ッ
ヌ
フ
ブ
プ
ム
ユ
ュ
ル
エ
ェ
ケ
ゲ
セ
ゼ
テ
デ
ヘ
ベ
ペ
メ
レ
オ
ォ
コ
ゴ
ソ
ゾ
ト
ド
ノ
ホ
ボ
ポ
モ
ヨ
ョ
ロ
ヲ
―
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
예시)
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
А
Б
В
Г
Д
Е
Ё
Ж
З
И
Й
К
Л
М
Н
О
П
Р
С
Т
У
Ф
Х
Ц
Ч
Ш
Щ
Ъ
Ы
Ь
Э
Ю
Я
а
б
в
г
д
е
ё
ж
з
и
й
к
л
м
н
о
п
р
с
т
у
ф
х
ц
ч
ш
щ
ъ
ы
ь
э
ю
я
′
″
℃
Å
￠
￡
￥
¤
℉
‰
＄
％
Ｆ
￦
㎕
㎖
㎗
ℓ
㎘
㏄
㎣
㎤
㎥
㎦
㎙
㎚
㎛
㎜
㎝
㎞
㎟
㎠
㎡
㎢
㏊
㎍
㎎
㎏
㏏
㎈
㎉
㏈
㎧
㎨
㎰
㎱
㎲
㎳
㎴
㎵
㎶
㎷
㎸
㎹
㎀
㎁
㎂
㎃
㎄
㎺
㎻
㎽
㎾
㎿
㎐
㎑
㎒
㎓
㎔
Ω
㏀
㏁
㎊
㎋
㎌
㏖
㏅
㎭
㎮
㎯
㏛
㎩
㎪
㎫
㎬
㏝
㏐
㏓
㏃
㏉
㏜
㏆
RISS 인기검색어
위장암 환자의 삶의 질에 영향을 미치는 요인 = Factors Influencing Quality of Life in Patients with Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
한글로보기https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104101088
- 저자
- 발행기관
- 학술지명
- 권호사항
-
발행연도
2008
-
작성언어
Korean
-
주제어
Gastrointestinal neoplasms ; Depression ; Health promotion ; Quality of life ; 위장암 ; 우울 ; 건강증진 ; 삶의 질
-
등재정보
KCI등재,SSCI,SCIE,SCOPUS
-
자료형태
학술저널
- 발행기관 URL
-
수록면
649-655(7쪽)
-
KCI 피인용횟수
18
- DOI식별코드
- 제공처
- 소장기관
-
0
상세조회 -
0
다운로드
부가정보
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing quality of life after analyzing the relationship
between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects
of this study were 63 people who underwent treatments from 2 general hospitals in Seoul and Daejeon and had no
recurrence in stages I & II of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Data was collected from March 1 to April 30, 2006. A questionnaire
consisting of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II)
and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was given. The collected data was analyzed with the
SPSS program which was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression.
Results: The major findings of this study were as follows: 1) There was a significant relationship between depression
(r=-.639, p=.000), health promotion (r=.407, p=.001) and quality of life. 2) Significant factors were depression (F=-4.091,
p=.000) and health promotion (F=2.375, p=.021) that explained 46% of quality of life (F=10.022, p=.000). Conclusion:
Cancer patients experienced extreme depression which led to a negative effect on quality of life. Health promotion was
an important variable to the quality of life and it gave the patients motivation for having a will and belief for better health.
between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects
of this study were 63 people who underwent treatments from 2 general hospitals in Seoul and Daejeon and had no
recurrence in stages I & II of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Data was collected from March 1 to April 30, 2006. A questionnaire
consisting of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II)
and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was given. The collected data was analyzed with the
SPSS program which was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression.
Results: The major findings of this study were as follows: 1) There was a significant relationship between depression
(r=-.639, p=.000), health promotion (r=.407, p=.001) and quality of life. 2) Significant factors were depression (F=-4.091,
p=.000) and health promotion (F=2.375, p=.021) that explained 46% of quality of life (F=10.022, p=.000). Conclusion:
Cancer patients experienced extreme depression which led to a negative effect on quality of life. Health promotion was
an important variable to the quality of life and it gave the patients motivation for having a will and belief for better health.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing quality of life after analyzing the relationship
between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects
of this study were 63 people who underwent treatments from 2 general hospitals in Seoul and Daejeon and had no
recurrence in stages I & II of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Data was collected from March 1 to April 30, 2006. A questionnaire
consisting of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II)
and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was given. The collected data was analyzed with the
SPSS program which was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression.
