RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Effectiveness of Implicit/Explicit Learning in Advanced EFL Grammar Classes

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101825267

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Many previous studies have demonstrated that implicit instruction is more effective than explicit instruction when teaching difficult English structures to ESL/EFL learners. The present study aimed to examine the effectiveness, with 84 Korean advanced EFL students. Data were collected and analyzed through interviews and hypotheses testing (t-tests). The results showed that explicit learning could be as effective as implicit learning, with regard to both easy rules and difficult rules. According to the t-tests, the post-test score differences between two classes (explicit and implicit) were not statistically significant. In addition, around half of the participants showed the preference for implicit and explicit learning, respectively. However, interviews with eight students revealed that the advanced learners did not care whether easy grammar rules were taught explicitly or implicitly. As far as difficult rules were concerned, they wanted to be taught not implicitly or explicitly (deductively) but inductively, unlike low proficiency level learners in a previous study, most of whom wanted to learn difficult structures explicitly.
      번역하기

      Many previous studies have demonstrated that implicit instruction is more effective than explicit instruction when teaching difficult English structures to ESL/EFL learners. The present study aimed to examine the effectiveness, with 84 Korean advanced...

      Many previous studies have demonstrated that implicit instruction is more effective than explicit instruction when teaching difficult English structures to ESL/EFL learners. The present study aimed to examine the effectiveness, with 84 Korean advanced EFL students. Data were collected and analyzed through interviews and hypotheses testing (t-tests). The results showed that explicit learning could be as effective as implicit learning, with regard to both easy rules and difficult rules. According to the t-tests, the post-test score differences between two classes (explicit and implicit) were not statistically significant. In addition, around half of the participants showed the preference for implicit and explicit learning, respectively. However, interviews with eight students revealed that the advanced learners did not care whether easy grammar rules were taught explicitly or implicitly. As far as difficult rules were concerned, they wanted to be taught not implicitly or explicitly (deductively) but inductively, unlike low proficiency level learners in a previous study, most of whom wanted to learn difficult structures explicitly.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Long, M., "Training the Second Language Teacher as Classroom Researcher, In Applied Linguistics and the Preparation of Teachers: Toward the Rationale" Georgetown University Press 255-281, 1983

      2 Shen, H, "The Role of Explicit Instruction in ESL/EFL Reading" 36 : 424-433, 2003

      3 Krashen, S., "The Input Hypothesis and Its Rivals, In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages" Academic Press 45-77, 1994

      4 Brown, D., "Teaching by Principles" Pearson Education 2007

      5 Anderson, G., "Studying Your Own School: An Educator's Guide to Qualitative Practitioner Research" Corwin 1994

      6 Doughty, C, "Second Language Instruction Does Make a Difference: Evidence from an Empirical Study of SL Relativization" 13 : 431-469, 1991

      7 Schachter, J, "Second Language Classroom Research Issues and Opportunities" Lawrence Erlbaum 1996

      8 Ellis, R., "SLA Research and Language Teaching" Oxford 1997

      9 Ellis, N, "Rules and Instances in Foreign Language Learning: Interactions of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge" 5 : 289-318, 1993

      10 Brown, D., "Principles of Language Learning and Teaching" Pearson Education 2008

      1 Long, M., "Training the Second Language Teacher as Classroom Researcher, In Applied Linguistics and the Preparation of Teachers: Toward the Rationale" Georgetown University Press 255-281, 1983

      2 Shen, H, "The Role of Explicit Instruction in ESL/EFL Reading" 36 : 424-433, 2003

      3 Krashen, S., "The Input Hypothesis and Its Rivals, In Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages" Academic Press 45-77, 1994

      4 Brown, D., "Teaching by Principles" Pearson Education 2007

      5 Anderson, G., "Studying Your Own School: An Educator's Guide to Qualitative Practitioner Research" Corwin 1994

      6 Doughty, C, "Second Language Instruction Does Make a Difference: Evidence from an Empirical Study of SL Relativization" 13 : 431-469, 1991

      7 Schachter, J, "Second Language Classroom Research Issues and Opportunities" Lawrence Erlbaum 1996

      8 Ellis, R., "SLA Research and Language Teaching" Oxford 1997

      9 Ellis, N, "Rules and Instances in Foreign Language Learning: Interactions of Explicit and Implicit Knowledge" 5 : 289-318, 1993

      10 Brown, D., "Principles of Language Learning and Teaching" Pearson Education 2008

      11 Krashen, S., "Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition" Oxford 1982

      12 Paesani, K, "Literary Texts and Grammar Instruction: Revisiting the Inductive Presentation" 38 : 46-62, 2005

      13 DeKeyser, R, "Learning Second Language Grammar Rules: An Experiment with a Miniature Linguistic System" 17 : 379-410, 1995

      14 Gass, S, "Integrating Research Areas: A Framework for Second Language Studies" 9 : 198-217, 1988

      15 DeKeyser, R., "Implicit and Explicit Learning, In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition" Blackwell 313-348, 2003

      16 Reber, A., "Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge: an Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious" Oxford 1993

      17 Lightbown, P, "How Languages Are Learned" Oxford 2006

      18 Robinson, P, "Generalizability and Automaticity of Second Language Learning under Implicit, Incidental, Enhanced, and Instructed Conditions" 19 : 223-247, 1997

      19 Long, M, "Focus on Form: Theory, Research, and Practice, In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition" Cambridge 64-82, 1998

      20 Berk, L. M., "English Syntax: from Word to Discourse" Oxford 1999

      21 Stevenson, R., "Educational Practitioners' Use of Research, In Transforning Schools and Schools of Education" Corwin 99-122, 1998

      22 Robinson, P., "Consciousness, Rules, and Instructed Second Language Acquisition" Peter Lang Publishing 1996

      23 Horwitz, E., "Becoming a Language Teacher: A Practical Guide to Second Language Learning and Teaching" Pearson 2008

      24 Koch, A, "Affective Reactions of Foreign Language Students to Natural Approach Activities and Teaching Techniques, In Language Anxiety: From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications" Prentice Hall 109-126, 1991

      25 White, L, "Adverb Placement in Second Language Acquisition: Some Positive and Negative Evidence in the Classroom" 7 (7): 133-161, 1991

      26 장종득, "Action Research on Grammar Teaching" 언어과학회 48 (48): 235-251, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-04-24 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Linguistic Science Society KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.35 0.35 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.34 0.35 0.608 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