소규모근린공원의 입지유형별 CPTED 비교연구 = A Comparative Study on CPTED by Location Type of Small neighborhood Park

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to provide basic data when the park is created or
reorganized by comparing CPTED in residential, commercial, and industrial areas
according to the location type of small neighborhood park in Gimhae-si.
This study is a comparative study on the status of small neighborhood park
CPTED types and aims to compare the status of each type according to residential,
commercial, and industrial areas. In order to achieve the research purpose, the
research target site is selected, the current status survey and survey are conducted,
and the park creation according to the type is presented through statistical analysis.
To this end, this study conducted and analyzed residential, commercial, and
industrial parks by location type in Gimhae-si, Gyeongsangnam-do, on residents'
general matters, crime anxiety, and CPTED techniques. In addition, improvements
were presented for parks by location type by conducting a current status survey.
The results of this study are as follows.
First, in a survey on crime occurrence anxiety when using a park, it was analyzed
that the anxiety of industrial parks was 6.4% lower than that of residential and
commercial parks, and commercial parks was 5.6%. Contrary to the idea that
industrial areas feel relatively dangerous and unstable, industrial parks were analyzed
to have significant differences in access control, territoriality, increased usability, and
maintenance. As a result of visiting the park through a current status survey, it
was found that the park's view, night lighting, and maintenance were well
established in the case of industrial parks.
Second, in the case of natural monitoring, there were cases where trees in the park
block the view compared to industrial parks, and the illuminance and brightness of
night lights were insufficient compared to those in the industrial area. Therefore, the
installation of convex mirrors and planting that can monitor blind spots should be
properly arranged so as not to block the view, and the illuminance and brightness
of night lights should also be installed with caution.
Third, in the case of access control, the overall view of the entrance was good, but
in the case of residential parks, it was insufficient compared to commercial and
industrial parks, and the information boards of the parks were similarly investigated.
In the case of residential and commercial parks, it was investigated that there were
places that entered the park except for the entrance. Accordingly, the view of the
entrance and the information board of the park must be installed in a place where
the view is well visible, and fences or fences must be installed except for the
entrance, and access control to the park must be required.
Fourth, in the case of territorial fortress, the entrance to each park and the space of
a specific tree were well separated, and there were no CCTVs and emergency bells
installed, so it was found that there were insufficient places to easily identify park
entrances, passages, and signs by night lighting. Therefore, the additional installation
of CCTVs and emergency bells in the park was a necessary part, and in the case
of residential and commercial parks, night lighting was found to be important.
Fifth, in the case of increased usability, the location of pavilions and benches in
each park was generally satisfied, and similarly, the current status survey was
investigated. However, it was investigated that the separation table would need to
be installed because there was no separation table installed on the bench in the
park.
Sixth, in the case of maintenance and management, commercial parks showed lower
results than residential and industrial parks. In particular, no trash cans were
installed at all of the survey sites, and the operation of lighting and facilities were
damaged. Accordingly, it was investigated that garbage cans or information signs
should be installed in the park to manage them, and that the maintenance of
lighting and facilities in the park would be necessary continuously.
In this study, the survey target site was limited to two small neighborhood parks in
residential, commercial, and industrial areas according to the location type located in
Gimhae-si, so there is a limit to generalization of parks nationwide. In addition, the
number of study sites was small, and there was a limit to the subjects during the
survey, so it may be insufficient.
As a future task, if the target site is expanded and surveys are conducted by
supplementing various subjects, it is considered that it can be used as more
objective data than now.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제 1 장 서론 ································································································· 1
• 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적························································································· 1
• 1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법························································································· 2
• 1.3. 연구의 과정······································································································· 3
• 제 2 장 이론적 고찰 ······················································································ 4
• 2.1 근린공원의 개념 ······························································································ 4
• 2.2 CPTED의 개념 및 원리···················································································· 6
• 2.2.1 CPTED의 의의·························································································· 6
• 2.2.2 CPTED의 기본원리 및 필요성································································· 6
• 2.3 국내 CPTED 관련 지침 및 법규··································································· 10
• 2.3.1 주요 CPTED 가이드라인 및 지침·························································· 10
• 2.3.2 CPTED관련 법령····················································································· 12
• 2.4 선행 연구 고찰································································································ 15
• 2.4.1 공원 CPTED전략····················································································· 15
• 2.4.2 공원 CPTED관련 선행연구···································································· 18
• 2.4.3 국내외 공원 CPTED 적용사례······························································· 22
• 제 3 장 연구 방법 ······················································································· 30
• 3.1 분석의 틀········································································································· 30
• 3.2 연구 대상지 선정····························································································· 31
• 3.2.1 연 구 대상지 선정배경············································································ 31
• 3.2.2 연구 대상지 선정····················································································· 32
• 3.2.3 연구 대상지 개요····················································································· 33
• 제 4 장 소규모근린공원의 입지유형별 CPTED 비교분석 ····················· 52
• 4.1 조사개요··········································································································· 52
• 4.1.1 현황조사································································································· 52
• 4.1.1 설문조사································································································· 52
• 4.2 현황조사 결과·································································································· 53
• 4.2.1 전체공원 현황조사 결과········································································ 42
• 4.2.2 주거지역(A,B)공원 현황조사 결과························································ 55
• 4.2.3 상업지역(C,D)공원 현황조사 결과························································ 57
• 4.2.4 공업지역(E,F)공원 현황조사 결과························································ 59
• 4.3 설문조사 결과·································································································· 61
• 4.3.1 전체공원 설문조사결과············································································ 61
• 4.3.2 주거지역공원 설문조사결과···································································· 72
• 4.3.3 상업지역공원 설문조사결과···································································· 79
• 4.3.4 공업지역공원 설문조사결과···································································· 85
• 4.3.5 입지유형별 공원의 독립표본T검증························································· 92
• 4.4 소결·················································································································· 95
• 제 5 장 결론 ································································································· 97
• 5.1 연구의 요약······································································································ 97
• 5.2 연구의 한계 및 향후 과제·············································································· 99
• 참고 문헌 ··································································································· 100
• 설 문 지 ··································································································· 103
• ABSTRACT ······························································································· 107