RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      성취수준별 대표문항 분석을 통한 중학교 영어 성취수준 진술문 개발

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99793719

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims at developing valid and detailed descriptors of the Korean 9th graders achievement levels in the English section of the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA). This test is administered every year to all 9th graders to evaluate their achievement levels in four language skill areas, i.e, listening, reading, speaking, and writing, in relation to the National Curriculum of English. To develop valid and detailed level descriptors for each skill area, the following analyses were employed step by step. First, the items on the NAEA English tests from 2006 to 2009 were statistically analyzed, and based on the correct response probability criteria for being a level representative item, all the test items were classified into three categories, i.e., those that anchor at the advanced level, those that anchor at the proficient level, and those considered indicative of skills at the basic level. Next, all the items in each category were analyzed in relation to the achievement standards each item addresses. In this way, the NAEA achievement standards addressed by the NAEA items were classified into three categories, i.e., advanced level standards, proficient level standards, and basic level standards. Lastly, the achievement standards were simplified, combined, and integrated into more general descriptions for each achievement level group’s English proficiency. These detailed descriptors of each achievement level provide detailed information regarding what each proficiency group of Korean 9th graders know and can do in four language skill areas.
      번역하기

      This study aims at developing valid and detailed descriptors of the Korean 9th graders achievement levels in the English section of the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA). This test is administered every year to all 9th graders to ev...

      This study aims at developing valid and detailed descriptors of the Korean 9th graders achievement levels in the English section of the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(NAEA). This test is administered every year to all 9th graders to evaluate their achievement levels in four language skill areas, i.e, listening, reading, speaking, and writing, in relation to the National Curriculum of English. To develop valid and detailed level descriptors for each skill area, the following analyses were employed step by step. First, the items on the NAEA English tests from 2006 to 2009 were statistically analyzed, and based on the correct response probability criteria for being a level representative item, all the test items were classified into three categories, i.e., those that anchor at the advanced level, those that anchor at the proficient level, and those considered indicative of skills at the basic level. Next, all the items in each category were analyzed in relation to the achievement standards each item addresses. In this way, the NAEA achievement standards addressed by the NAEA items were classified into three categories, i.e., advanced level standards, proficient level standards, and basic level standards. Lastly, the achievement standards were simplified, combined, and integrated into more general descriptions for each achievement level group’s English proficiency. These detailed descriptors of each achievement level provide detailed information regarding what each proficiency group of Korean 9th graders know and can do in four language skill areas.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정은영, "국가수준 학업성취도평가의 교과별 평가 틀 개발 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2010

      2 Chalhoub-Deville, M, "The oral proficiency interview: a research agenda" 36 (36): 409-506, 2003

      3 Fulcher, G., "Testing Second Language Speaking" Pearson Longman 2003

      4 Gomez, P. G., "Proficiency descriptors based on a scal-anchoring study of the new TOEFL iBT reading test" 24 (24): 417-444, 2007

      5 Swender, E, "Oral proficiency testing in the real world: answers to frequently asked questions" 36 (36): 520-526, 2003

      6 Jaeger, R. M, "NAEP validity studies: Reporting the results of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, NCES. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S" 11 : 2003

      7 Bachman, L. F., "Language Testing in Practice" Oxford University Press 1996

      8 Brindley, G., "Describing language development? Rating scales and second language acquisition, In Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research" Cambridge University Press 112-140, 1998

      9 Fulcher, G., "Criteria for evaluating language quality. In E. Shohamy and N.H. Hornberger, eds., Encyclopedia of Language and Education" Springer 157-176, 2008

      10 Celce-Murcia, M., "Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications" 6 (6): 5-35, 1995

      1 정은영, "국가수준 학업성취도평가의 교과별 평가 틀 개발 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2010

      2 Chalhoub-Deville, M, "The oral proficiency interview: a research agenda" 36 (36): 409-506, 2003

      3 Fulcher, G., "Testing Second Language Speaking" Pearson Longman 2003

      4 Gomez, P. G., "Proficiency descriptors based on a scal-anchoring study of the new TOEFL iBT reading test" 24 (24): 417-444, 2007

      5 Swender, E, "Oral proficiency testing in the real world: answers to frequently asked questions" 36 (36): 520-526, 2003

      6 Jaeger, R. M, "NAEP validity studies: Reporting the results of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, NCES. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S" 11 : 2003

      7 Bachman, L. F., "Language Testing in Practice" Oxford University Press 1996

      8 Brindley, G., "Describing language development? Rating scales and second language acquisition, In Interfaces Between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research" Cambridge University Press 112-140, 1998

      9 Fulcher, G., "Criteria for evaluating language quality. In E. Shohamy and N.H. Hornberger, eds., Encyclopedia of Language and Education" Springer 157-176, 2008

      10 Celce-Murcia, M., "Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications" 6 (6): 5-35, 1995

      11 Council of Europe, "Common European Framework of Reference for Language Learning and Teaching" Cambridge University Press 2001

      12 Pawlikowska-Smith, G, "Canadian Language Benchmarks 2000: Theoretical Framework. Ottawa" Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks 2002

      13 이영주, "2011년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석 –영어" 한국교육과정평가원 2012

      14 김미경, "2010년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가 결과 분석–영어" 한국교육과정평가원 2011

      15 김미경, "2009년 국가수준 학업성취도 평가결과 분석–영어" 한국교육과정평가원 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-09-29 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Association for the Study of English Language and Linguistics KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-10-16 학술지명변경 한글명 : 영어학(Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics) -> 영어학 KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.65 0.65 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.53 0.5 1.12 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