플립드러닝이 의대생의 학습접근방식에 미치는 영향 = Effects of flipped learning on approaches to learning of medical students

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구에서는 최근 많은 주목을 받고 있는 학습자중심 교수학습방법인 플립드러닝이 의대생의 학습접근방식(approaches to learning)에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 살펴보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 학습자 중심 학습형태로서의 플립드러닝의 특성이 잘 드러나도록 Kim et al.(2014)이 제안한 학습자중심 플립 드러닝 설계원리에 따라 플립드러닝을 설계하여, 플립드러닝 전후로 R-LPQ-2F(수정된 2요인 학습과 정설문지)를 활용하여, 의대생들이 플립드러닝에서 어떤 학습접근방식을 취하는지를 살펴보았다. 또한, 처음 플립드러닝 활동에 참여한 의대생의 플립드러닝에 대한 인식조사를 위해 설문조사와 플립 드러닝 전후로 강의평가를 실시하였다. 본 연구에 참여한 피험자는 한 의과대학에서 인체와 미생물의 상호작용을 수강한 의예과 1학년 학생 34명이었고, 플립드러닝은 4차시 동안 진행되었다. 플립드 러닝이 학습자의 심층적 학습접근방식 채택을 유도할 것으로 기대되었지만, 연구결과에 의하면 학습 자의 심층적 학습접근방식 채택이 증가하였으나 유의한 수준에는 미치지 못하였다. 그러나 심층적 학습접근방식의 하위요인인 심층적 동기요인이 유의하게 증가하여, 플립드러닝이 학습자의 내재적 동기와 몰두를 유발하는 것으로 판단된다. 플립드러닝에 대한 인식조사에서는 학습자들이 플립드러 닝의 상호작용적 학습활동을, 플립드러닝이 학습향상에 미친 영향보다 더 긍정적인 것으로 평가하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 강의평가에서도 전통적인 강의식 수업보다는 플립드러닝을 보다 긍정적으로 평가한 것으로 나타났지만, 플립드러닝을 또 다시 수강하고 싶으냐는 질문에는 강의식 수업에 대한 선호도를 드러냈다. 플립들 러닝 실시 후 심층적 학습접근방식이 증가하지 않은 이유는 상대적으로 짧은 플립드러닝 학습경험, 교수중심의 교수방법에 대한 선호도 등으로 설명될 수 있을 것 같으며, 이와 관련한 후속연구가 필요한 것으로 생각된다. 본 연구의 결과는 플립드러닝에 대한 보다 다각적인 이해를 촉진하며 플립드러닝이 효과적인 대학교육의 대안이 될 수 있는지를 판단하는 데 중요한 정보를 제공해 주는 것으로 생각된다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The flipped learning approaches had drawn much attention from the research and practices communities. Despite this attention, how students learn in the flipped learning has been minimally explored. Focusing on this gap, this study investigated students’ approach to learning in flipped learning. Students’ perception for this learning method was also scrutinized. For this purpose, the student-centered flipped learning was designed according to the nine design principles suggested by Kim et al. (2014). 34 premedical students enrolled in the interaction of human body and microorganism course participated in this study and the flipped learning was executed once a week for four weeks. To collect data, surveys for students’ perception on the flipped learning were conducted after the flipped learning and R-LPQ-2F to investigate approaches to learning and a course evaluation were also conducted before and after the flipped learning. Because students in student-centered flipped learning are required to learn by actively constructing new knowledge, it was expected that the medical students adopted deep approaches to learning. However, according to the results, there were no significant differences before and after the flipped learning in terms of students’ approaches to learning. The deep motivation, a sub-factor of the deep approach to learning, however, showed a significant increase, so it is thought that the flipped learning aroused intrinsic motivation and commitment to work. In addition, students recognized more highly interactive learning activities of the flipped learning than learning improvement in the flipped learning. They were also, in general, more satisfied with the flipped learning than the traditional teacher-oriented learning according to the course evaluation, but they showed significant higher preference toward the teacher-oriented learning than the flipped learning. The explanations for reasons why deep approaches to learning did not increase during the flipped learning were discussed.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
• Ⅲ. 연구방법
• Ⅳ. 연구결과
• Ⅴ. 논 의

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이지연, "학습자 중심 플립드러닝(Flipped Learning) 수업의 적용 사례" 한국교육공학회 30 (30): 163-191, 2014

