일본의 회사갱생절차상 해고 관련 판례 평석 = A Critical View on the Tokyo District Courts’ Judgement of Dismissal on the Corporate Reorganization Proceedings in Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In recent, the Tokyo District Court made a decision on the case of JAL’s laying- off(hereinafter called as “This Case”) where the reorganizing trustee of the company that applied for corporate reorganization proceedings laid off employees. This is the first case that brought controversy over the legitimacy of redundancy dismissal made by trustee based on reorganizing plan.
This may help us get the clear picture of redundancy dismissal case of SSangyong Motors on corporate reorganization proceedings in Korea. Followings are what Japanese academic field views on the This Case, and my own interpretation.
First, it is agreeable that laying-off is unavoidable in corporate reorganization proceedings. However, this doesn’t mean that all companies can freely lay off employees. They should consider the necessity of laying off and take various factors into account for the magnitude of layoff.
Second, massive severance pay can be an obstacle to corporate reorganization, or, it can be an infringement of creditor’s property rights. It may cause the rejection of reorganizing plan due to objections from the creditors.
Third, This Case implies that age and disease are reasonable standard for designating the workers who are to be laid off. However, age should be excluded to be the standard for it violates the constitutional rights of equality.
Fourth, we have to apply the flexible principle of interest balancing as there are time limits for reorganization proceedings.
Fifth, according to Corporate Reorganization Act, reorganizing plan has the same effect as the final ruling. Thus, when they lay off employees based on their regulation they made, it must be considered as final decision.
Considering the factors mentioned above, This Case can be seen as agreeable in general, but it must be invalid as it violates the constitutional rights of equality when they apply age as a standard for designating the workers who are to be laid off. Although laying off was inevitable for the company in reorganization proceedings, and agreeable because it was done based on the reorganizing plan which has the same effect as the final ruling, there must be some people who laid off and fell victims because the standard of designating the workers who are to be laid off is unconstitutional. Thus, This Case must be invalid as it violates the constitutional rights for humanlike life and work and equality.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성
• Ⅱ. 대상판결의 내용
• Ⅲ. 대상판결에 대한 일본 학계의 평가
• Ⅳ. 대상판결에 대한 필자의 견해
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 片岡昇, "勞動法(2)" 有斐閣 2009

2 吾妻光俊, "勞動法" 有斐閣 1966

3 最高裁判所事務總局行政局, "勞働關係民事裁判例槪觀(改訂版3)" 法曹會 2001

4 最高裁判所事務總局行政局, "勞働關係民事裁判例槪觀(上)" 法曹會 1987

5 最高裁判所事務總局行政局, "勞働關係民事裁判例槪觀(6)" 法曹會 1985

6 菅野和夫, "勞働法" 弘文堂 2002

7 淸正寬, "勞働法" 有斐閣 2002

8 淺井淸信, "勞働契約槪念を規定するもの" 日本勞働法學會 (42) : 1973

9 下井隆史, "勞働基準法" 有斐閣 2007

10 박승두, "회생절차 진행기업 노동자의 해고요건" 한국노동법학회 (29) : 131-167, 2009

11 서울중앙지방법원 파산부 실무연구회, "회생사건실무(상)(하)" 박영사 2013

12 박승두, "회사정리절차의 한․일 비교 연구" 한국산업은행 2001

13 서울지방법원, "회사정리실무(개정판)" 서울지방법원 2001

14 서경환, "회사정리법․화의법상의 제문제" 법원도서관 2000

15 임채홍, "회사정리법(상)(하)" 한국사법행정학회 2002

16 박승두, "회사정리법" 법률SOS 2000

17 박승두, "해고제도의 일원화론" 한국노동법학회 (30) : 33-66, 2009

18 박승두, "통합도산법분석" 법률SOS 2005

19 박승두, "통합도산법" 법문사 2006

20 박승두, "채무자회생법과 노동법의 관계" 한국노동법학회 (35) : 193-229, 2010

21 박승두, "일본의 회사갱생절차 진행 기업 노동자의 해고요건" 한국비교노동법학회 31 : 103-140, 2014

22 박승두, "일본 회사갱생법의 기본구조 및 최근 개정내용에 관한 연구" 한국산업은행 (575) : 2003

23 박승두, "일본 민사재생법의 이념과 기본구조" 청주대학교 법학연구소 32 (32): 2010

24 김영주, "도산절차상 미이행 쌍무계약에 관한 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2013

25 박승두, "도산법총론" 법률SOS 2002

26 박승두, "기업회생절차의 진행단계별 쟁점에 관한 연구" 한국경영법률학회 22 (22): 175-215, 2011

27 박승두, "韓國における倒産企業勞働者の賃金請求權に關する硏究" 日本比較法硏究所 37 (37): 2003

28 吉野正三郞, "集中講義 破産法" 成文堂 1996

29 服部 明人, "詳說倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

30 倒産と勞働｣實務硏究會, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

31 飯塚 孝德, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

32 森倫洋, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

33 松村 卓治, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

34 池田悠, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

35 荒木尙志, "詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

36 齊藤秀夫, "註解破産法(上)(下)" 靑林書院 1999

37 川口美貴, "解雇法理の展開(下)/經營上の理由による解雇-山田紡績事件における判斷法理の意義と課題" (217) : 2007

38 宗田親彦, "破産法槪說" 慶應義塾大學出版會 2001

39 渡邊鋼吉, "破産法學" 成文堂 1999

40 宮川知法, "破産法" 信山社 1999

41 吉野正二郞, "破産法" 成文堂 1996

42 林屋禮二, "破産法" 靑林書院 1993

43 加藤哲夫, "破産法" 弘文堂 2006

44 伊藤眞, "破産法" 有斐閣 2002

45 林屋禮二, "破産法" 靑林書院 1993

46 高木新二郞, "破産ㆍ和議の基礎知識" 靑林書院 1998

47 森倫洋, "田原睦夫先生古稀ㆍ最高裁判事退官記念論文集:現代民事法の實務と理論(下)" 金融財政事情硏究會 2013

48 角田邦重, "現代雇用法" 法律文化社 2007

49 船尾徹, "特集/JAL整理解雇事件控訴審でのたたかいから: 更生計劃と整理解雇の有效性判斷との關係についての基本的檢討" 旬報社 (1802) : 25-, 2013

