This paper aims to critically examine the instrumentalization of women as it appears in South Korea’s low fertility discourse, using The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood as an analytical framework. The Handmaid’s Tale portrays a dystopian soci...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110395558
2026
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
209-231(23쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper aims to critically examine the instrumentalization of women as it appears in South Korea’s low fertility discourse, using The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood as an analytical framework. The Handmaid’s Tale portrays a dystopian soci...
This paper aims to critically examine the instrumentalization of women as it appears in South Korea’s low fertility discourse, using The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood as an analytical framework. The Handmaid’s Tale portrays a dystopian society in which the state exerts control over women’s bodies and reduces them to instruments of reproduction in response to a crisis of declining birth rates. This study proceeds from the premise that such a narrative is not merely fictional but can be understood as an extreme manifestation of the politics of reproduction in contemporary society. To this end, the study first establishes the concepts of reproductive politics and biopolitics as its theoretical framework, and analyzes how the regime of Gilead in The Handmaid’s Tale controls and defines women’s bodies. It then examines South Korea’s low fertility discourse and related policies, exploring how the state and society generate structural pressures that compel women toward reproduction. In particular, this paper highlights that, although direct coercion is absent, South Korean society encourages and normalizes childbirth through economic, cultural, and policy-driven mechanisms. In conclusion, by comparing The Handmaid’s Tale with South Korean society, this study reveals a shared structure in which women’s bodies are objectified for national purposes, interpreting this phenomenon as a form of ‘soft control.’ Furthermore, it critiques the discourse that reduces women’s reproduction to a national obligation rather than an individual choice, and calls for the development of a more human-centered and ethically grounded social imagination.
고전 서사의 변용과 인문학적 변화 모델 연구: 장자와 이솝 우화의 비교 분석을 중심으로
비타 색빌웨스트의 모든 열정이 다하고와 버지니아 울프의 막간 속 여성주의적 환대의 이상
Imperial Mimicry and Racial Regression in Eugene O’Neill’s The Emperor Jones
검은 깃발 아래의 패싱: 이창래의 척 하는 삶에 나타난 멜랑콜리아, 죄의식, 윤리적 책임