RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Korean EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Uses of Count/Mass Nouns

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103979485

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study explores Korean EFL learners’ perceptions of quantification and their grammatical sensitivity in the use of count/mass nouns. To investigate the perceptions of adult learners and young learners, it compared the perceptions of thirty children with those of thirty adults using a quantity judgment task. For the adult group, a grammaticality judgment task was additionally administered to investigate their actual use of count/mass nouns. The findings show that both the young and adult learners exhibit a consistent pattern in their perceptions of count/mass nouns giving support to the results obtained in studies which addressed the same topic with learners of different L1 and L2 backgrounds. In the grammaticality judgment task, the adult participants judged the grammaticality of count nouns and subject mass nouns appropriately. They showed a tendency to judge quantity based on numbers for the object mass nouns and the flexible nouns. These results imply that the adult participants’ use of count/mass nouns match their perceptions of count/mass distinction.
      번역하기

      This study explores Korean EFL learners’ perceptions of quantification and their grammatical sensitivity in the use of count/mass nouns. To investigate the perceptions of adult learners and young learners, it compared the perceptions of thirty child...

      This study explores Korean EFL learners’ perceptions of quantification and their grammatical sensitivity in the use of count/mass nouns. To investigate the perceptions of adult learners and young learners, it compared the perceptions of thirty children with those of thirty adults using a quantity judgment task. For the adult group, a grammaticality judgment task was additionally administered to investigate their actual use of count/mass nouns. The findings show that both the young and adult learners exhibit a consistent pattern in their perceptions of count/mass nouns giving support to the results obtained in studies which addressed the same topic with learners of different L1 and L2 backgrounds. In the grammaticality judgment task, the adult participants judged the grammaticality of count nouns and subject mass nouns appropriately. They showed a tendency to judge quantity based on numbers for the object mass nouns and the flexible nouns. These results imply that the adult participants’ use of count/mass nouns match their perceptions of count/mass distinction.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Quine, W. V. O., "Word and object" MIT Press 1960

      2 Chierchia, G., "Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives" Lawrence Erlbaum 1994

      3 Middleton, E. L., "Separating the chaff from the oats: Evidence for a conceptual distinction between count noun and mass noun aggregates" 50 (50): 371-394, 2004

      4 Bloom, P., "Semantic structure and language development" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1990

      5 Yuko Yamashita, "Second language and cognition: Conceptual categorization of count/mass nouns in English with Japanese university students" 13 (13): 363-390, 2011

      6 Neal Snape, "Resetting the nominal mapping parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count-mass distinction" 11 (11): 63-79, 2008

      7 Chierchia, G., "Reference to kinds across languages" 6 : 339-405, 1998

      8 Barner, D, "Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count" 97 : 41-66, 2005

      9 Bloom, P., "Possible individuals in language and cognition" 5 (5): 90-94, 1996

      10 Chierchia, G., "Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter,”" 70 : 53-103, 1998

      1 Quine, W. V. O., "Word and object" MIT Press 1960

      2 Chierchia, G., "Syntactic theory and first language acquisition: Cross-linguistic perspectives" Lawrence Erlbaum 1994

      3 Middleton, E. L., "Separating the chaff from the oats: Evidence for a conceptual distinction between count noun and mass noun aggregates" 50 (50): 371-394, 2004

      4 Bloom, P., "Semantic structure and language development" Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1990

      5 Yuko Yamashita, "Second language and cognition: Conceptual categorization of count/mass nouns in English with Japanese university students" 13 (13): 363-390, 2011

      6 Neal Snape, "Resetting the nominal mapping parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count-mass distinction" 11 (11): 63-79, 2008

      7 Chierchia, G., "Reference to kinds across languages" 6 : 339-405, 1998

      8 Barner, D, "Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count" 97 : 41-66, 2005

      9 Bloom, P., "Possible individuals in language and cognition" 5 (5): 90-94, 1996

      10 Chierchia, G., "Plurality of mass nouns and the notion of “semantic parameter,”" 70 : 53-103, 1998

      11 Wisniewski, E. J., "On the equivalence of superordinate concepts" 60 : 269-298, 1996

      12 Nemoto, N., "On mass denotations of bare nouns in Japanese and Korean" 43 (43): 383-413, 2005

      13 Gathercole, V., "More and more and more about more" 40 : 73-104, 1985

      14 Inagaki, S, "Lexical and syntactic sources of individuation: Evidence from quantity judgment in Japanese and English" International Christian University 2006

      15 Whorf B. L., "Language, thought, and reality" MIT Press 1956

      16 Inagaki, S, "Countability in absence of count syntax: Evidence from Japanese quantity judgments" 8 : 111-125, 2009

      17 Hua, D, "Chinese ESL learners’ understanding of the English count-mass distinction" Shanghai International Studies University and Hunan University 2005

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2005-06-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 21영어영문학회 -> 21세기영어영문학회
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.25 0.25 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.26 0.25 0.49 0.07
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