The concept of industrial competitiveness, which emerged in the United States during the 1980s, has now become a critical issue for many countries. An intensive comparative survey on the industrial competitiveness of Japan, the United States, Europe, ...
The concept of industrial competitiveness, which emerged in the United States during the 1980s, has now become a critical issue for many countries. An intensive comparative survey on the industrial competitiveness of Japan, the United States, Europe, and Asia, was carried out in 1999 and 2000, and it clearly revealed each country's comparative strengths and weakness. The surveys cover 290 items of industrial technologies categorized in 14 fields from materials, devices, and system engineering to production technology and management technology. This survey implies that management of technology (MOT), namely innovation management is a critical factor recovering and sustaining competitiveness. It should be noted that the paradigm shift of innovation management from the catch-up "incremental model" to the front-runner "radical model,"requires completely different approaches. In this paper, a "cross-generational framework" for next generation innovation model is derived from the linear model to "market finding" Kline model, the to the third "market experiment abduction mode" and finally to "market creation " interactive model. Furthermore, a new type of technologist, "techno-producers," who come up with creative objectives and coordinate the practical program to achieve the objective is proposed. The linkage among industry, academia and government, and their higher integration are critical important. Finally, this paper introduces an important concept of "symbolic competitiveness, " a philosophical point of view that suggest a redefinition of the current concept of competitiveness for future world prosperity.