RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      The philosophy of time . v. 1 , The reality and language of time

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=M12590920

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        New York : Routledge, 2008

      • 발행연도

        2008

      • 작성언어

        영어

      • 주제어
      • DDC

        115 판사항(22)

      • ISBN

        9780415437271 (set)
        041543727X (set)
        9780415437288
        0415437288

      • 자료형태

        단행본(다권본)

      • 발행국(도시)

        England

      • 서명/저자사항

        The philosophy of time. v. 1, The reality and language of time / edited by L. Nathan Oaklander.

      • 형태사항

        xxxiii, 455 p. ; 24 cm.

      • 총서사항

        Critical concepts in philosophy

      • 일반주기명

        Include bibliographical references.

      • 소장기관
        • 연세대학교 학술문화처 도서관 소장기관정보 Deep Link
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 자료제공 : aladin
      • Volume I: The Reality and Language of Time
      • Part 1: McTaggart’s Paradox
      • 1. J. M. E. McTaggart, ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind, 17, 1908, 457?74.
      • 2. C. D. Broad, ‘Ostensible Temporality’, An Examination of McTaggart’s Philosophy, vol. 2, (Cambridge University Press, 1938), pp. 264?81, 288?317.
      • 3. A. N. Prior, ‘Changes in Events and Changes in Things’ (Lindley Lecture) (University of Kansas Press, 1962).
      • 자료제공 : aladin
      • Volume I: The Reality and Language of Time
      • Part 1: McTaggart’s Paradox
      • 1. J. M. E. McTaggart, ‘The Unreality of Time’, Mind, 17, 1908, 457?74.
      • 2. C. D. Broad, ‘Ostensible Temporality’, An Examination of McTaggart’s Philosophy, vol. 2, (Cambridge University Press, 1938), pp. 264?81, 288?317.
      • 3. A. N. Prior, ‘Changes in Events and Changes in Things’ (Lindley Lecture) (University of Kansas Press, 1962).
      • 4. D. H. Mellor, ‘McTaggart’s Proof’, Real Time II (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 70?83.
      • 5. Steven Savitt, ‘A Limited Defense of Passage’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 38, 3, July 2001, 261?70.
      • 6. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘McTaggart’s Paradox Defended’, Metaphysica: International Journal of Ontology and Metaphysics, 3, 1, 2002, 11?25.
      • 7. Josh Parsons, ‘A-Theory for B-Theorists’, Philosophical Quarterly, 52, 206, 2003, 1?20.
      • Part 2: Old B-Theories of Time
      • 8. C. D. Broad, ‘Time’, in James Hastings et al. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics, vol. 12 (Scribners, 1921), pp. 334?9, 345.
      • 9. Bertrand Russell, ‘On the Experience of Time’, Monist, 25, 1915, 212?33.
      • 10. J. J. C. Smart, The Space-Time World, Philosophy and Scientific Realism (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963), pp. 131?42.
      • 11. Nelson Goodman, ‘Of Time and Eternity’, The Structure of Appearance (Harvard University Press, 1951), pp. 287?301.
      • 12. Richard Gale, ‘Tensed Statements’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 12, 1962, 53?9.
      • Part 3: New B-Theories of Time
      • A. Token-Reflexive and Date-Analysis of Tensed Sentences
      • 13. J. J. C. Smart, ‘Time and Becoming, in Peter van Inwagen (ed.), Time and Cause, (Kluwer, 1981), pp. 3?15.
      • 14. Quentin Smith, ‘Problems with the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, Philosophical Studies, 52, Nov. 1987, 371?92.
      • 15. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘The A Defense of the New Tenseless Theory of Time’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 41, 162, 1991, 26?38.
      • 16. Joshua Mozersky, ‘Tense and Temporal Semantics’, Synthese, 124, 2, 2000, 257?79.
      • 17. Heather Dyke, ‘Token, Dates and Tenseless Truth Conditions’, Synthese, 131, 3, 2002, 329?351.
      • 18. Laurie A. Paul, ‘Truth Conditions of Tensed Sentence Types’, Synthese, 111, 1, 1997, 53?71.
      • 19. Quentin Smith, ‘The "Sentence-Type" Version of the Tenseless Theory of Time’, Synthese, 119, 3, 1999, 233?51.
