RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      일제하 대만 경찰력의 재검토 ― 번지 경찰력과 평지 경찰력의 통합적 이해 ― = Reconsidering Police Capacity in Colonial Taiwan — A Comprehensive Understanding of Police Capacity of General Administration Area and Special Administration Area —

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      I would like to put some new findings together according to what we had analyzed in this article. First, parapolice manpower system, originated from colonial Taiwan’s dualistic ruling system, was operated on a large scale, which which explains we cannot ignore the importance of parapolice manpower. But they were not equivalent to regular police officer in terms of rank, wage and duty, so if we want to measure the total police force of colonial Taiwan, we have to convert parapolice manpower into regular police manpower. I concluded that two parapolice manpower is approximately equal to one regular police manpower.
      Second, I reexaminated the scale of police manpower on the basis of the conversion above, and found that police manpower allocated on aborigine land accounted for 25% to 39% of the total police manpower, which explains that Government-General of Taiwan invested enormous human and material resources in order to govern securely aborigine land. But the relations between police manpower on aborigine land(= special administration area) and police manpower on general administration area was not the kind of zero sum. The police manpower on both areas increased simultaneously, and it implies that we cannot fully explain the superiority of colonial Taiwan’s police manpower compared with other regions within Japanese empire was derived from Taiwan’s regional characteristics like presence of aborigine land and aborigines.
      Anyway, the total police manpower of colonial Taiwan was far stronger than ant other parts of Japanese empire. It is confirmed in terms of population per police manpower and area per police station, especially compared with colonial Korea, the superiority of colonial Taiwan’s police manpower is striking.
      On the other hand, ethnic composition of police manpower in colonial Taiwan was no different from that of colonial Korea, not like previous researches have emphasized. Taiwanese police manpower ranged from 30 % to 46% of total police manpower of colonial Taiwan, and Korean police manpower ranged from 37 % to 44% of total police manpower of colonial Korea, which implies we rather see similarity than difference in terms of ethnic composition of police manpower. In the case of colonial Taiwan, the possible tension between police manpower demand and financial pressure was able to be resolved by applying ethnically hierarchic structure(Japanese–Taiwanese-Aboriginal) to police manpower allocation.
      번역하기

      I would like to put some new findings together according to what we had analyzed in this article. First, parapolice manpower system, originated from colonial Taiwan’s dualistic ruling system, was operated on a large scale, which which explains we ca...

      I would like to put some new findings together according to what we had analyzed in this article. First, parapolice manpower system, originated from colonial Taiwan’s dualistic ruling system, was operated on a large scale, which which explains we cannot ignore the importance of parapolice manpower. But they were not equivalent to regular police officer in terms of rank, wage and duty, so if we want to measure the total police force of colonial Taiwan, we have to convert parapolice manpower into regular police manpower. I concluded that two parapolice manpower is approximately equal to one regular police manpower.
      Second, I reexaminated the scale of police manpower on the basis of the conversion above, and found that police manpower allocated on aborigine land accounted for 25% to 39% of the total police manpower, which explains that Government-General of Taiwan invested enormous human and material resources in order to govern securely aborigine land. But the relations between police manpower on aborigine land(= special administration area) and police manpower on general administration area was not the kind of zero sum. The police manpower on both areas increased simultaneously, and it implies that we cannot fully explain the superiority of colonial Taiwan’s police manpower compared with other regions within Japanese empire was derived from Taiwan’s regional characteristics like presence of aborigine land and aborigines.
      Anyway, the total police manpower of colonial Taiwan was far stronger than ant other parts of Japanese empire. It is confirmed in terms of population per police manpower and area per police station, especially compared with colonial Korea, the superiority of colonial Taiwan’s police manpower is striking.
      On the other hand, ethnic composition of police manpower in colonial Taiwan was no different from that of colonial Korea, not like previous researches have emphasized. Taiwanese police manpower ranged from 30 % to 46% of total police manpower of colonial Taiwan, and Korean police manpower ranged from 37 % to 44% of total police manpower of colonial Korea, which implies we rather see similarity than difference in terms of ethnic composition of police manpower. In the case of colonial Taiwan, the possible tension between police manpower demand and financial pressure was able to be resolved by applying ethnically hierarchic structure(Japanese–Taiwanese-Aboriginal) to police manpower allocation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 문명기, "청말 대만 건성과 유명전 : 재정확보 방안을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2007

      2 문명기, "일제하 대만・조선 기층행정 운영의 비교분석 ― 행정인력의 수량적 검토를 중심으로 ―" 동양사학회 (150) : 377-431, 2020

