RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조직구성원 침묵행동의 사회구조적 선행요인 = Social Structural Antecedents of Individual Silence Behaviors in Organizations

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106222745

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract)

      조직에서 문제가 있다고 인지하거나 개선해야 할 사항이 있음에도 대다수 구성원들은 침묵 상태에 머물게 되고, 이는 조직에 큰 문제를 가져오게 된다. 침묵행동의 중요성에 대한 인식이 늘어나고 있지만 침묵행동의 원인에 관한 연구는 제한적으로 이루어졌다. 지금까지 연구자들은 침묵행동의 선행요인으로 성격, 감정, 지각, 동기와 같은 개인적인 특성이나, 침묵 분위기나 조직구조와 같은 조직의 일반적 특성을 제시하였다. 그러나 조직 내 개인의 침묵행동은 본질적으로 관계적이고 구조적인 성격을 가진다. 조직구성원 들이 침묵하게 되는 것은 그들을 둘러싼 사회구조에 의해 형성된 권력 관계의 영향을 받아 나타나는 결과이다. 우리는 본 연구에서 개인이 조직에서 맺는 다양한 사회구조적 특성이 침묵행동에 미치는 영향에 관해 이론적, 실증적 탐색을 시도하였다. 구체적으로 개인의 조직 내 권력에 영향을 줄 수 있는 사회구조적 특성인 개인의 집단 내 사회적 관계에서의 중심성과 집단 내 인구통계 측면에서의 비유사성, 조직 외부 구성원과 맺고 있는 사회적 관계가 침묵행동에 미치는 영향에 대해 포괄적으로 살펴보았다. 국내 27개 조직, 43개 집단에 속한 207명의 구성원을 대상으로 한 실증 분석 결과, 개인이 집단 내 조언 네트워크에서 중심성이 낮을수록, 집단 내 인구통계 비유사성이 클수록, 그리고 조직 외부 구성원과 맺고 있는 사회적 자본의 규모가 작을수록 침묵행동을 더 하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 개인이 집단 내 조언 네트워크 중심성이 클수록 침묵행동을 덜 하는 효과는 리더와 좋은 사회적 관계를 맺고 있을 때, 즉 리더-멤버 교환관계의 질이 높을수록 더 크게 나타나는 조절 효과를 확인할 수 있었다.
      번역하기

      조직에서 문제가 있다고 인지하거나 개선해야 할 사항이 있음에도 대다수 구성원들은 침묵 상태에 머물게 되고, 이는 조직에 큰 문제를 가져오게 된다. 침묵행동의 중요성에 대한 인식이 늘...

