RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      시장지원제도가 국내 외식기업의 해외시장 진입유형 선택에 미치는 영향 = The Influences of Market-Supporting Institutions on the Choice of Entry Modes of Korean Food Service Firms

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108162566

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this research is to verify the determinants of Korean food service firms’ choice of foreign market entry mode by applying the institution theory. It analyzed how intellectual property rights protection, trade freedom, and investment freedom, which are critical market-supporting institutions for foreign food service firms, affect the choice of entry mode. The results of the ordinal logistic regression analysis by dividing the entry mode into transaction mode, alliance mode, and investment mode according to the level of control and resource commitment are as follows. First, the weaker the host country's institution to protect intellectual property rights, the more foreign companies choose entry mode with a higher level of control and resource commitment. It is interpreted that if intellectual property rights, which are important for food service firms, are not properly protected, foreign companies choose an entry mode with higher control in spite of investment burden. Second, the stricter the trade freedom institution is implemented, the higher the level of control and resource commitment is preferred. Since the taste and price of food matter a lot in the restaurant industry, the possibility of bringing in food ingredients and procurement costs are very critical in order to implement the same taste and price as in Korea in a foreign country. Therefore, if free trade is guaranteed, they would try to secure taste and price competitiveness by taking out essential ingredients directly from Korea. The reason why the transaction is internalized is that Korean food ingredients are not actively traded in overseas markets, so it is not only difficult to obtain locally, but also very expensive. Third, the hypothesis for the investment freedom institution is not statistically adopted, which is inferred to be because the headquarters' control is secured to a considerable extent even in master franchise contracts due to the nature of the food service industry. This study is of great significance in that it empirically identified that when Korean food service companies enter overseas markets, they change their entry strategies according to the market-supporting institutions of host countries.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this research is to verify the determinants of Korean food service firms’ choice of foreign market entry mode by applying the institution theory. It analyzed how intellectual property rights protection, trade freedom, and investment f...

      The purpose of this research is to verify the determinants of Korean food service firms’ choice of foreign market entry mode by applying the institution theory. It analyzed how intellectual property rights protection, trade freedom, and investment freedom, which are critical market-supporting institutions for foreign food service firms, affect the choice of entry mode. The results of the ordinal logistic regression analysis by dividing the entry mode into transaction mode, alliance mode, and investment mode according to the level of control and resource commitment are as follows. First, the weaker the host country's institution to protect intellectual property rights, the more foreign companies choose entry mode with a higher level of control and resource commitment. It is interpreted that if intellectual property rights, which are important for food service firms, are not properly protected, foreign companies choose an entry mode with higher control in spite of investment burden. Second, the stricter the trade freedom institution is implemented, the higher the level of control and resource commitment is preferred. Since the taste and price of food matter a lot in the restaurant industry, the possibility of bringing in food ingredients and procurement costs are very critical in order to implement the same taste and price as in Korea in a foreign country. Therefore, if free trade is guaranteed, they would try to secure taste and price competitiveness by taking out essential ingredients directly from Korea. The reason why the transaction is internalized is that Korean food ingredients are not actively traded in overseas markets, so it is not only difficult to obtain locally, but also very expensive. Third, the hypothesis for the investment freedom institution is not statistically adopted, which is inferred to be because the headquarters' control is secured to a considerable extent even in master franchise contracts due to the nature of the food service industry. This study is of great significance in that it empirically identified that when Korean food service companies enter overseas markets, they change their entry strategies according to the market-supporting institutions of host countries.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