      3 문명기, "일제하 대만⋅조선총독부의 세출구조 비교분석" 한국학연구소 44 : 409-454, 2015

      4 문명기, "일제하 대만 保甲制度의 재정적 효과, 1903~1938" 중국근현대사학회 (75) : 27-72, 2017

      5 문명기, "일제하 臺灣 蕃地 통치체제의 형성과 전개― 蕃地 경찰조직의 설치와 운영을 중심으로" 대동문화연구원 (118) : 409-443, 2022

      6 문명기, "대만・조선의 ‘식민지근대’의 격차 – 경찰 부문의 비교를 통하여" 중국근현대사학회 (59) : 69-100, 2013

      7 小島麗逸, "臺灣霧社蜂起事件 硏究と資料" 社會思想社 1981

      8 臺灣總督府 警務局, "臺灣總督府警察統計書"

      9 臺灣總督府 警務局, "臺灣總督府警察沿革誌(제1편)" 1935

      10 臺灣總督府, "臺灣總督府統計書"

      1 문명기, "청말 대만 건성과 유명전 : 재정확보 방안을 중심으로" 서울대학교 대학원 2007

      2 문명기, "일제하 대만・조선 기층행정 운영의 비교분석 ― 행정인력의 수량적 검토를 중심으로 ―" 동양사학회 (150) : 377-431, 2020

      3 문명기, "일제하 대만⋅조선총독부의 세출구조 비교분석" 한국학연구소 44 : 409-454, 2015

      4 문명기, "일제하 대만 保甲制度의 재정적 효과, 1903~1938" 중국근현대사학회 (75) : 27-72, 2017

      5 문명기, "일제하 臺灣 蕃地 통치체제의 형성과 전개― 蕃地 경찰조직의 설치와 운영을 중심으로" 대동문화연구원 (118) : 409-443, 2022

      6 문명기, "대만・조선의 ‘식민지근대’의 격차 – 경찰 부문의 비교를 통하여" 중국근현대사학회 (59) : 69-100, 2013

      7 小島麗逸, "臺灣霧社蜂起事件 硏究と資料" 社會思想社 1981

      8 臺灣總督府 警務局, "臺灣總督府警察統計書"

      9 臺灣總督府 警務局, "臺灣總督府警察沿革誌(제1편)" 1935

      10 臺灣總督府, "臺灣總督府統計書"

      11 總督官房 統計課, "臺灣統計摘要(第九)"

      12 臺灣省行政長官公署統計室, "臺灣省五十一年來統計提要"

      13 臺灣總督府, "臺灣現勢要覽" 1924

      14 石丸雅邦, "臺灣日本時代的理蕃警察" 國立政治大學 2008

      15 臺灣總督府 警察官及司獄官練習所, "臺灣地方警察實務要論"

      16 臺灣總督府 警務局, "臺灣の警察"

      17 柯志明, "番頭家 - 淸代臺灣族群政治與熟番地權" 中央硏究院 社會學硏究所 2001

      18 臺灣總督府 警務局, "理蕃誌稿(第3編)"

      19 臺灣總督府 警務局, "理蕃誌稿(第1·2編)" 1918

      20 臺灣總督府 警務局, "理蕃誌稿" 1938

      21 大津麟平, "理蕃策原議" 자가출판 1914

      22 石垣直, "現代臺灣の多文化主義と先住權の行方 - ‘原住民族’による土地をめぐる權利回復運動の事例から" 9 : 2007

      23 蔡明志, "植民地警察之眼 - 臺灣日治時期的地方警察社會控制與空間改正之論述" 國立成功大學 2008

      24 臺灣總督府 警務局, "昭和15年度臺灣總督府警察關係各目明細書"

      25 鄭安睎, "日治時期蕃地隘勇線的推進與變遷, 1895~1920" 國立政治大學 2011

      26 松田利彦, "日本植民地研究の論点" 岩波書店 2018

      27 菊池一隆, "日本の理蕃政策と臺灣原住民 - 戰時期を中心に" 28 : 2013

      28 林一宏, "從隘勇線到駐在所 - 日治時期李崠山地區理蕃設施之變遷" 14 (14): 2007

      29 李文良, "岩波講座)東アジア近現代通史(第3卷)" 岩波書店 2010

      30 문명기, "保甲의 동아시아- 20세기 전반 대만 · 만주국 · 중국의 기층행정조직 재편과 그 의미" 중앙사학연구소 (47) : 93-154, 2018

      31 "<蕃地警察職務規程施行細則>(新竹廳訓令 제29호, 1907년)(國史館臺灣文獻館文獻檔案查詢系統 - 典藏號:00001287148)"

      32 近藤正己, "(岩波講座) 近代日本と植民地 第2卷: 帝國統治の構造" 岩波書店 1992

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.63 1.63 1.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.22 1.08 1.624 0.46
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