저작권법의 보호대상이 되지 않는 지적 성과물의 모방도용행위와 일반불법행위법리의 기능 = An imitative misappropriation act of the intellectual result thing of the property which does not become the protection object of the Copyright Act and the function of the general tort doctrine

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The competition is free in a principle in a market. When a market latecomer sells similar article which does not infringe intellectual property rights, as for competition-related to grow, it may be said that such a latecommer's behavior is an act in the free competition range between a preceding market leader, Even if we say that it is an imitation act.
Therefore, if we can evaluate such an imitation act of the market latecomer illegally. even if the preceding market leader does not depend on intellectual property rights, it follows that he may monopolize the sale in itself of the same kind article and that the possibility to obstruct development of the economy can occur.
However, it can be evaluated to be out of a range of the free competition when the latecomer has a free ride in the result that the market leader has invested expense, effort and time, and when the latecomer intends to give the damage to the preceding market leader intentionally in it and infringes his business intents with the legally protective value in significantly unfair means.
Concerning such an imitative misappropriation act, there is an necessity to relieve that preceding market leader to maintain market competitive system, and to contribute to market competition. But in such a situation, a collision of the value occurs and it needs a point of view of balancing of interests of the law.
In a concrete case, after all, we cannot but rely on the general tort doctrine by the method to take the remedy to protect the intellectual result thing that the market leader invest expense, effort and time, if the wrongful act of the market latecomer, for example dead copy, can not meet the requirement of a copyright infringement.
In this article, I would like to examine mainly on a copyright infringement case and try to consider whether the general tort doctrine is applied at a competition order maintenance point of view to protect the intellectual result thing that is not protected by the copyright in particular from that market latecomer's imitative misappropriation act.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 일반불법행위법리의 적용여부가 문제된 저작권 침해사례
• Ⅲ. 일본 판례들의 구체적 분석
• Ⅳ. 우리 판례상 저작권법영역에서의 불법행위법리의 경쟁질서유지기능
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권영준, "인터넷상 情報에 대한 接近 및 取得行爲의 違法性" 한국비교사법학회 14 (14): 241-298, 2007

2 양창수, "불법행위법의 변천과 가능성 —그 제도목적과 관련하여—" 박영사 3 : 1995

3 渋谷達紀, "財産的成果の模倣盜用行爲と判例理論" (1430) : 1992

4 早稻田祐美子, "著作権法による保護と周緣の法律による保護"

5 三浦正広, "著作権侵害と不法行爲法理の機能— 著作権の保護と競爭秩序の維持 in 現代社會と著作権法(斉藤博先生御退職記念論集)" 弘文堂 2008

6 渋谷達紀, "知的財産權法講義Ⅱ(著作權法․意匠法)" 有斐閣 2005

7 角田政芳, "知的財産權(第3版)" 有斐閣 2006

8 윤태영, "營業利益의 侵害와 違法性" 한국민사법학회 (30) : 75-119, 2005

9 牛木理一, "商品形態の保護と不正競爭防止法" 財團法人 經濟産業調査會 2004

10 加藤雅信, "事務管理․不當利得․不法行爲(第2版)" 有斐閣 2005

11 김성룡, "不法行爲의 要件으로서의 違法性의 役割" 한국민사법학회 (30) : 39-74, 2005

12 加藤一郞, "不法行爲(增補版)" 有斐閣 1974

13 石原修, "ニュース記事見出しの著作物性とその利用による不法行爲の成否 in 知的財産権硏究Ⅴ" 雄松堂出版 2008

14 東海林保, "デ-タベ-スの著作物性 in 新․裁判實務大系 22 著作權關係訴訟法" 靑林書院 2004

15 松村信夫, "インテリアデザイン in 意匠․デザインの法律相談" 靑林書院 2006