      조직에서 문제가 있다고 인지하거나 개선해야 할 사항이 있음에도 대다수 구성원들은 침묵 상태에 머물게 되고, 이는 조직에 큰 문제를 가져오게 된다. 침묵행동의 중요성에 대한 인식이 늘어나고 있지만 침묵행동의 원인에 관한 연구는 제한적으로 이루어졌다. 지금까지 연구자들은 침묵행동의 선행요인으로 성격, 감정, 지각, 동기와 같은 개인적인 특성이나, 침묵 분위기나 조직구조와 같은 조직의 일반적 특성을 제시하였다. 그러나 조직 내 개인의 침묵행동은 본질적으로 관계적이고 구조적인 성격을 가진다. 조직구성원 들이 침묵하게 되는 것은 그들을 둘러싼 사회구조에 의해 형성된 권력 관계의 영향을 받아 나타나는 결과이다. 우리는 본 연구에서 개인이 조직에서 맺는 다양한 사회구조적 특성이 침묵행동에 미치는 영향에 관해 이론적, 실증적 탐색을 시도하였다. 구체적으로 개인의 조직 내 권력에 영향을 줄 수 있는 사회구조적 특성인 개인의 집단 내 사회적 관계에서의 중심성과 집단 내 인구통계 측면에서의 비유사성, 조직 외부 구성원과 맺고 있는 사회적 관계가 침묵행동에 미치는 영향에 대해 포괄적으로 살펴보았다. 국내 27개 조직, 43개 집단에 속한 207명의 구성원을 대상으로 한 실증 분석 결과, 개인이 집단 내 조언 네트워크에서 중심성이 낮을수록, 집단 내 인구통계 비유사성이 클수록, 그리고 조직 외부 구성원과 맺고 있는 사회적 자본의 규모가 작을수록 침묵행동을 더 하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 개인이 집단 내 조언 네트워크 중심성이 클수록 침묵행동을 덜 하는 효과는 리더와 좋은 사회적 관계를 맺고 있을 때, 즉 리더-멤버 교환관계의 질이 높을수록 더 크게 나타나는 조절 효과를 확인할 수 있었다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Most people in organizations tend to consciously keep silent about organizational problems, while only a few employees speak up their concerns. Because employee silence can have negative consequences on organizational performance, researchers’ interest in silence behaviors in organizations has increased over the past two decades. As the antecedents of silence, previous research has suggested individual characteristics such as personality, emotion, attitude, perception, and motive, along with organizational characteristics such as climate of silence and formal structures and systems. However, silence behaviors in organizations are inherently relational and structural, and they are influenced by power relations among people within these organizations. Thus, contrary to previous research on the antecedents of silence behaviors, this study focuses on the social structural characteristics of individual actors. Specifically, we explore the questions of how an employee’s in-degree centrality in an advice network, demographic dissimilarity within a group, and external social capital outside of an organization affect his or her silence behaviors in the organization. From a sample of 207 employees in 43 work groups within 27 organizations in Korea, we found that employees who are less central within a group, are more dissimilar to their work group peers, and have less external social relations tend to keep silent. Our findings also suggest the moderating effect of leader-member exchange (LMX) on the relationship between in-degree centrality and silence behaviors. We highlight the crucial impacts of structural antecedents on individual silence behaviors.
      번역하기

      Most people in organizations tend to consciously keep silent about organizational problems, while only a few employees speak up their concerns. Because employee silence can have negative consequences on organizational performance, researchers’ inter...

      Most people in organizations tend to consciously keep silent about organizational problems, while only a few employees speak up their concerns. Because employee silence can have negative consequences on organizational performance, researchers’ interest in silence behaviors in organizations has increased over the past two decades. As the antecedents of silence, previous research has suggested individual characteristics such as personality, emotion, attitude, perception, and motive, along with organizational characteristics such as climate of silence and formal structures and systems. However, silence behaviors in organizations are inherently relational and structural, and they are influenced by power relations among people within these organizations. Thus, contrary to previous research on the antecedents of silence behaviors, this study focuses on the social structural characteristics of individual actors. Specifically, we explore the questions of how an employee’s in-degree centrality in an advice network, demographic dissimilarity within a group, and external social capital outside of an organization affect his or her silence behaviors in the organization. From a sample of 207 employees in 43 work groups within 27 organizations in Korea, we found that employees who are less central within a group, are more dissimilar to their work group peers, and have less external social relations tend to keep silent. Our findings also suggest the moderating effect of leader-member exchange (LMX) on the relationship between in-degree centrality and silence behaviors. We highlight the crucial impacts of structural antecedents on individual silence behaviors.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 연구가설 Ⅲ. 연구방법 Ⅳ. 연구결과 Ⅴ. 토론 및 결론
      • Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 및 연구가설 Ⅲ. 연구방법 Ⅳ. 연구결과 Ⅴ. 토론 및 결론
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 성지영, "팀 내 개인간 인구통계학적 비유사성과 개인성과의 관계에 관한 연구 : 비선형효과를 중심으로" 한국인사조직학회 16 (16): 139-175, 2008

      2 유이정, "집단 내 개인의 비유사성이 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 비유사성 유형에 따른 차별적 효과와 과업특성의 조절효과에 관한 메타분석 연구" 한국인사조직학회 24 (24): 69-100, 2016

      3 강대석, "직장 내 왕따와 종업원 침묵: 자존감의 조절된 매개효과" 한국인사조직학회 26 (26): 1-21, 2018

      4 윤선영, "발언과 침묵: 리더십의 영향과 조직효과성" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 43-71, 2015

      5 van Knippenberg, D., "Work group diversity and group performance : An integrative model and research agenda" 89 (89): 1008-1022, 2004

