The on-going missional church conversation in North America has been rooted in Newbigin’s trinitarian missiology under the strong influence of Barth’s Trinity. In particular, Barth’s Trinity, with its emphasis on God’s sovereignty, has brought...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100495814
2014
English
230
KCI등재
학술저널
221-247(27쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The on-going missional church conversation in North America has been rooted in Newbigin’s trinitarian missiology under the strong influence of Barth’s Trinity. In particular, Barth’s Trinity, with its emphasis on God’s sovereignty, has brought...
The on-going missional church conversation in North America has been rooted in Newbigin’s trinitarian missiology under the strong influence of Barth’s Trinity. In particular, Barth’s Trinity, with its emphasis on God’s sovereignty, has brought a new understanding of mission in which God, rather than the Church, is regarded as the subject of mission. One the one hand, the missional church conversation has helped the Church participate in God’s mission in the world. One the other hand, it has paid little attention to the suffering in the world, despite its emphasis on the world. It has not focused on the fact that Newbigin partly addressed suffering in terms of trinitarian mission. In Moltmann’s view, the missional church conversation seemingly has little to do with suffering in relation to the Trinity. In contrast, Moltmann develops an open social Trinity focusing on mutual and reciprocal relationships of the three divine persons, which are open to humanity and the world. Moltmann is concerned with the suffering of both God and humanity in trinitarian terms.
This article primarily explores Moltmann’s open social Trinity in order to enrich the missional church conversation toward getting involved with the suffering of the world. The discussion starts by briefly by exploring the legacies of both Barth’s Trinity and Newbigin’s trinitarian missiology in relation to the missional church conversation. This is followed by Moltmann’s understandings of the Trinity and suffering, dealing with the following subtopics: an open social Trinity, perichoresis as the basis of Moltmann’s Trinity, an eschatological understanding of history, the triune God as a suffering God, and love and suffering. After critical engagement with Moltmann’s Trinity, this article proposes missional implications for the Korean Church and the North American Church. Moltmann’s Trinity may help the missional church conversation deal with suffering in the world in terms of the trinitarian mission.
목차 (Table of Contents)
Ist Die Stadt Ein Ort Der Hoffnung?
Paul's Adam Christology in the Post-New Perspective Reading
Paul as a Role Model in the Third Conversion Story