1 Yongmin Chen, "Vertical Integration, Exclusive Dealing, and Ex Post Cartelization" 38 (38): 2007
2 Herbert Hovenkamp, "The Viability of Antitrust Price Squeeze Claims" 51 : 2009
3 "Statement of the Federal Trade Commission Declining to Join the US Department of Justice Recommendation that the United States Supreme Court Review the Decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in linkline Comms. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company"
4 Dennis W. Carlton, "Should "Price Squeeze" Be a Recognized Form of A nticompetitive Conduct?" 2008
5 OECD, "Margin Squeeze-United States-, Working Party No.2 on Competition and Regulation"
6 Herbert Hovenkamp, "Federal Antitrust Policy" West 2015
7 Phillippe Chone, "Bruno Komly and Valerie Meunier, Margin Squeeze, Entry and "Umbrella Effect", Working Paper" 2010
8 "Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, Pacific Bell Tel Co. v. Link Line Comms, Inc. 2008 WL 2255265 (No. 07-512)"
9 Phillip E Areeda, "Antitrust Law Vol III" B, Aspen Publishers 2008
1 Yongmin Chen, "Vertical Integration, Exclusive Dealing, and Ex Post Cartelization" 38 (38): 2007
2 Herbert Hovenkamp, "The Viability of Antitrust Price Squeeze Claims" 51 : 2009
3 "Statement of the Federal Trade Commission Declining to Join the US Department of Justice Recommendation that the United States Supreme Court Review the Decision of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in linkline Comms. v. Pacific Bell Telephone Company"
4 Dennis W. Carlton, "Should "Price Squeeze" Be a Recognized Form of A nticompetitive Conduct?" 2008
5 OECD, "Margin Squeeze-United States-, Working Party No.2 on Competition and Regulation"
6 Herbert Hovenkamp, "Federal Antitrust Policy" West 2015
7 Phillippe Chone, "Bruno Komly and Valerie Meunier, Margin Squeeze, Entry and "Umbrella Effect", Working Paper" 2010
8 "Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae, Pacific Bell Tel Co. v. Link Line Comms, Inc. 2008 WL 2255265 (No. 07-512)"
9 Phillip E Areeda, "Antitrust Law Vol III" B, Aspen Publishers 2008