      6 Jehn, K. A., "Why differences make a difference : A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups" 44 (44): 741-763, 1999

      7 Venkataramani, V., "Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations" 92 (92): 952-966, 2007

      8 Tsui, A. S., "When both similarities and dissimilarities matter : Extending the concept of relational demography" 55 (55): 899-929, 2002

      9 Venkataramani, V., "When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables" 95 (95): 582-591, 2010

      10 Harvey, P., "Voice and silence in organizations" Emerald Group 63-82, 2009

      1 성지영, "팀 내 개인간 인구통계학적 비유사성과 개인성과의 관계에 관한 연구 : 비선형효과를 중심으로" 한국인사조직학회 16 (16): 139-175, 2008

      2 유이정, "집단 내 개인의 비유사성이 직무성과에 미치는 영향: 비유사성 유형에 따른 차별적 효과와 과업특성의 조절효과에 관한 메타분석 연구" 한국인사조직학회 24 (24): 69-100, 2016

      3 강대석, "직장 내 왕따와 종업원 침묵: 자존감의 조절된 매개효과" 한국인사조직학회 26 (26): 1-21, 2018

      4 윤선영, "발언과 침묵: 리더십의 영향과 조직효과성" 한국인사조직학회 23 (23): 43-71, 2015

      5 van Knippenberg, D., "Work group diversity and group performance : An integrative model and research agenda" 89 (89): 1008-1022, 2004

      6 Jehn, K. A., "Why differences make a difference : A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups" 44 (44): 741-763, 1999

      7 Venkataramani, V., "Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations" 92 (92): 952-966, 2007

      8 Tsui, A. S., "When both similarities and dissimilarities matter : Extending the concept of relational demography" 55 (55): 899-929, 2002

      9 Venkataramani, V., "When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables" 95 (95): 582-591, 2010

      10 Harvey, P., "Voice and silence in organizations" Emerald Group 63-82, 2009

      11 Edwards, M., "Voice and silence in organizations" Emerald Group 275-291, 2009

      12 Edwards, M., "Voice and silence in organizations" Emerald Group Publishing 83-109, 2009

      13 LePine, J. A., "Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance : Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability" 86 (86): 326-336, 2001

      14 Sparrowe, R. T., "Two routes to influence : Integrating leadermember exchange and social network perspectives" 50 (50): 505-535, 2005

      15 Cross, R., "Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work" 47 (47): 928-937, 2004

      16 Katz, D., "The social psychology of Organizations" Wiley 1978

      17 Higgins, M. C, "The more, the merrier? Multiple developmental relationships and work satisfaction" 19 (19): 277-296, 2000

      18 Allen, N. J., "The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization" 63 (63): 1-18, 1990

      19 Kamdar, D., "The joint effects of personality and workplace social exchange relationships in predicting task performance and citizenship performance" 92 (92): 1286-1298, 2007

      20 See, K. E., "The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy" 116 (116): 272-285, 2011

      21 Judge, T. A., "The core self-evaluations scale : Development of a measure" 56 (56): 303-331, 2003

      22 Xu, A. J., "The bad boss takes it all : How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to influence employee silence" 26 (26): 763-774, 2015

      23 Kiewitz, C., "Suffering in silence : Investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence" 101 (101): 731-742, 2016

      24 Burt, R. S., "Structural holes: The social structure of competition" Harvard University Press 1992

      25 Liao, H., "Sticking out like a sore thumb : Employee dissimilarity and deviance at work" 57 (57): 969-1000, 2004

      26 Bowen, F., "Spirals of silence : The dynamic effects of diversity on organizational voice" 40 (40): 1393-1417, 2003

      27 Tushman, M. L, "Special boundary roles in the innovation process" 22 (22): 587-605, 1977

      28 Detert, J. R., "Speaking up to higher-ups : How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice" 21 (21): 249-270, 2010

      29 Edmondson, A. C, "Speaking up in the operating room : How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams" 40 (40): 1419-1452, 2003

      30 Perry-Smith, J. E, "Social yet creative : The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity" 49 (49): 85-101, 2006