Results: The major findings of this study were as follows: 1) There was a significant relationship between depression
(r=-.639, p=.000), health promotion (r=.407, p=.001) and quality of life. 2) Significant factors were depression (F=-4.091,
p=.000) and health promotion (F=2.375, p=.021) that explained 46% of quality of life (F=10.022, p=.000). Conclusion:
Cancer patients experienced extreme depression which led to a negative effect on quality of life. Health promotion was
an important variable to the quality of life and it gave the patients motivation for having a will and belief for better health.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing quality of life after analyzing the relationship
between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects
of this study were 63 people who underwent treatments from 2 general hospitals in Seoul and Daejeon and had no
recurrence in stages I & II of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Data was collected from March 1 to April 30, 2006. A questionnaire
consisting of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II)
and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was given. The collected data was analyzed with the
SPSS program which was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression.
Results: The major findings of this study were as follows: 1) There was a significant relationship between depression
(r=-.639, p=.000), health promotion (r=.407, p=.001) and quality of life. 2) Significant factors were depression (F=-4.091,
p=.000) and health promotion (F=2.375, p=.021) that explained 46% of quality of life (F=10.022, p=.000). Conclusion:
Cancer patients experienced extreme depression which led to a negative effect on quality of life. Health promotion was
an important variable to the quality of life and it gave the patients motivation for having a will and belief for better health.
between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects
of this study were 63 people who underwent treatments from 2 general hospitals in Seoul and Daejeon and had no
recurrence in stages I & II of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Data was collected from March 1 to April 30, 2006. A questionnaire
consisting of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II)
and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was given. The collected data was analyzed with the
SPSS program which was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression.
Results: The major findings of this study were as follows: 1) There was a significant relationship between depression
(r=-.639, p=.000), health promotion (r=.407, p=.001) and quality of life. 2) Significant factors were depression (F=-4.091,
p=.000) and health promotion (F=2.375, p=.021) that explained 46% of quality of life (F=10.022, p=.000). Conclusion:
Cancer patients experienced extreme depression which led to a negative effect on quality of life. Health promotion was
an important variable to the quality of life and it gave the patients motivation for having a will and belief for better health.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing quality of life after analyzing the relationship between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects o...
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the factors influencing quality of life after analyzing the relationship
between depression, health promotion and quality of life in patients with gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods: The subjects
of this study were 63 people who underwent treatments from 2 general hospitals in Seoul and Daejeon and had no
recurrence in stages I & II of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Data was collected from March 1 to April 30, 2006. A questionnaire
consisting of Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D), Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II (HPLP II)
and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) was given. The collected data was analyzed with the
SPSS program which was used for descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients and hierarchical multiple regression.
Results: The major findings of this study were as follows: 1) There was a significant relationship between depression
(r=-.639, p=.000), health promotion (r=.407, p=.001) and quality of life. 2) Significant factors were depression (F=-4.091,
p=.000) and health promotion (F=2.375, p=.021) that explained 46% of quality of life (F=10.022, p=.000). Conclusion:
Cancer patients experienced extreme depression which led to a negative effect on quality of life. Health promotion was
an important variable to the quality of life and it gave the patients motivation for having a will and belief for better health.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김유진, "직장암 환자들의 수술 전 삶의 질 양상: 남녀 집단별 비교분석" 한국임상심리학회 22 (22): 743-762, 2003
2 서연옥, "유방암 환자의 삶의 질 영향요인" 한국간호과학회 37 (37): 459-466, 2007
3 양영희, "위암환자의 항암 화학요법에 따른 피로와 삶의 질 변화 양상" 한국간호과학회 32 (32): 482-491, 2002
4 이평숙, "암 환자의 지각된 스트레스,분노표현방식 및 우울간의 관계" 한국간호과학회 35 (35): 195-205, 2005
5 Korea National Statistical Office, "The statistics of death rate in Korea"
