Comparison of the reproducibility of results of a new peri-implantitis assessment system (implant success index) with the Misch classification

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objectives: The present study was conducted to determine the reproducibility of peri-implant tissue assessment using the new implant success index (ISI) in comparison with the Misch classification. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive study, 22 cases of peri-implant soft tissue with different conditions were selected, and color slides were prepared from them. The slides were shown to periodontists, maxillofacial surgeons, prosthodontists and general dentists, and these professionals were asked to score the images according to the Misch classification and ISI. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility scores of the viewers were assessed and reported using kappa and weighted kappa (WK) tests. Results: Inter-observer reproducibility of the ISI technique between the prosthodontists-periodontists (WK=0.85), prosthodontists-maxillofacial surgeons (WK=0.86) and periodontists-maxillofacial surgeons (WK=0.9) was better than that between general dentists and other specialists. In the two groups of general dentists and maxillofacial surgeons, ISI was more reproducible than the Misch classification system (WK=0.99 versus WK noncalculable, WK=1 and WK=0.86). The intra-observer reproducibility of both methods was equally excellent among periodontists (WK=1). For prosthodontists, the WK was not calculable via any of the methods. Conclusion: The intra-observer reproducibility of both the ISI and Misch classification techniques depends on the specialty and expertise of the clinician. Although ISI has more classes, it also has higher reproducibility than simpler classifications due to its ability to provide more detail.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. Introduction
• II. Materials and Methods
• III. Results
• IV. Discussion
• V. Conclusion

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Abrahamsson I, "The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog" 7 : 212-219, 1996

2 Jovanovic SA, "The management of peri-implant breakdown around functioning osseointegrated dental implants" 64 (64): 1176-1183, 1993

3 Murphy EA, "The logic of medicine" Johns Hopkins University Press 119-136, 1997

4 Mombelli A, "The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis" 17 : 63-76, 1998

5 Le Guéhennec L, "Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration" 23 : 844-854, 2007

6 Berglundh T, "Soft tissue reaction to de novo plaque formation on implants and teeth. An experimental study in the dog" 3 : 1-8, 1992

7 Tonetti MS, "Risk factors for osseodisintegration" 17 : 55-62, 1998

8 Offenbacher S, "Periodontal diseases: pathogenesis" 1 : 821-878, 1996

9 Roos-Jansåker AM, "Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of peri-implant lesions" 33 : 290-295, 2006

10 Rothman KJ, "Modern epidemiology" Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 307-308, 2008

11 Buser D, "Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants" 8 : 161-172, 1997

12 Ericsson I, "Long-standing plaque and gingivitis at implants and teeth in the dog" 3 : 99-103, 1992

13 Misch CE, "Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference" 17 : 5-15, 2008

14 Behneke A, "Hard and soft tissue reactions to ITI screw implants: 3-year longitudinal results of a prospective study" 12 : 749-757, 1997

15 Albandar JM, "Global risk factors and risk indicators for periodontal diseases" 29 : 177-206, 2002

16 Leonhardt A, "Five-year clinical, microbiological, and radiological outcome following treatment of peri-implantitis in man" 74 : 1415-1422, 2003

17 Kadkhodazadeh M, "Evaluation of peri-implant tissue health using a scoring system" 4 : 51-57, 2012

18 Zitzmann NU, "Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases" 35 (35): 286-291, 2008

19 Albrektsson T, "Consensus report: implant therapy" 365-369, 1994

20 Kadkhodazadeh M, "Comparison of the acceptability of a new scoring system with Misch's classification for dental implant success determination" 22 : 85-93, 2012

21 Brägger U, "Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function" 12 : 26-34, 2001

22 Astrand P, "Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions" 15 : 413-420, 2004

23 Nelson K, "A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years" 23 : 726-732, 2008

24 Davarpanah M, "A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data" 17 : 820-828, 2002