      • 20. Joshua Mozersky, ‘Smith on Times and Tokens’, Synthese, 129, 3, Dec. 2001, 405?11.
      • B. Alternative Analyses of Tensed Sentences
      • 21. Graham Priest, ‘Tense and Truth Conditions’, Analysis, 46, 1986, 162?6.
      • 22. D. H. Mellor, ‘Tense’s Tenseless Truth Conditions’, Analysis, 46, 1986, 167?72.
      • 23. Graham Priest, ‘Tense, Tense, and TENSE’, Analysis, 47, 1987, 184?7.
      • 24. Michelle Beer, ‘A Defense of the Co-Reporting Thesis of Tensed and Tenseless Sentences’, Philo, 10.1 (Spring/Summer 2007).
      • 25. Quentin Smith, ‘Can the New Tenseless Theory of Time Be Saved By Individual Essences?’, Philo, 10.1 (Spring/Summer 2007).
      • 26. Michelle Beer, ‘On the Individual Essences of Moments of Time’, Philo, 10.1 (Spring/Summer 2007).
      • 27. D. H. Mellor, Thinking in Time, Real Time II (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 58?69.
      • 28. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘Two Versions of the New B-Theory of Language’, in Quentin Smith and Alexandar Jokic (eds.), Time, Tense and Reference (MIT Press, 2003), pp. 271?303.
      • 29. Heather Dyke, ‘A New Metaphysical Strategy: Lessons Learned from the Philosophy of Time’, Metaphysics and the Representational Fallacy (Routledge, 2007), pp. 37?62.
      • Volume II: Timeand Metaphysics
      • Part 4: The Full Future Theory
      • 30. George Schlesinger, ‘Temporal Becoming’, Aspects of Time (Hackett Publishing Co., 1980), pp. 23?6, 30?3, 140?1.
      • 31. J. Bigelow, ‘Worlds Enough for Time’, Nous, 1991, 1?20.
      • 32. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘Bigelow, Possible Worlds and the Passage of Time’, Analysis, 54, 4, Oct. 1994, 244?8.
      • 33. Quentin Smith, ‘The Logical Structure of the Debate about McTaggart’s Paradox’, Philosophical Research Archives, 24, 1988?9, 371?9.
      • 34. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘McTaggart Paradox and Smith’s Tensed Theory of Time’, Synthese, 107, 1996, 205?21.
      • Part 5: The Open Future Theory
      • 35. C. D. Broad, ‘The General Problem of Time and Change’, Scientific Thought (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1923), pp. 53?84.
      • 36. M. Dummett, ‘Truth and the Past?Lecture 3: The Metaphysics of Time’, The Journal of Philosophy, C, 1, Jan. 2003, 38?53.
      • 37. Michael Tooley, Time, Tense and Causation (Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 13?20, 33?42, 152?4, 303?5.
      • 38. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘Tooley on Time and Tense’, in L. N. Oaklander (ed.), The Importance of Time (Kluwer, 2001), pp. 3?12.
      • 39. Storrs McCall, ‘A Dynamic Model of Temporal Becoming’, Analysis, 44, 1984, 172?6.
      • 40. Graham Nerlich, ‘Falling Branches and the Flow of Time’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76, 2, June 1998, 309?16.
      • 41. Storrs McCall, ‘Time Flow Does Not Require a Second Time Dimension’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76, 2, June 1988, 317?22.
      • 42. Craig Bourne, ‘When am I? A Tense Time for Some Tense Theorists’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 80, 3, Sept. 2002, 359?71.
      • Part 6: Presentism
      • 43. Robin Le Poidevin, ‘Temporal Solipsism’, Time, Change and Contradiction: A Defense of a Tenseless Theory of Time (St Martin’s Press, 1991), pp. 36?57.
      • 44. William Lane Craig, ‘McTaggart’s Paradox and Temporal Solipsism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, 1, 2001, 32?44.
      • 45. William Lane Craig, Tense and Temporal Relations, American Philosophical Quarterly, 38, 1, 85?97.
      • 46. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘Presentism: A Critique’, in Hallvard Lillehammer and G. Rodriguez Pereyra (eds.), Real Metaphysics: Essays in Honour of D. H. Mellor, With His Replies (Routledge, 2002), pp. 196?211.
      • 47. Quentin Smith, ‘Time and Degrees of Existence: A Theory of "Degree Presentism"’, in Craig Callender (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 119?36.
