연암 박지원의 장소의 발견 = The Location Discovery by Yeon Am, Park, Ji Won

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis is to research for the meaning of space and location in classical literature, in terms of the theory of space and location in anthropogeography. Especially, it reveals, through Yeon Am, Park, Ji Won`s location experience, how space is to be localized by one man`s experience and what really means the location experience. Yeon Am looked at China with a point of view of an watcher. On the basis of it, this study focuses on three main spaces of representing his location experience, among spaces of diplomatic journey. The first space is Hwang Keum Dae. Hwang Keum Dae was a historical and ritual space of adoration by the nobles of Chosun Dynasty. However, for Yeon Am, it was just a location of criticizing the old dogmatism of Confucians of Chosun. He claimed and criticized the emptiness of Confucians that Hwang Keum Dae was just a ruined soil dummy, and the gold (Hwang Keum) sought by the nobles of Chosun was a symbol of revenge. The second is Liulichang of Peking. It was a space like market full of materialism and desire. Liulichang was considered as a Persian market for the travelers of Chosun. They were emotionally fascinated by the superficial aspects of Liulichang and intentionally turned away from it. However, Yeon Am felt lonely in the middle of Liulichang. His lonliness is a urban sensibility, a solitude among thong, an anonymity. The third is Ko Buk Ku, an unprecedented space. Ko Buk Ku was a place of revealing Yeon Am`s affection to the location. Ko Buk Ku, a physical space, became a personal location for Yeon Am, by making the marks on the wall of the castle. Only by Yeon Am, Ko Buk Ku became known to the people of Chosun, a meaningful `location` from the simple physical space. On the basis of this, this study reveals the meaning of location experience of Yeon Am. By his case, this study considers location experience in literature and the real meaning of location experience. Yeon Am`s spatial imagination and location experience is a kind of `rhizome`, freely spreading out unto each space of experience.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이승수, "？夜出古北口記？의 산문미 재론" 한국한문학회 (38) : 333-364, 2006

2 정민, "황금대기로 본 연암의 글쓰기 방식, In 고전문장론과 연암 박지원" 태학사 2010

3 박성순, "홍대용과 ‘實地’로서의 유리창－시장의 발견" 동아시아문화연구소 (50) : 155-186, 2011

4 신성환, "편혜영 소설에 나타난 장소상실과 그 의미 - 집, 일터, 길의 공간 구조 및 인문지리학적 인식을 중심으로 -" 한국문학언어학회 (55) : 353-391, 2011

5 이승수, "조선의 지식인들과 함께 문명의 연행길을 가다" 푸른역사 2005

6 에드워드 렐프, "장소와 장소 상실" 논형 2005

7 심경호, "일회성의 진실과 미학, In 한문산문의 내면풍경" 소명출판 2001

8 김태준, "왜 자리(장소)를 말하는가, In 로컬의 문화지형" 부산대한국민족문화연구소 2010

9 김혈조, "열하일기1" 도서출판 돌베개 2009

10 김경선, "연원직지. 국역연행록선집 Ⅺ" 1989

11 박지원, "연암집 상중하" 돌베개 2007

12 박지원, "연암 산문집" 지만지 2011

13 김도련, "야출고북구기의 함축미와 의경" 국민대학교 중국문제연구소 10 : 1994

14 이동환, "야출고북구기에 있어서의 연암의 자아" 한국한문학회 8 : 1985

15 이홍식, "북경 유리창의 표상과 문화사적 의미 －시사(市肆)를 중심으로－" 동아시아문화연구소 (50) : 249-277, 2011

16 박수밀, "북경 유리창(琉璃廠)과 지식인 교류의 세 층위" 한국언어문화학회 (43) : 51-80, 2010

17 김혈조, "박지원의 산문문학" 성균관대 대동문화연구원 2002

18 이현식, "박지원 산문의 논리와 미학" 이회문화사 2002

19 김명호, "박지원 문학 연구" 성균관대 대동문화연구원 2001

20 홍대용, "국역담헌서" 민족문화추진회 1974

21 이푸투안, "공간과 장소" 대윤 2011

22 마르쿠스 슈뢰르, "공간 장소 경계" 에코 리브르 2010

23 조규익, "燕行錄에 반영된 千山·？巫閭山·首陽山의 내재적 의미－燕行 路程 연구의 일환으로－" 한국어문교육연구회 33 (33): 153-179, 2004