<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>A holistic analytical approach is proposed to study the performance of fossil fuel burning integrated energy conversion systems considering energetic, economic, exergetic, environmental and risk...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107443679
-
2019
-
SCIE,SCOPUS
학술저널
-
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>A holistic analytical approach is proposed to study the performance of fossil fuel burning integrated energy conversion systems considering energetic, economic, exergetic, environmental and risk...
<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>A holistic analytical approach is proposed to study the performance of fossil fuel burning integrated energy conversion systems considering energetic, economic, exergetic, environmental and risk (4ER) aspects in a framework. For this, life cycle assessment is conducted to study environmental impacts while other analyses are performed using the algebraic thermo-mathematical programming. The hazardous risks are also investigated using a hazard and operability approach. The external hot and cold utilities are also studied using a novel water-exergy nexus (WExN) analysis. Accordingly, two configurations are developed that integrate a Rankine cycle (RC) and an ejector refrigeration cycle (ERC) for two purposes: power and cooling co-generation (CGS) and power generation (MGS). Water losses in both systems are studied considering three cold utilities and two fossil fuel cycles using the WExN analysis, and the performance of the CGS and the MGS are compared employing several organic fluids. The results showed that the MGS had greater energetic and exergetic efficiencies, better environmental performance, and less hazardous risk impacts compared to the CGS employing almost all working fluids. The smallest exergy loss in the cooling system was 3.90 MW and 7.94 MW in the MGS allocating R123 and the CGS using R718, respectively.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> A comprehensive analysis for evaluating energy conversion systems is described. </LI> <LI> A novel water-exergy nexus analysis is employed to evaluate hot and cold utilities. </LI> <LI> A mathematical program is developed to model two integrated energy systems. </LI> <LI> According to 4ER, power generation was preferred to power/cooling cogeneration. </LI> <LI> Allocating steam caused less risks and costs but great water losses in cold utility. </LI> </UL> </P> <P><B>Graphical abstract</B></P> <P>[DISPLAY OMISSION]</P>