50 根本到, "特集/JAL整理解雇事件控訴審でのたたかいから: 會社更生手續下の整理解雇の有效性判斷-東京高等裁判所宛意見書" 旬報社 (1802) : 25-, 2013

51 淸水直, "特集/JAL整理解雇事件控訴審でのたたかいから: 會社更生手續における人員整理のあり方-東京高等裁判所宛意見書" 旬報社 (1802) : 25-, 2013

52 東京大學勞働法硏究會, "注釋勞働基準法, (上)" 有斐閣 2003

53 麻上正信, "注解和議法" 靑林書院 1993

54 宮脇幸彦, "注解 會社更生法" 靑林書院 1986

55 倒産と勞働｣實務硏究會, "槪說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2012

56 兼子一, "條解會社更生法(中)" 弘文堂 1999

57 兼子一, "條解會社更生法(下)" 弘文堂 1998

58 兼子一, "條解會社更生法(上)(中)(下)" 弘文堂 2001

59 兼子一, "條解會社更生法(上)" 弘文堂 1998

60 小屋敏一, "會社更生法(上)(中Ⅰ)(中Ⅱ)(下)" 中央大學出版部 1978

61 伊藤眞, "會社更生法" 有斐閣 2012

62 松田二郞, "會社更生法" 有斐閣 1997

63 森井利和, "會社倒産と勞働賃金債權確保の實務" (782) : 2000

64 戶谷義治, "會社倒産と解雇" 總合勞働硏究所 (224) : 2009

65 松本哲泓, "新裁判實務大系(16):勞働關係訴訟法(1)" 靑林書院 2001

66 角田邦重, "新現代勞働法入門" 法律文化社 2006

67 小西國友, "新實務民事訴訟講座(13)" 日本評論社 1981

68 中町誠, "整理解雇法理は實務上確立しているか" 總合勞働硏究所 (196) : 2001

69 鵜飼良昭, "整理解雇法理の現狀と實務上の課題" 總合勞働硏究所 (196) : 2001

70 高橋賢司, "平成 24年度 重要判例解說" 2013

71 竹下守夫, "大コンメンタ-ル破産法" 靑林書院 2008

72 木村雅彦, "基礎講義 破産法" 靑林書院 1998

73 梅本吉彦, "別冊ジュリスト:倒産判例百選" 有斐閣 2002

74 山川隆一, "別冊ジュリスト:倒産判例百選" 有斐閣 2002

75 上江洲 純子, "再建型倒産手續と整理解雇法理(2)" 經應義塾大學大學院法務硏究科 (28) : 2014

76 上江洲 純子, "再建型倒産手續と整理解雇法理(1)" 經應義塾大學大學院法務硏究科 (26) : 2013

77 朴承斗, "倒産節次의 進行이 勤勞關係에 미치는 影響" 대한변호사협회 322 (322): 3-, 2003

78 今中利昭, "倒産法講義" 民事法硏究會 2004

79 高木新二郞, "倒産法の改正と運用" 商事法務硏究會 2000

80 竹內康二, "倒産判例ガイド" 有斐閣 1999

81 高井 章光, "倒産と勞働｣實務硏究會, 詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

82 德住 堅治, "倒産と勞働｣實務硏究會, 詳說 倒産と勞働" 商事法務 2013

83 長谷川 聰, "企業讓渡におけるイギリスの勞働者保護制度" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008

84 中島弘雅, "企業倒産に伴う勞働法上の問題点" 慶應義塾大學法學部內 法學硏究會 83 (83): 2010

85 細川良, "企業倒産における整理解雇-日本航空(整理解雇)事件が示す課題" 總合勞働硏究所 (239) : 2012

86 高木新二郞, "ヨ-ロッパ連合倒産條約の解說と飜譯〔解說篇〕" 23 (23): 1995

87 細川良, "フランスにおける倒産法制の變容と勞働法" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008

88 高橋賢司, "ドイツ法における事業承繼と企業再編法" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008

89 木川裕一郞, "ドイツ倒産法硏究序說" 成文堂 1999

90 高木新二郞, "アメリカ連邦倒産法" 商事法務硏究會 1996

91 沼田雅之, "アメリカ企業の經營上の決定と被傭者の保護" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008

92 門伝明子, "JAL整理解雇判決(東京地裁 平成24.3.29運航乘務員,同24.3.30客室乘務員) -再建型倒産手續における整理解雇法理の適用關係および人員削減の必要性を中心に" (976) : 2012

93 高木新二郞, "IBA 國際倒産協定" 25 (25): 1997

94 水野圭子, "EUにおける企業組織變動" 總合勞働硏究所 (222) : 2008

95 産勞總合硏究所, "2007年度 重要勞働判例總覽"