      31 Soltis, S. M., "Social resource management : Integrating social network theory and human resource management" 12 (12): 537-573, 2018

      32 Kilduff, M., "Social networks and organizations" Sage 2003

      33 Venkataramani, V., "Social networks and employee voice : The influence of team members’ and team leaders’ social network positions on employee voice" 132 : 37-48, 2016

      34 Wasserman, S., "Social network analysis: Methods and applications" Cambridge University Press 1994

      35 Magee, J. C., "Social hierarchy : The self-reinforcing nature of power and status" 2 (2): 351-398, 2008

      36 Coleman, J. S, "Social capital in the creation of human capital" 94 : 95-120, 1988

      37 Pinder, C. C., "Research in personnel and human resources management, vol. 20" JAI 331-369, 2001

      38 Cronin, M. A., "Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams" 32 (32): 761-773, 2007

      39 Graen, G. B., "Relationship-based approach to leadership : Development of leader-member exchange(LMX)theory of leadership over 25 years : Apply ing a multi-level multi-domain perspective" 6 (6): 219-247, 1995

      40 Judge, T. A., "Relationship of core self-evaluations traits-self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability-with job satisfaction and job performance : A metaanalysis" 86 (86): 80-92, 2001

      41 Riordan, C. M, "Relational demography within groups : Past developments, contradictions, and new directions" 19 : 131-173, 2000

      42 Bowler, W. M., "Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior : A social network perspective" 91 (91): 70-82, 2006

      43 Higgins, M. C., "Reconceptualizing mentoring at work : A developmental network perspective" 26 (26): 264-288, 2001

      44 Burris, E. R., "Quitting before leaving : The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice" 93 (93): 912-922, 2008

      45 Edmondson, A. C, "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams" 44 : 350-383, 1999

      46 Islam, G., "Power, voice, and hierarchy: Exploring the antecedents of speaking up in groups" 9 (9): 93-103, 2005

      47 Ibarra, H, "Personal networks of women and minorities in management : A conceptual framework" 18 (18): 56-87, 1993

      48 Ancona, D. G, "Outward bound : Strategic for team survival in an organization" 33 (33): 334-365, 1990

      49 Kilduff, M., "Organizational social network research : Core ideas and key debates" 4 (4): 317-357, 2010

      50 Morrison, E., "Organizational silence : A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world" 25 (25): 706-725, 2000

      51 Tajfel, H., "Organizational identity: A Reader" 56-65, 1979

      52 Brass, D. J., "Networks and organizations" Harvard Business School Press 191-215, 1992

      53 Marsden, P. V, "Network data and measurement" 16 (16): 435-463, 1990

      54 Aiken, L. S., "Multiple regression : Testing interpreting interactions" SAGE 2001

      55 Liden, R. C., "Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange : An empirical assessment through scale development" 24 (24): 43-72, 1998

      56 Sunstein, C. R., "Making dumb groups smarter" 92 (92): 90-98, 2014

      57 Detert, J. R., "Leadership behavior and employee voice : Is the door really open?" 50 (50): 869-884, 2007

      58 Wang, D., "LMX and employee voice : A moderated mediation model of psychological empowerment and role clarity" 45 (45): 605-615, 2016

      59 Johnson, J. D., "Internal and external communication, boundary spanning, and innovation adoption: An over-time comparison of three explanations of internal and external innovation communication in a new organizational form" 37 (37): 238-263, 2000

      60 Van Dyne, L., "In-role perceptions buffer the negative impact of low LMX on helping and enhance the positive impact of high LMX on voice" 93 (93): 1195-1207, 2008

      61 Detert, J. R., "Implicit voice theories : Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work" 54 (54): 461-488, 2011

      62 Ibarra, H, "Homophily and differential returns : Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm" 37 (37): 422-447, 1992

      63 Granovetter, M. C., "Getting a job : A study of contacts and careers" Harvard University Press 1974

      64 Botero, I. C., "Employee voice behavior interactive effects of LMX and power distance in the United States and Colombia" 23 (23): 84-104, 2009

