RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      SCIE SCOPUS

      Multi-scale smart management of integrated energy systems, Part 1: Energy, economic, environmental, exergy, risk (4ER) and water-exergy nexus analyses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107443679

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      <P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>A holistic analytical approach is proposed to study the performance of fossil fuel burning integrated energy conversion systems considering energetic, economic, exergetic, environmental and risk (4ER) aspects in a framework. For this, life cycle assessment is conducted to study environmental impacts while other analyses are performed using the algebraic thermo-mathematical programming. The hazardous risks are also investigated using a hazard and operability approach. The external hot and cold utilities are also studied using a novel water-exergy nexus (WExN) analysis. Accordingly, two configurations are developed that integrate a Rankine cycle (RC) and an ejector refrigeration cycle (ERC) for two purposes: power and cooling co-generation (CGS) and power generation (MGS). Water losses in both systems are studied considering three cold utilities and two fossil fuel cycles using the WExN analysis, and the performance of the CGS and the MGS are compared employing several organic fluids. The results showed that the MGS had greater energetic and exergetic efficiencies, better environmental performance, and less hazardous risk impacts compared to the CGS employing almost all working fluids. The smallest exergy loss in the cooling system was 3.90 MW and 7.94 MW in the MGS allocating R123 and the CGS using R718, respectively.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> A comprehensive analysis for evaluating energy conversion systems is described. </LI> <LI> A novel water-exergy nexus analysis is employed to evaluate hot and cold utilities. </LI> <LI> A mathematical program is developed to model two integrated energy systems. </LI> <LI> According to 4ER, power generation was preferred to power/cooling cogeneration. </LI> <LI> Allocating steam caused less risks and costs but great water losses in cold utility. </LI> </UL> </P> <P><B>Graphical abstract</B></P> <P>[DISPLAY OMISSION]</P>
      번역하기

      <P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>A holistic analytical approach is proposed to study the performance of fossil fuel burning integrated energy conversion systems considering energetic, economic, exergetic, environmental and risk...

      <P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>A holistic analytical approach is proposed to study the performance of fossil fuel burning integrated energy conversion systems considering energetic, economic, exergetic, environmental and risk (4ER) aspects in a framework. For this, life cycle assessment is conducted to study environmental impacts while other analyses are performed using the algebraic thermo-mathematical programming. The hazardous risks are also investigated using a hazard and operability approach. The external hot and cold utilities are also studied using a novel water-exergy nexus (WExN) analysis. Accordingly, two configurations are developed that integrate a Rankine cycle (RC) and an ejector refrigeration cycle (ERC) for two purposes: power and cooling co-generation (CGS) and power generation (MGS). Water losses in both systems are studied considering three cold utilities and two fossil fuel cycles using the WExN analysis, and the performance of the CGS and the MGS are compared employing several organic fluids. The results showed that the MGS had greater energetic and exergetic efficiencies, better environmental performance, and less hazardous risk impacts compared to the CGS employing almost all working fluids. The smallest exergy loss in the cooling system was 3.90 MW and 7.94 MW in the MGS allocating R123 and the CGS using R718, respectively.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> A comprehensive analysis for evaluating energy conversion systems is described. </LI> <LI> A novel water-exergy nexus analysis is employed to evaluate hot and cold utilities. </LI> <LI> A mathematical program is developed to model two integrated energy systems. </LI> <LI> According to 4ER, power generation was preferred to power/cooling cogeneration. </LI> <LI> Allocating steam caused less risks and costs but great water losses in cold utility. </LI> </UL> </P> <P><B>Graphical abstract</B></P> <P>[DISPLAY OMISSION]</P>

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