『國民文學』좌담회에 나타난 ‘文學’ 역할과 ‘文化’ 변용

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this study, it said that Korean and Japanese intellectual"s (bureaucrats and writers) cognition of literature and culture of the age with the segmentation embedded in them were to be analysis and consideration through a discussion meeting of 「National Literature」which was created in the area mixed it up with Korean and Japanese.
The discussion meeting of 「National Literature」was reported 29 times such as 9 times in culture 7 times in literature, 7 times in politics, 2 times in education, 2 times in language, 1 time in religion and associated fine arts of 39 times of issues. However, every field including culture and literature was occasionally shuffled each other. As considered a discussion meeting related with literature from the discussion meeting of 「National Literature」, An atmosphere of exoticism of Japanese literature circles influenced colony literature, and that was generally shown to become overseas literature to be 「The Imperial Metropolis Literature」, 「The National Policy Literature」.
Literature of exoticism was sought in Japanese literature circles under the war basis while Japan was driving with militarism to be in the great powers attempting to geographical spread. Moreover, Japanese intellectuals forced the literature for Japanese empire in colony with colonial policy, and reproduced western orientalism. On the other hand, colonial Korean writers in opposite position were perceived superiority and exclusiveness of conqueror from the discussion meetings, after then they were aiming superficial identification and proceeding to adjust the current situation as the exit if new literature.
A wide variety of aspects were published that they developed solidarity and mutual dependence to overcome the social situation, colony as well as horizontal relationship with the conqueror or appropri action for those surpassing hostile comment. Furthermore, a discussion emphasizing the role of literature with purposed literature was forming corresponding to political demand and the one with educational or hedonic function.
Especially, Japanese intellectuals used and stressed culture mixed with civilization, the symbol of modern times, that established culture image of Japan Empire with modern civilization. In addition, they enhanced oriental art against the west and exploited colonial culture as the tactic for maintenance of power of colonial ruler belonging to Japanese culture. It was to say that culture transformation process utilized politically was seen with emphasis on culture standing modern civilization of Japanese empire in colony.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 序論
• 2. 『國民文學』의 좌담회
• 3. 좌담회에 나타난 식민지 문학의 역할
• 4. 좌담회에 나타난 제국 문명과 문화 변용
• 5. 結論
• ?考文?
• REFERENCES

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 사희영, "제국시대 잡지 국민문학과 한일 작가들" 도서출판 문 216-218, 2011

2 최호영, "월경의 아방가르드" 서울대학교출판문화원 41-, 2013

3 정진농, "오리엔탈리즘의 역사" 살림출판사 21-, 2003

4 주경철, "세상을 보는 눈"

5 케이트 그리언, "그람시·문화·인류학" 도서출판 길 65-66, 2004

6 川村湊, "異郷の昭和文学" 岩波書店 140-146, 1990

7 송민호, "日帝末期 國民文學 誌의 文學的 性格硏究" (32) : 1987

8 歷史學硏究會, "太平洋戰爭史 4" 靑木書店 249-250, 1972

9 신지영, "『국민문학』좌담회의 양가성과 발화게임" 민족문학사학회 (40) : 278-309, 2009

10 이원동, "『국민문학』의 좌담회 연구" 한국문학언어학회 (48) : 229-256, 2008

11 노상래, "『국민문학』 소재 한국작가의 일본어 소설 연구" 한민족어문학회 (44) : 353-412, 2004

12 김형섭, "『국민문학(國民文學)』의 서지 및 성격 고찰" 대한일어일문학회 (39) : 157-176, 2008

13 가미야 다다타카, "<식민지> 일본어 문학론" 문 39-, 2010

14 윤대석, "1940년대 '국민문학' 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2006