      • 48. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘Time and Existence: A Critique of Degree Presentism’, in Maria Elisabeth Reicher (ed.), States of Affairs (Ontos Verlag, 2008).
      • 49. Ned Markosian, ‘A Defense of Presentism’, in Dean Zimmermann (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. I (Clarendon Press, 2004), pp. 47?82.
      • 50. Simon Keller, ‘Presentism and Truthmaking’, in Dean Zimmermann (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. I (Clarendon Press, 2004), pp. 83?104.
      • 51. Craig Bourne, ‘A Theory of Presentism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 36, 1, 2006, 1?23.
      • 52. M. Joshua Mozersky, ‘Bourne-Again Presentism’ (new for this collection).
      • 53. Michael Rea, ‘Four-Dimensionalism’, in Michael Loux and Dean Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics (Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 246?80.
      • 54. M. Oreste Fiocco, ‘A Defense of Transient Presentism’, American Philosophical Quarterly, Oct. 2007.
      • Volume III: Time, Experience and Freedom
      • Part 7: Thank Goodness That’s Over!
      • 55. A. N. Prior, ‘Thank Goodness That’s Over’, Philosophy, 34, 1959, 12?17.
      • 56. Murray MacBeath, ‘Mellor’s Emeritus Headache’, Ratio, 25, 1983, 81?8.
      • 57. D. H. Mellor, ‘The Presence of Experience’, Real Time II (Routledge, 1998), pp. 39?46.
      • 58. Michelle Beer, ‘Prior’s "Thank Goodness That’s Over" Objection to the B-Theory’, Chronos: Proceedings of the Philosophy of Time Society VII, 2004?2005, 32?7.
      • 59. Heather Dyke and James Maclaurin, ‘"Thank Goodness That’s Over": The Evolutionary Story’, Ratio, XV, 2002, 276?92.
      • 60. Maxwell Goss, ‘Temporal Belief and Temporal Experience’ (new for this collection).
      • Part 8: The Presence of Experience
      • 61. William Lane Craig, ‘The B-Theorist "Tu Quoque" Argument’, Synthese, 107, 2 1996, 249?69.
      • 62. Joshua Mozersky, ‘A Tenseless Account of the Presence of Experience’, Philosophical Studies, 129, 3, 2006, 441?76.
      • 63. Yuri Balashov, ‘Time of Our Lives: Negotiating the Presence of Experience’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 42, 4, 2005, 295?309.
      • 64. William Lane Craig, ‘Wishing it Were Now Some Other Time’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62, 1 2001, 159?66.
      • 65. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘Be Careful What You Wish For: A Reply to Craig’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 76, 1, 2008, 156?63.
      • 66. Simon Prosser, ‘Could We Experience the Passage of Time?’, Ratio, 20,1, 2007, 75?90.
      • Part 9: Time and Consciousness
      • 67. Gustav Bergmann, ‘Duration and the Specious Present’, Philosophy of Science, 27, 1, Jan. 1960, 39?47.
      • 68. Ronald C. Hoy, ‘A Note on Gustav Bergmann’s Treatment of Temporal Consciousness’, Philosophy of Science, 42, 1, Dec. 1976, 610?17.
      • 69. Barry Dainton, ‘Time and Consciousness, Time and Space (Acumen Publishing, 2001), pp. 93?109.
      • 70. Robin Le Poidevin, ‘Memory and the A-series’, Time and History (Ontos Verlag, 2006), pp. 31?42.
      • Part 10: Freedom
      • 71. Jan Lukasiewicz, ‘On Determinism’, in Storrs McCall (ed.), Polish Logic: 1920?1939 (Clarendon Press, 1967), pp. 19?39.
      • 72. L. Nathan Oaklander, ‘Freedom and the New Theory of Time’, in Robin Le Poidevin (ed.), Questions of Time and Tense (Clarendon Press, 1998), pp. 185?205.
      • 73. Joseph Diekemper, ‘B-Theory, Fixity, and Fatalism’, Nous, 41, 3, 429?52.
      • 74. Michael Rea, ‘Presentism and Fatalism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84, 4, Dec. 2006, 511?24.
      • Volume IV: Time and Physics
      • Part 11: The A-theory and Special Relativity
      • 75. Kurt Godel ‘A Remark About the Relationship Between Relativity Theory and Idealistic Philosophy’, in Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist (Open Court Publishing Company, 1949), pp. 557?62.
      • 76. Hilary Putnam, ‘Time and Physical Geometry’, Journal of Philosophy, 64, 1967, 240?7.
