소방용 화학보호복 착용 현장대원의일상 훈련용 프로토콜 설계 및 활동성 분석 = Design of Daily Training Protocol for Field Crews Wearing Chemical Protective Clothing for Firefighting and Analysis of Activity

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The present article is concerned with a study on the daily training protocol for field crews wearing chemical protectionclothing for firefighting and the analysis of activity. To improve coping ability of & secure safety for firefighting crewsinitially incorporated in the fields of chemical accident & chemical terror, 10 steps in total of daily training protocol havebeen designed. The designed protocol is largely composed of the extensive activity protocol for daily adaptation offirefighting chemical protection clothing (steps 1, 2, 6, 7 & 9), the precision operation protocol utilizing hands (steps 3,4 & 5), and the protocol requiring strong physical burdens (steps 8 & 10). According to the measurement results for activityas a result of the protocol, the average maximum heart rate upon wearing the firefighting chemical protection clothing wasshown to increase by step 1 20.32%, step 2 18.69%, step 3 25.23%, step 4 34.77%, step 5 27.44%, step 6 30.24%, step7 25.33%, step 8 22.25%, step 9 22.80% and step 10 20.85% compared with the time of not wearing them. The averagemaximum breathing rate was shown to increase by step 3 1.92%, step 4 4.11%, step 5 1.24%, step 6 3.95%, step 7 0.93%,step 8 10.23%, step 9 3.36% and step 10 15.10%, except for steps 1 & 2.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 논문은 소방용 화학보호복 착용 현장대원의 일상 훈련용 프로토콜 설계 및 활동성 분석에 관한 연구이다. 화학사고 및 화학테러 현장에 최초 투입되는 소방대원들의 대처능력 향상 및 안전성 확보를 위해 총 10단계의 일상 훈련용 프로토콜을 설계하였다. 설계된 프로토콜은 크게 소방용 화학보호복 일상 적응을 위한 광범위 활동 프로토콜(1,2, 6, 7, 9단계)과 손을 활용한 정밀작업 프로토콜(3, 4, 5단계) 그리고 강한 신체적 부담을 요구하는 프로토콜(8, 10단계)로 구성하였다. 프로토콜에 따른 활동성 측정결과 소방용 화학보호복 착용 시가 미착용 시보다 평균최대심박수는1단계 20.32%, 2단계 18.69%, 3단계 25.23%, 4단계 34.77%, 5단계 27.44%, 6단계 30.24%, 7단계 25.33%, 8단계22.25%, 9단계 22.80%, 10단계 20.85% 증가되는 것으로 나타났다. 평균최대호흡수는 1단계 및 2단계를 제외하고 3단계 1.92%, 4단계 4.11%, 5단계 1.24%, 6단계 3.95%, 7단계 0.93%, 8단계 10.23%, 9단계 3.36%, 10단계 15.10% 증가되는 것으로 나타났다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 채진, "유해화학물질 사고의 재난대응체계 개선방안" 한국행정학회 49 (49): 473-506, 2015

2 방창훈, "소방용 화학보호복 착용시 신체변화에 관한 연구" 한국방재학회 15 (15): 231-236, 2015

3 김시연, "소방방화복을 착용했을 때의 소방진압 업무 적합도 평가 프로토콜의 개발" 한국화재소방학회 30 (30): 138-148, 2016

4 "https://support.polar.com/e_manuals/M600/Polar-M600-usermanual-Korean/Content/heart-rate-zones.htm"

5 "https://m.post.naver.com/viewer/postView.nhn?volumeNo=12117742&memberNo=2610633"

6 "http://www.index.go.kr/potal/stts/idxMain/selectPoSttsIdxSearch.do?idx_cd=4088&stts_cd=408802"

7 J. K. Park, "System Improvement for Chemical Accident Response" Korea Environment Institute 1 (1): 1-29, 2013

8 R. Ilmarinen, "Physiological Evaluation of Chemical Protective Suit Systems (CPSS) in Hot Conditions" 10 (10): 215-226, 2004

9 National Institute of Chemical Safety, "NICS Firefighter Chemical Disaster Response Process"

10 "Ministry of Employment and Labor Notice (No. 2017-64), Safety Certification Notice of Protective Equipment"

11 J. M. Deakin, "Development of a Bona Fide Physical Maintenance Standard for CF and DND Fire Fighters, Final Report Submitted to Canadian Forces Personnel Support Agency" Queen's University 1996

12 National 119 Rescue Headquarters, "CBR Terrorism & Accident Response Manual" 2012

13 R. S. Ericson, "Accuracy of Infrared Ear Thermometry and Traditional Temperature Methods in Young Children" 23 (23): 181-195, 1994

14 "ASTM F1154-11, Standard Practices for Qualitatively Evaluating the Comfort, Fit, Function, and Durability of Protective Ensembles and Ensemble Components"

15 Gyeonggi-do Fire Service, "A Study on the Analysis of Hazardous Material Accident Types and Improvement of Safety Management System, Research Service Final Report" 1-365, 2016

16 Korea Fire Institute, "(Standard No. 204), KFI Recognition Standard of Chemical Protective Clothing for Firefighting"