한국의 베이비박스에 관한 비교법적 고찰 = A Comparative Study of Law on Baby Box in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The abandonment of baby is generally subject to legal penalties. Article 6 of the UN Rights Committee on the Child of Rights declares that ‘Contracting States shall ensure that all children have the right to life and that Contracting States shall guarantee the survival and development of children.’ But proper measure has not been made to the provider of baby boxes and the birth mother.
Many studies have attempted to resolve the problems, and amend laws related to the prenatal and postnatal care of baby and single mothers, and there is still little protection for them. The best way to cope with these worst-case situations is probably to find out what they need from the perspective of the women, who are pregnant and giving birth, and baby. In order to do this, it is necessary to prepare a program that allows safe counseling regardless of whether pregnant women are married or unmarried, women who can not give birth, and women who are raped.
In addition, women who do not receive formal national protection or legal protection should also be provided with measures to protect them. The Safe Haven Law in the US is mentioned in this paper, but it will take some time to consider whether this law could prove a viable alternative. While there are pros and cons of the Safe Haven Act, the United States, which introduces it, provides for child safety and wellbeing, safe place designation, anonymity, certain immunity, custody and adoption. Despite the problems presented by dissent, maintaining this system has, among other things, the purpose of protecting women and children.
In 2015, the UN Commission on the Rights of the Child, in its fourth quarterly report in the Netherlands, opposed the baby box. Its purpose is to protect human right of children, and in order to keep the meaning of this recommendation, better alternatives than current law will have to be sought.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 성정현, "한부모가족지원정책의 성평등 제고 방안에 대한 연구" 젠더법학연구소 10 (10): 77-108, 2018

2 김승권, "한부모가족정책의 실태와 정책제언" 한국보건사회연구원 2012

3 이용우, "한국사회 미혼모 지원정책의 패러다임 변화" 한국사회정책학회 24 (24): 97-115, 2017

4 안문희, "프랑스법의 익명출산제도 -2003년 2월 13일 유럽인권법원판결(ODIÈVRE c. FRANCE)과 관련하여-" 중앙법학회 15 (15): 213-234, 2013

5 권희정, "인권, 모성권, 아동복리 측면에서 본 비혼모를 둘러싼 쟁점들" 이화여자대학교 젠더법학연구소 2 (2): 2011

6 서종희, "익명출산제도에 관한 비교법적 고찰- 베이비박스를 둘러싼 논의를 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 27 (27): 89-137, 2014

7 엄주희, "영아의 생명권을 위한 규범적 고찰 - 베이비박스에 관한 영아유기 문제를 중심으로 -" 서울시립대학교 법학연구소 23 (23): 91-124, 2016

8 파이낸셜 뉴스, "영·유아 유기범죄 하루 한 명꼴 발생"

9 문은영, "서울시 한부모가족 생활실태 및 지원방안 연구" 서울시여성가족재단 2010

10 정혜원, "베이비박스의 논점과 대안 연구" 사회과학연구소 35 (35): 31-53, 2019

11 김상용, "베이비박스와 익명의 출산- 가족관계등록법의 개정과 관련하여 -" 법학연구소 54 (54): 315-341, 2013

12 이설아, "베이비박스와 영아유기에 대한 사회적 인식" 한국모자보건학회 23 (23): 13-22, 2019

13 한겨레 21, "베이비박스가 없는 나라’를 위해"

14 이선형, "베이비박스 아동 실태 및 돌봄지원 방안" 서울시 여성가족재단 2015

15 이미정, "미혼모의 자녀양육 의지와 현황" 이화여자대학교젠더법학연구소 2 (2): 2011

16 신옥주, "독일의 입법례를 중심으로 살펴본 제한적 익명출산제도의 도입 필요성에 관한 연구" 한양법학회 25 (25): 331-367, 2014

17 한정숙, "독일의 비밀출산서비스와 한국에 주는 시사점-비밀출산 서비스의 내용과 평가에 대한 고찰을 중심으로-" 한국콘텐츠학회 18 (18): 71-81, 2018

18 신동현, "독일에서의 베이비박스와 비밀출산법제" 한국비교사법학회 22 (22): 1865-1890, 2015

19 안경희, "독일법상 신뢰출산제도에 관한 소고" 젠더법학연구소 9 (9): 1-42, 2017

20 이정림, "건강한 출산육아를 위한 임산부등록제 추진 방안 연구" 제44회 한국모자보건학회 2018

21 한겨레신문, "‘베이비박스’ 아기들 알아서 처리하라…구청의 직무유기"

22 Diane S. Kaplan, "Who are the Mothers Who need Safe Haven Laws? An Empirical Investigation of Mothers who Kill, Abandon, or Safely Surrender Their Newborns" 29 : 447-, 2014

23 Susan L. Pollet, Esq, "Safe Haven Laws-Do Legal Havens to Abandon Babies Save Lives?" 32 : 71-, 2005

24 Lucinda J. Cornett, "Remembering the Endangered ‘Child’: Limiting the Definition of ‘Safe Haven’ and Looking Beyond the Safe Haven Law Framework" 98 : 833-, 2010

25 Brittany Neala, "Reforming the Safe Haven in Ohio: Protecting the Rights of Mothers Through Anonymity" 25 : 347-, 2012

26 Diane K. Donnelly, "Nebraska’s Youth Need Help--But Was a Safe Haven Law the Best Way?" 64 : 771-, 2010

27 Carol Sanger, "Infant Safe Haven Laws: Legislating in the Culture of Life" 106 : 753-, 2006

28 Debbe Magnusen, "From Dumpster to Delivery Room: Does Legalizing Baby Abandonment Really Solve the Problem" 22 : 1-, 2002

29 Dayna R. Cooper, "Father Are Parents Too: Chanllenging Safe Haven Laws With Procedural Due Process" 31 : 877-, 2003

30 Valentina Colcelli, "Anonymous Birth, Birth Registration and the Child’s Right to Know Their Origins in the Italian Legal System: a Short Comment" 1 : 101-, 2012