2 이희숙, "플립러닝의 학습효과 관련 요인 간의 구조적 관계 분석" 한국컴퓨터교육학회 19 (19): 87-100, 2016

3 서미옥, "플립드 러닝의 효과성에 대한 메타분석" 한국교육공학회 32 (32): 707-741, 2016

4 이동엽, "플립드 러닝(Flipped Learning) 교수학습 설계모형 탐구" 한국디지털정책학회 11 (11): 83-92, 2013

5 임경화, "실천공학 교수법 : 공학전공수업에서 플립드러닝(Flipped Learning)적용을 위한설계모형 탐색" 6 (6): 77-84, 2014

6 김남익, "대학에서의 거꾸로 학습(Flipped learning) 사례 설계 및 효과성 연구: 학습동기와 자아효능감을 중심으로" 한국교육공학회 30 (30): 467-492, 2014

7 한형종, "대학 역전학습 온·오프라인 연계 설계전략에 관한 연구" 한국교육공학회 31 (31): 1-38, 2015

8 Pierce, R., "Vodcasts and active-learning exercises in a"flipped classroom"model of a renal pharmacotherapy module" 76 (76): 1-5, 2012

9 Baeten, M., "Using student-centered learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning : Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness" 5 (5): 243-260, 2010

10 Socha, A., "Using multidimensional scaling to improve functionality of the revised learning process questionnaire" 37 (37): 409-425, 2012

11 Schmitt, N., "Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha" 8 (8): 350-353, 1996

12 Land, S. M., "Theoretical foundations of learning environments" Routledge 3-25, 2012

13 O'Flaherty, J., "The use of flipped classrooms in higher education : A scoping review" 25 : 85-95, 2015

14 Biggs, J., "The revised two-factor study process questionnaire : R-SPQ-2F" 71 (71): 133-149, 2001

15 McLaughlin, J. E., "The flipped classroom : A course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school" 89 (89): 236-243, 2014

16 Kim, M. K., "The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university : An exploration of design principles" 22 : 37-50, 2014

17 Marton, F., "The experience of learning" Scottish Academic Press 39-58, 1997

18 Kyndt, E., "The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students' approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity" 30 (30): 135-150, 2011

19 Biggs, J. B., "Study process questionnaire manual. Student approaches to learning and studying" Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd., Radford House 1987

20 Baeten, M., "Student-centered learning environments : An investigation into student teachers’ instructional preferences and approaches to learning" 19 (19): 43-62, 2016

21 Hannafin, M. J., "Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia : Status, Issues, and Implications" 68 (68): 94-99, 1997

22 Khanova, J., "Student experiences across multiple flipped courses in a single curriculum" 49 (49): 1038-1048, 2015

23 Chamorro-Premuzic, T., "Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance" 44 (44): 1596-1603, 2008

24 Shea, P., "Learning presence : Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments" 55 (55): 1721-1731, 2010

25 Chin, C., "Learning in science : A comparison of deep and surface approaches" 37 (37): 109-138, 2000

26 Herrmann, K. J., "Investigating the relationships between approaches to learning, learner identities and academic achievement in higher education" 1-16, 2016

27 Strayer, J. F., "How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation" 15 (15): 171-193, 2012

28 Al-Zahrani, A. M., "From passive to active : the impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students' creative thinking" 46 (46): 1133-1148, 2015

29 Davies, R. S., "Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course" 61 (61): 563-580, 2013

30 Van Vliet, E. A., "Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist" 14 (14): 1-10, 2015

31 Toqeer, R., "Flipped classroom concept application to management and leadership course for maximizing the learning opportunities" 3 (3): 137-144, 2013

32 Bergmann, J., "Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day" International Society for Technology in Education 2012

33 Kember, D., "Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire" 74 (74): 261-279, 2004

34 Baeten, M., "Enhancing students’ approaches to learning : The added value of gradually implementing case-based learning" 28 (28): 315-336, 2013

35 Gilboy, M. B., "Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom" 47 (47): 109-114, 2015

36 Kong, S. C., "Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms : An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy" 78 : 160-173, 2014

37 Garrison, D. R., "Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education" 15 (15): 7-23, 2001

38 Gijbels, D., "Constructivist learning environments and the (im) possibility to change students’ perceptions of assessment demands and approaches to learning" 36 (36): 431-, 2008

39 Mason, G. S., "Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course" 56 (56): 430-435, 2013

40 Zeegers, P., "Approaches to learning in science : A longitudinal study" 71 (71): 115-132, 2001

41 Mattick, K., "Approaches to learning and studying in medical students : Validation of a revised inventory and its relation to student characteristics and performance" 38 (38): 535-543, 2004

42 Heeseung Choi, "Applying the Flipped Learning Model to an English-Medium Nursing Course" 한국간호과학회 45 (45): 939-948, 2015

43 Jeffries, W. B., "An introduction to medical teaching" Springer 41-55, 2014