6 Wittmann, M., "The relation between the experience of time and psychological distress in patients with hematological malignancies" 4 : 357-363, 2006
7 Maeda, T, "The effect of postoperative symptom experience, and personality and psychosocial factors on depression among postgastrectomy patients in Japan" 29 : 437-444, 2006
8 Park,E.H, "The effect of breast self-examination (BSE) promotion program on BSE compliance & health promoting behaviors in adult women" Konkuk University 2003
9 Walker, S. N, "The Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. College of Nursing" University of Nebraska Medical Center 1995
10 Radloff,L.S, "The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population" 1 : 385-401, 1977
1 김유진, "직장암 환자들의 수술 전 삶의 질 양상: 남녀 집단별 비교분석" 한국임상심리학회 22 (22): 743-762, 2003
2 서연옥, "유방암 환자의 삶의 질 영향요인" 한국간호과학회 37 (37): 459-466, 2007
3 양영희, "위암환자의 항암 화학요법에 따른 피로와 삶의 질 변화 양상" 한국간호과학회 32 (32): 482-491, 2002
4 이평숙, "암 환자의 지각된 스트레스,분노표현방식 및 우울간의 관계" 한국간호과학회 35 (35): 195-205, 2005
5 Korea National Statistical Office, "The statistics of death rate in Korea"
6 Wittmann, M., "The relation between the experience of time and psychological distress in patients with hematological malignancies" 4 : 357-363, 2006
7 Maeda, T, "The effect of postoperative symptom experience, and personality and psychosocial factors on depression among postgastrectomy patients in Japan" 29 : 437-444, 2006
8 Park,E.H, "The effect of breast self-examination (BSE) promotion program on BSE compliance & health promoting behaviors in adult women" Konkuk University 2003
9 Walker, S. N, "The Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. College of Nursing" University of Nebraska Medical Center 1995
10 Radloff,L.S, "The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population" 1 : 385-401, 1977
11 Lee, E. H, "Statistical methods for health care research" Koonja 2006
12 Ward, W. L., "Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal (FACT-C) quality of life instrument" 8 : 181-195, 1999
13 Battle, J, "Relationship between self-esteem and depression" 42 : 745-746, 1978
14 Ferrans,C.E, "Quality of life: Conceptual issue" 6 : 248-254, 1990
15 Wu, C, "Quality of life of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy" 21 : 777-782, 1997
16 Guren, M. G., "Quality of life during radiotherapy for rectal cancer" 39 : 587-594, 2003
17 Jeon, K. K, "Preliminary development of Korean version of CES-D" 11 : 65-76, 1992
18 Schultz, A. A., "Predictors of quality of life in rural patients with cancer" 24 : 12-19, 2001
19 Cancer incidence in Korea, "Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affair data"
20 Wilson, T. R, "Measurement of health-related quality of life in the early follow-up of colon and rectal cancer" 49 : 1692-1702, 2006
21 Pender, N. J, "Health promotion in nursing practice" Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall 2002
22 Molife, R, "Gender and survival in malignant tumors" 27 : 201-209, 2001
23 Mock, V, "Fatigue and quality of life outcomes of exercise during cancer treatment" 9 : 119-127, 2001
24 Burnham, T. R, "Effects of exercise on physiological and psychological variables in cancer survivors" 34 : 1863-1867, 2002
25 Kim, H., "Development and validation of Korean Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)" 22 : 215-229, 2003
26 Taechaboonsermsak, P, "Causal relationship between health promoting behavior and quality of life in cervical cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy" 36 : 1568-1575, 2005
27 Mutrie, N., "Benefits of supervised group exercise programme for women being treated for early stage breast cancer:Pragmatic randomised controlled trial" 10 : 517-522, 2007
28 Yoon, H. J, "A study on the prognosis and prognostic factors of gastric proper muscle cancer" 41 : 87-93, 2003
29 Lee,S.H, "A study on professional medical team support and information needs of patients with colon cancer" Yonsei University 2006
30 Courneya, K. S, "A randomized trial of exercise and quality of life in colorectal cancer survivors" 12 : 347-357, 2003
동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문
-
- 한국간호과학회
- 김은경
- 2008
- KCI등재,SSCI,SCIE,SCOPUS
-
- 한국간호과학회
- 김춘미
- 2008
- KCI등재,SSCI,SCIE,SCOPUS
-
- 한국간호과학회
- 변영순
- 2008
- KCI등재,SSCI,SCIE,SCOPUS
-
- 한국간호과학회
- 김혜령
- 2008
- KCI등재,SSCI,SCIE,SCOPUS
분석정보
인용정보 인용지수 설명보기
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
| 2008-11-07 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한간호학회지 -> Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing | |
| 2008-01-01 | 평가 | SSCI 등재 (등재후보2차) | |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (등재유지) |  |
| 2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
| 2005-02-25 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 대한간호학회 -> 한국간호과학회영문명 : Korean Academy Of Nursing -> Korean Society of Nursing Science | |
| 2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
| 2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
| 1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.45 | 1.24 | 1.62 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.52 | 1.55 | 2.24 | 0.21 |
이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료
나만을 위한 추천자료
