사법 : 재산권침해와 위자료의 기능 -일본의 판례와 논의를 중심으로- = The Infringement of Property Right and the Function of Consolation Money -Focusing on The Precedent and Debate in Japan-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In recent years, the consolation money has been discussed in various field such as unfair dismissal caused by the infringement of life or body, the sexual harrassment, the misuse of power, infringement of character like life disturbance, trust infringement, and the damage of property, etc. and also presented as various function such as restriction and complementary function as well as compensation function. Actually, the consolation money is widely accepted as ``damage`` in the name of consolation money in various case in the precedent. This trend plays a certain role in helping victim, on the other hand, it helped to make the judgement structure and function of consolation money obscure, and then it depends too much on the discretion of judge without legal review in assessing the amount of consolation money or admitting the consolation money. What is it to be protected through the consolation money in each case?, and what function is it to be expected?, these questions should be reviewed as prerequisites in admitting the consolation money. Therefore, the recent precedents of supreme court, the precedent to define the reason to consider consolation money over the airplane accident (Supreme Court, 24 Dec 2009, Sentence 2008Da3527), the precedent to restrict the complementary function of consolation money(Supreme Court, 23 Nov 1984, Sentence 84DaKa722) are so reasonable to restrict the method of assessing the consolation money which is comprehended without concrete review about the characteristic of consolation money in the name of consolation money although it is possible to confirm the property damage in the claim of consolation money caused by property damage. In addition, the function of consolation money should be comprehended through classifying character profit infringement type, attachment type, being raided and profitless type on the property damage. Firstly, for the character profit infringement, it is possible to admit the function of restriction through concrete example although it is originally the function of supplement in case the calmness of life was infringed, and also it would be possible to relief through the complementary function of consolation money in case the self determination is infringed. Secondly, for the attachment type, the function of restriction would be allowed in case it is not enough to solve through the function of supplement at first time. Finally, for the being raided and profitless type, the relief of victim should be fulfilled not through the supplement of damage, but through the function of restriction which reflect the imputation of the perpetrators.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤석찬, "책임원인에 따른 비재산적 손해에 대한 배상과 위자료" 한국민사법학회 (27) : 521-558, 2005

2 이창현, "채무불이행으로 인한 위자료에 관한 비교법적 연구" 한국법학원 (123) : 5-49, 2011

3 이덕환, "채무불이행과 위자료" 법학연구소 26 (26): 167-198, 2009

4 김형배, "채권총론" 박영사 1998

5 김용한, "채권법총론" 박영사 1983

6 이은영, "채권각론" 박영사 2001

7 이덕환, "채권각론" 율곡미디어 2010

8 윤철홍, "채권각론" 박영사 2001

9 곽윤직, "채권각론" 박영사 2001

10 김상용, "채권각론" 법문사 2003

11 서광민, "위자료에 관한 몇 가지 문제점" 2 : 2000

12 장재옥, "위자료에 관한 몇 가지 고찰, 이영준박사화갑기념, 한국민법이론의 발전"

13 서종희, "비재산적 손해배상(위자료)과 ‘정신적 고통’과의 관계 - 법인의 無形損害배상을 중심으로" 법학연구소 (51) : 298-328, 2011

14 송영민, "건축물의 하자와 도급인의 위자료청구권 - 일본 판례의 분석을 중심으로" 한국비교사법학회 14 (14): 607-636, 2007

15 牧野ゆき, "財産權侵害事例における慰藉料請求の可否" 50 (50): 2006

16 加藤一郞, "注釋民法(19): 植林弘" 有斐閣 1965

17 加藤雅信, "新民法大系Ⅴ 事務管理ㆍ不當利得ㆍ不法行爲(第2版)" 有斐閣 2005

18 後藤卷則, "損害賠償と制裁" 78 (78): 2006

19 樋口範雄, "制裁的慰藉料について－民刑峻別の｢理想｣と現實－" (911) : 1988

20 李在睦, "債務不履行에 있어서 慰藉料賠償의 許容範圍와 基準" 대한변호사협회 318 : 3-, 2003

21 我妻榮, "事務管理ㆍ不當利得ㆍ不法行爲[復刻版]" 日本評論社 1989

22 四宮和夫, "事務管理ㆍ不當利得ㆍ不法行爲(下)" 靑林書院 1985

23 森島昭夫, "不法行爲法講義" 有斐閣 1987

24 淡路剛久, "不法行爲法における權利保障と損害の評價" 有斐閣 1987

25 窪田充見, "不法行爲法と制裁, ｢民法學の課題と展望(石田喜久夫先生古稀記念)｣"

26 加藤一郞, "不法行爲(增補版)" 有斐閣 1974

27 澤井裕, "テキストブック事務管理ㆍ不當利得ㆍ不法行爲(第3版)" 有斐閣 2001