      65 Morrison, E. W, "Employee voice behavior : Integration and directions for future research" 5 (5): 373-412, 2011

      66 Ng, T. W., "Employee voice behavior : A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework" 33 (33): 216-234, 2012

      67 Morrison, E. W, "Employee voice and silence" 1 : 173-197, 2014

      68 Tangirala, S., "Employee silence on critical work issues : The cross level effects of procedural justice climate" 61 (61): 37-68, 2008

      69 Brinsfield, C. T, "Employee silence motives : Investigation of dimensionality and development of measures" 34 (34): 671-697, 2013

      70 Granovetter, M, "Economic action and social structure : The problem of embeddedness" 91 (91): 481-510, 1985

      71 Tangirala, S., "Doing right versus getting ahead : The effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees’voice" 98 (98): 1040-1050, 2013

      72 Knoll, M., "Do I hear the whistle. . . ? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates" 113 (113): 349-362, 2013

      73 Crant, J. M., "Dispositional antecedents of demonstration and usefulness of voice behavior" 26 (26): 285-297, 2011

      74 Riordan, C. M., "Demographic diversity and employee attitudes : An empirical examination of relational demography within work units" 82 (82): 342-358, 1997

      75 Judge, T. A., "Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction : The role of self-concordance and goal attainment" 90 (90): 257-268, 2005

      76 Van Dyne, L., "Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constucts" 40 (40): 1359-1392, 2003

      77 Preacher, K. J., "Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis" 31 (31): 437-448, 2006

      78 Bunderson, J. S., "Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams : Process and performance effects" 45 (45): 875-893, 2002

      79 Higgins, M. C, "Changing careers : The effects of social context" 22 : 595-618, 2001

      80 Freeman, L. C., "Centrality in social networks : Conceptual classification" (1) : 215-239, 1979

      81 Detert, J. R., "Can your employees really speak freely" 94 (94): 80-87, 2016

      82 Chattopadhyay, P, "Can dissimilarity lead to positive outcomes? The influence of open versus closed minds" 24 (24): 295-312, 2003

      83 Burt, R. S., "Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital" Oxford University Press 2005

      84 Joshi, A., "Bridging domains in workplace demography research : A review and reconceptualization" 37 (37): 521-552, 2011

      85 Richter, A. W., "Boundary spanners'identification, intergroup contact, and effective intergroup relations" 49 (49): 1252-1269, 2006

      86 McPherson, M., "Birds of a feather : Homophily in social networks" 27 (27): 415-444, 2001

      87 Tsui, A. S., "Beyond simple demographic effects : The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads" 32 (32): 402-423, 1989

      88 Chattopadhyay, P, "Beyond direct and symmetrical effects : The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behavior" 42 (42): 273-287, 1999

      89 Brass, D. J, "Being in the right place : A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization" 29 : 518-539, 1984

      90 Tsui, A. S., "Being different : Relational demography and organizational attachment" 549-579, 1992

      91 Hsiung, H, "Authentic leadership and employee voice behavior : A multi-level psychological process" 107 (107): 349-361, 2012

      92 Burt, R. S., "Applied network analysis:A methodological introduction" Sage 176-194, 1983

      93 Knoke, D., "Applied network analysis" 195-222, 1983

      94 Cohen, J., "Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences" Lawrence Erlbaum 2003

      95 Vakola, M., "Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence : An empirical investigation" 25 (25): 441-458, 2005

      96 Morrison, E. W., "An approach-inhibition model of employee silence : The joint effects of personal sense of power and target openness" 68 (68): 547-580, 2015

      97 Milliken, F. J., "An Exploratory study of employee silence : Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why" 40 (40): 1453-1476, 2003

      98 Galinsky, A. D., "APA handbook of personality and social psychology, vol 3(Interpersonal relationships)" American Psychological Association 2015

      99 Jackson, S. E., "APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Building and developing the organization, vol. 1" American Psychological Association 651-686, 2011

      100 Dobrow, S. R., "A review of developmental networks : Incorporating a mutuality perspective" 38 (38): 210-242, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-02-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 KCI등재
      2013-02-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-07-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.29 1.29 1.59
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.64 1.69 2.995 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