      • 77. Howard Stein, ‘On Relativity Theory and Openness of the Future’, Philosophy of Science, 58, 1991, 147?67.
      • 78. Lawrence Sklar, ‘Time, Reality and Relativity’, in Richard Healey (ed.), Reduction, Time and Reality (Cambridge University Press, 1981), pp. 129?42.
      • 79. Quentin Smith, ‘The Incompatibility of STR and the Tensed Theory of Time’, in L. Nathan Oaklander (ed.), The Importance of Time (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001), pp. 153?6.
      • 80. Simon Saunders, ‘How Relativity Contradicts Presentism’, in Craig Callender (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 277?92.
      • 81. William Lane Craig, ‘The Metaphysics of Special Relativity: Three Views’, in William Lane Craig and Quentin Smith (eds.), Einstein, Relativity and Absolute Simultaneity (Routledge, 2007).
      • 82. Yuri Balashov and Michel Janssen, ‘Critical Notice: Presentism and Relativity’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 2003, 327?46.
      • 83. C. Bourne, The Present Dialectic in Special Relativity, A Future for Presentism (Oxford University Press, 2006), pp. 160?86.
      • 84. James B. Hartle, ‘The Physics of Now’, American Journal of Physics, 73, 2, 2005, 101?9.
      • Part 12: The Direction of Time
      • 85. T. Gold, ‘The Arrow of Time’, in S. T. Butler and H. Messel (eds.), Time (Pergamon Press, 1965), pp. 143?65
      • 86. Adolf Grunbaum, ‘The Anisotropy of Time’, in T. Gold and D.L. Schumacher (eds.), The Nature of Time (Cornell University Press, 1967), pp. 149?77, 245?7.
      • 87. Lawrence Sklar, ‘Up and Down, Left and Right, Past and Future’, Nous, 15, 1981, 111?29.
      • 88. Erwin Tegtmeier, ‘Direction of Time, A Problem of Ontology, not of Physics’, in J. Faye et al. (eds.), Perspectives on Time (Kluwer, 1997), pp. 183?91.
      • 89. Mauro Dorato, ‘Absolute Becoming, Relational Becoming and the Arrow of Time: Some Non-Conventional Remarks on the Relationship Between Physics and Metaphysics’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 37, 3, 2006, 559?76.
      • Part 13: Time Travel
      • 90. David Lewis, ‘The Paradoxes of Time Travel’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 13, 1 1976, 145?52.
      • 91. Paul Horwich, ‘Time Travel’, Asymmetries in Time (MIT Press, 1967), pp. 111?28.
      • 92. Nicholas J. J. Smith, ‘Bananas Enough for Time Travel’, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 48, 1997, 363?89.
      • 93. D. H. Mellor, ‘Time Travel’, in Katinka Ridderbos (ed.), Time (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 46?64.
      • 94. Simon Keller and Michael Nelson, ‘Presentists Should Believe in Time Travel’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, 2001, 333?45.
      • 95. Ted Sider, ‘Traveling in A- and B- Time’, Monist, 88, 3, 2005, 329?35.
      • 96. Kristie Miller, ‘Time Travel and the Open Future’, Disputatio, 19, 1, 2005, pp. 223?32.
      • Epilogue
      • 97. D. H. Mellor, ‘Time’, in Frank Jackson and Michael Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 615?35.
      더보기

      온라인 도서 정보

      온라인 서점 구매

      온라인 서점 구매 정보
      서점명 서명 판매현황 종이책 전자책 구매링크
      정가 판매가(할인율) 포인트(포인트몰)
      알라딘

      The Philosophy of Time (Multiple-component retail product)

      판매중 2,169,370원 1,778,880원 (18%)

      종이책 구매

      88,950포인트
      예스24.com

      Philosophy of Time

      판매중 2,169,370원 1,952,430원 (10%)

      종이책 구매

      97,630포인트 (5%)
      • 포인트 적립은 해당 온라인 서점 회원인 경우만 해당됩니다.
      • 상기 할인율 및 적립포인트는 온라인 서점에서 제공하는 정보와 일치하지 않을 수 있습니다.
      • RISS 서비스에서는 해당 온라인 서점에서 구매한 상품에 대하여 보증하거나 별도의 책임을 지지 않습니다.

      책소개

      자료제공 : NAVER

      The Philosophy of Time

      Part of the "Critical Concepts in Philosophy" series, this book brings together in four volumes the canonical scholarship in the field. It is useful as a work of reference for philosophers of time - as well as those working in related areas of philosophy of science, philosophy of mind, and philosophy of religion.

      more

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