가족에 대한 법적ㆍ사회적 개념의 통합 필요성 = The need for an integration of legal and social concepts on family

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Family, which is the standard unit of human society, has maintained its tradition and solidarity around marriage and blood in these changes of human civilization. By the concept from the dictionary, a family is a group of kindred or closely related individuals and adults with responsibilities of care of children. Also, to an individual it is the first experience of a group as the very first regulator; it gives continuous effects to one’s life more than any other things and at the same time it secures the continuation of the society. Therefore, a family is social system of everything made through the family including relations by marriage, parents-children relationship, birth, motherhood, and division of labor by gender and although there are differences in the form and function it still is the one of the most generalized systems. However, as a system of society, there are variety of families which breaches over the extent of traditional definition of family due to the magnification of individualism and the concept of equality following the changes of social structure and social acceptance caused by the following reasons: upward tendency of age of marriage, increasing population of unmarried people, divorce and remarriage, decreasing number of childbirth, and the aging society. Single parent family, remarried family, Same-Sex family, multicultural family, cohabitation and/or ba helor household, teen household, grandparents and grandchildren household and boarding houses are what called as the ‘alternative family’. Generally, the concept of a family presumes the support, raising and living community. From the same context, these people are treated as abnormal families by law and from society even though they are families in reality. These varieties of families are no longer a personal matter caused by individual choice but a social problem. The problem of varying families can not be solved with laws those are established upon the standard of pre-existing families. Which means that traditional and conservative concept of family can not accept the ‘alternative family’ as general family because of the insufficiency of the social recognition and law and institutional inertia. Therefore, to change the recognition of varying families which coexist as members of community, unification of legal and social concepts of family is inevitable. By doing so, we can prepare the ground for legal acceptance of variety of families followed by embodiment of reasonable family policy and also induce the change of social recognition.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서
• Ⅱ. 실정법상의 가족
• Ⅲ. 사회적 관념으로서의 가족
• Ⅳ. 가족에 대한 법적ㆍ사회적 개념의 통합 필요성
• 《참고문헌》

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권영성, "헌법학원론(개정판)" 2007

2 장영수, "헌법학Ⅱ(기본권론)" 2003

3 강경근, "헌법(신판)" 2004

4 최갑선, "헌법 제36조 제1항에 의한 혼인과 가족생활의 보장" 14 : 2003

5 허영, "한국헌법론" 2007

6 전광석, "한국헌법론" 2005

7 전경옥, "한국여성정치사회사2" 2004

8 정광현, "한국가족법연구" 1967

9 최홍기, "한국가족 및 친족제도의 이해" 2006

10 배리쏘온, "페미니즘의 시각에서 본 가족" 1991

11 배경숙, "친족,상속법강의" 2006

12 엘리 자레스키, "자본주의와 가족제도" 1983

13 조은, "오늘의 한국가족 어디로 가고 있나" 아산사회복지재단 2006

14 박선영, "여성인권보장 및 차별해소를 위한 관련법 제정비연구―헌법상의 여성관련 조항 개정방안" 2007

15 조미영, "여성과 가족" 2005

16 "김영상, 새로운 가족관계등록제도, 대한변협신문"

17 변화순, "건강가정기본법에 대한 여성주의적 개정안" 2007

18 한국여성학회, "건강가정기본법논란과 여성학의 개입"

19 박민자, "가족의 의미: 가족가치와 규범을 중심으로" 덕성여자대학교 사회과학연구소 10 : 2004

20 이은정, "가족의 범위" 한국가족법학회 20 (20): 2006

21 미셀 바렛, "가족은 반사회적인가" 1994

22 조숙현, "가족에 관한 법률 정의 및 판례의 태도분석" 젠더법학회 2008

23 이재경, "가족법상의 가족개념과 여성학적 대안" 1995

24 법무부, "가족법개정특별위원회 회의록"

25 이경희, "가족법" 2006

26 박민자, "가족과 여성, 새로 쓰는 여성과 한국사회" 1999

27 실비아월비, "가부장제이론" 1996

28 윤진수, "傳統的 家族制度와 憲法― 최근의 憲法裁判所 判例를 중심으로 ―" 법학연구소 47 (47): 149-188, 2006

29 Peter Flora, "The development of Walfare States in Europe and America" 1982

30 한겨레, "3. 13/ 3. 19일자."